Jump to content

West Orange-Stark 21 Sweeny 3/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, dj said:

W.o made this game harder than it was. They have to many backs to not to run different kids. Can't understand the offense play calling at all. Sweeney had a couple descent athlete and that's it. Worried again abt this play calling. 

Yes, I think we could have gotten outside on them with success. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, MMstangfan said:

Yes, I think we could have gotten outside on them with success. 

They were so tired up the middle of there defense. They had to pinch down every play to stop the run up the middle.so if u can explain it to me please do.the QB wasn't  throwing bad passes.i dont know why we didn't keep throwing deep bcz there corners were horrible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, wosfan1992 said:

Sweeny had NOTHING for us. should’ve been 35-0 easily but i’ll take the W. Our defense has dramatically improved but still have to tighten up that middle. Also need to limit the fumbles. Think we fumbled about 4 times. Overall we’ll be ok, but that playcalling......

One thing abt our middle. Is when we try to leave 54 and 51 in there we are vulnerable. That's why I said in another post that 58 and 69 alone with 49.makes us pretty descent up front. We just gotta continue to rotate the other 2 in there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, wosfan1992 said:

Sweeny had NOTHING for us. should’ve been 35-0 easily but i’ll take the W. Our defense has dramatically improved but still have to tighten up that middle. Also need to limit the fumbles. Think we fumbled about 4 times. Overall we’ll be ok, but that playcalling......

Really? Lol cmon now. Both didnt play the best game but Sweeny play calling is horrible but their defense played damn good. Close game until the end. WOS is decent but not world beaters no hate just saying cmon with the post. Sweeny ran the same plays over and over. But Good luck to yall next week against Jasper. Off to watch my Shadow Creek Sharks!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, dogs_21 said:

Really? Lol cmon now. Both didnt play the best game but Sweeny play calling is horrible but their defense played damn good. Close game until the end. WOS is decent but not world beaters no hate just saying cmon with the post. Sweeny ran the same plays over and over. But Good luck to yall next week against Jasper. Off to watch my Shadow Creek Sharks!

I had the same thought... the whole Sweeny has nothing for us is a bit of over confidence lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First the refs were terrible a bunch of Mo4’s!!!

I figured that conditioning was going to be a factor today and it was. Sweeny’s defense was big and could not make stops in the second half they got wore DOWN. WOS left at least 3 TD’s on the field because of turnovers. I’m totally upset at what happened to Wilson and the officiating crew failed to protect him. How in the heck can you see every wrong that the Mustangs did but, not see when Sweeny was committing fouls? That kid was hurt and if I was his mother I would file a complaint against the whole bunch of them….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Final thought on this game then moving on to the next one. Sweeny's #1 rusher didn't play almost the whole first half. That makes no sense to me. I understand the reason they were prob trying to save him. But they should've came out charging that offense. Try to catch the stangs on their heels. They were running a back who hasn't had one carry all year. I think their starter ran a few at the end of the 2nd but no luck. Those two possessions the stangs had in the red zone they should've scored on. Hated the kicker missed that fg attempt. So yes I think it should've been 14-0 in the 1st for sure. Or even 10-0. I think the Sweeny offense was good but not some overwhelming offense the stangs couldn't handle. They had some big boys up front but not very quick. The QB and the few backs were good just not good enough to rack up their average of 40+ points against the chain gang. Chain gang played pretty decent tonight they did show a few problems up the middle. I watched those coaches do what they do and coach those boys when they got off the field when they made mistakes. The 4th quarter was most definitely the game changer. Stangs had 2 scores and that fumble recover nailed the coffin closed. I saw alot of dirty ball from those Sweeny defense players. Sweeny had 4 defensive facemask penalties and 2 were pretty violent. Coach T made a good call with a few minutes left after that last facemask and decided to call a timeout and run the clock out. So I know offense didnt play that great, execution of play calling/kids out of position etc... but every game is a coaching opportunity to better the kids and with this win they have another week to show how great they can be. Can't wait until next week!! 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Magnus1on11 said:

Final thought on this game then moving on to the next one. Sweeny's #1 rusher didn't play almost the whole first half. That makes no sense to me. I understand the reason they were prob trying to save him. But they should've came out charging that offense. Try to catch the stangs on their heels. They were running a back who hasn't had one carry all year. I think their starter ran a few at the end of the 2nd but no luck. Those two possessions the stangs had in the red zone they should've scored on. Hated the kicker missed that fg attempt. So yes I think it should've been 14-0 in the 1st for sure. Or even 10-0. I think the Sweeny offense was good but not some overwhelming offense the stangs couldn't handle. They had some big boys up front but not very quick. The QB and the few backs were good just not good enough to rack up their average of 40+ points against the chain gang. Chain gang played pretty decent tonight they did show a few problems up the middle. I watched those coaches do what they do and coach those boys when they got off the field when they made mistakes. The 4th quarter was most definitely the game changer. Stangs had 2 scores and that fumble recover nailed the coffin closed. I saw alot of dirty ball from those Sweeny defense players. Sweeny had 4 defensive facemask penalties and 2 were pretty violent. Coach T made a good call with a few minutes left after that last facemask and decided to call a timeout and run the clock out. So I know offense didnt play that great, execution of play calling/kids out of position etc... but every game is a coaching opportunity to better the kids and with this win they have another week to show how great they can be. Can't wait until next week!! 

 

 

 

Still refuse to play mustang football for 4 quarters ,still not understanding that. Sweeny came to play we just happened to play a little bit better with 9 minutes left otherwise it was a Toss up til then

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • The problem as well as that all of the social justice warriors, influencers, and instigators repeat these lies in the immediate days after the event, garnering outrage.  But when they're proven false they never go back and rescind their outrage-causing posts, they just move on to the next one.
    • I just find it really hard to believe that Trump will select a VP based on the votes they bring him.  He's going to want a Trumper that will affirm his every move and stoke his ego.  I'm hoping I'm wrong, but I doubt it.  And as you said, in these battle ground states a few tenths of a % point may be enough to swing the whole election.  Trump can't afford a VP who will cost him votes (Noem would cost him full points, not just tenths), but also needs a candidate that will bring in as many votes as possible.  So hopefully whichever Trump disciple he chooses has some political appeal to swing voters.
    • Good news for this district is for the next two seasons your bi district opposition shouldn’t be much of a challenge… Royal may be better next year but other than that the district is pretty rough… Very good chance that it’s a clean sweep though
    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...