Jump to content

West Orange-Stark 21 Bridge City 0/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

3rd and 9. Pass complete but short of 1st.4th down and sibley takes it to the house, Called back.2nd and 10 from the..fumble WOS recovers.3rd down and 7.Holding BC.1st and 10 from BC 21.Incomplete pass.2nd and 10. Run to the 9.1st and goal.2nd from the 7. 3rd from the 2.Loss back to the 5. 4th and goal.Time out BC .About 7 min left.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ladybug33 said:

Congrats WOS! #54 is a very good player on defense. Justin Sibley played well through-out the game. O-line needs to get better quickly.

#54 nickname is the animal.

Coach T not happy with 2nd half effort, said on KOGT they laid another egg like last week,
Blocking and passing game must improve.  Sooner or later, someone will be able to stuff the run and we will be forced to pass.  Won't be pretty if it stays the same as now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, ST413 said:

A little suprised WOS didnt score more in this one,  but i see that defense is still there.

Should had at least one more score if not 2. Had the ball inside BC 15 yard line, snap goes over QBs head and BC recovers, another time had ball at BC 5 and went for it on 4th down and was stopped for a loss

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ATTITUDE IS EVERYTHING said:

Its almost 10 here I  dont think ima make the whole game but ima try 

4 yards???? Y’all better recognize up in this mix....4 total yards at halftime!! Am I the only one on this set that realizes how damn serious that is! Chain gang straight up suffocating fools. I bet the Bridge City OC wanted to start crying or drinking or something. Outside of a few select teams, WOS is hands down my favorite team. I love everything about them, and the head coach is just a bad ass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, LC-M said:

I was not at the game, and my friend was. He said the WOS play calling was questionable. ID just assume that WOS was just playing some second string guys. Was BC able to move the ball?

I just watched it myself.and ima say it again.the offense play calling is horrible.to predictable.but at least the QB didn't turn it over.thank God for the defense.w.o will get away with a lot bcz there defense will keep them in the game.if the OC can figure out how to get the passing game going they will be a different team.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, dj said:

I just watched it myself.and ima say it again.the offense play calling is horrible.to predictable.but at least the QB didn't turn it over.thank God for the defense.w.o will get away with a lot bcz there defense will keep them in the game.if the OC can figure out how to get the passing game going they will be a different team.

I totally agree with your last sentence. Right now the offense is to predictable and too vanilla. I’ve seen 4 of the 5 games and opposing defenses are not worrying about the pass. I sure hope they can figure it out but I’m starting to wonder if it’s just not there this year. I mean 5 games into the season and it’s not any better than week 1.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, marshman said:

I totally agree with your last sentence. Right now the offense is to predictable and too vanilla. I’ve seen 4 of the 5 games and opposing defenses are not worrying about the pass. I sure hope they can figure it out but I’m starting to wonder if it’s just not there this year. I mean 5 games into the season and it’s not any better than week 1.

The offense is to simple.im sorry but it goes back to coaching. This is a year where ur best player is hurt.and ur o/l is struggling.so as a coach u have to make the game easy.when u have game breaking kids on offense it's easy to call a play.bc one miss and there to the house.this year especially I don't think we kno how to coach the kids.passing routes are simple.3 routes.everybody go deep.or its a come back to the side line.or both sides run stop routes.thats it. What happened to combination routes.or just dumping the ball off to the running back out the backfield. Even better we have descent receivers.man coverage just throw a fade route.just to get the defense to back up.ik the kids themselves has to get better.but our biggest problem right now is play calling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, LC-M said:

I was not at the game, and my friend was. He said the WOS play calling was questionable. ID just assume that WOS was just playing some second string guys. Was BC able to move the ball?

WOS was playing some freshmen in the second half along with some new guys to their respective positions. A great team works on their weakness and uses predistrict games to get better. That’s what they did on O in the second half. They knew BC could barely get a first down much less score so why keep your heavy hitters in the game when you know you have it won? Let the youngsters get some experience and also experiment with different personnel.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dj said:

I just watched it myself.and ima say it again.the offense play calling is horrible.to predictable.but at least the QB didn't turn it over.thank God for the defense.w.o will get away with a lot bcz there defense will keep them in the game.if the OC can figure out how to get the passing game going they will be a different team.

Yeah I heard that. Also heard LCM should beat Bc

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give the play calling a rest.This offense is still trying to find itself.You call the plays that fit your personal.With a non-existent passing game you are limited on the play calling.The qb is the anchor of a good team and we are still trying to find that person.Coach T has said as much when he states that we are still trying to find the leaders of this team and that is why he is bringing up people from the JV.He is very frustrated to say the lease that we can't put together 4 quarters on the field.We are a work in progress bottom line. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    hinab
    Newest Member
    hinab
    Joined



  • Posts

    • I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
    • The problem our buddy @CardinalBacker has is that the Dems have been cheating Trump since before his inauguration.  There's 4 cheats going on right now against a private citizen.  But yet he wants us to believe that the 2020 election was squeaky clean.  No cheating what so ever.  That a brain dead individual got 81 million votes.  But the other guy that was supposed to be so bad got 74 million, the most any President ever got for reelection.  Evil people don't turn on and off their evil cheating ways.  
    • *** Moved to High School Baseball Forum***
    • You just analogized to a tee the situation going on with the Trump New York trial. And I bet you can't even see the hypocrisy elicited out of your hatred. You once again outed yourself...without any realization of your actions. I'm not sure if Reagan actually set you up to expose your blatant hypocrisy, or if it was just a happy coincidence. You seem to thrive on humiliating yourself. Now get to work on providing that evidence of your emphatic declarations that Trump's economy was horrible. You failed miserably before, I bet you will again.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...