Jump to content

Global Warming Update!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, PhatMack19 said:

When Gore ran for President in 2000 his Net Worth was between $700k-$1.6mil.  

Just 17 short years later Al Gore is worth an estimated $300 million.  

 

Global warming has been very good to that man.  

Big girl, new tobie, and the associates should be in a furor over him amassing that much wealth, since in a socialist society they want, no one should be that rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Big girl, new tobie, and the associates should be in a furor over him amassing that much wealth, since in a socialist society they want, no one should be that rich.

I will admit that my Net Worth has also increased by 300x during that same time, but I was in college in 2000 and was worth around 27 bucks and some change.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

I'm pretty sure he is talking about a new world order, or one world government.  This will happen, maybe not in our lifetime, but it is coming.  And, the UN will be firmly behind it.

I get it...I'm just pushing buttons.

I just get a kick out of Kountzer thinking no one has the answers but him.

By the way, I don't think anyone has any idea how global politics will play out in the future or how soon it will take place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I get it...I'm just pushing buttons.

I just get a kick out of Kountzer thinking no one has the answers but him.

By the way, I don't think anyone has any idea how global politics will play out in the future or how soon it will take place.

My guy has been to bible study ;) 

(By the way, i think it’s hilariously ironic that we can agree that one thing we do know, is that we don’t know!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TxHoops said:

My guy has been to bible study ;) 

(By the way, i think it’s hilariously ironic that we can agree that one thing we do know, is that we don’t know!)

It sure is ironic. This is the whole philosophy of the so-called and hilariously labeled "deniers". Too bad this philosophy is taken to heart instead of the worshipping at the feet of those who proclaim "the debate is over".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

What the hell is a Bomb Cyclone?  Al Gore is full of crap.  We have frozen hurricanes about to hit to the east coast and I’m not talking about the drink.  

 

This is the hidden content, please

Al Gore is the most prominent Flim-Flam man in history (except L. Ron Hubbard).  What a lick.  I love the way Greg Bostwick rolls his eyes when they start talking Polar Vortex.  Imo, The Weather Channel could hire Greg and fire all their prognosticators.  Been watching him since he was a pup.  Best in the business for my money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I notice that, quite often, the word "science" is used as a suggestion that there is no question about the global warming debate.  That same "science", for years, had alleged that vitamin supplements were beneficial.  I know many people for whom Vitamin D was prescribed  by a physician ( based upon "scientific evidence")to help address the bone loss issue as a result of advancing age.  If anyone has noticed, in the last few days, "science" has stated that there is no benefit in taking these supplements

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

I notice that, quite often, the word "science" is used as a suggestion that there is no question about the global warming debate.  That same "science", for years, had alleged that vitamin supplements were beneficial.  I know many people for whom Vitamin D was prescribed  by a physician ( based upon "scientific evidence")to help address the bone loss issue as a result of advancing age.  If anyone has noticed, in the last few days, "science" has stated that there is no benefit in taking these supplements

This "science" is usually funded by drug companies.  So...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, stevenash said:

My point was the FACT that science sometimes discovers that its "evidence" is incorrect.  Therefore, attaching the word scientific ( favorite of global warming purveyors)to an explanation does not necessarily confirm indisputable accuracy.

True!  And my fact would also be "follow the money!"  AlGore made a lot of money on this global warming scam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, TxHoops said:

My guy has been to bible study ;) 

(By the way, i think it’s hilariously ironic that we can agree that one thing we do know, is that we don’t know!)

 

rev 13

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

 

rev 13

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

We were talking Matthew 24:36

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    NEWton86
    Newest Member
    NEWton86
    Joined



  • Posts

    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up   I wish the Ohio AG much success...from the article: Ohio’s Republican Attorney General is pushing back against critics after warning that anti-Israel protesters wearing masks are facing potential prison time due to a little known state law. "The First Amendment protects you and saying whatever it is you have to say. Even hateful things are protected by the First Amendment," Ohio AG Dave Yost told Fox News Digital this week. "The First Amendment, though, was always designed to be a shield against the government. It's not a sword against your fellow students and they have rights too. Your First Amendment rights are limited by their right to be able to go to school, use the library, get the value of their education and the tuition that they paid for." In a letter sent on Monday, Yost warned university presidents of a historic state law that could mean masked anti-Israel demonstrators on college campuses could face felony charges.  "The law is an old law," Yost told Fox News Digital. "It goes back to the 20th century, and it was originally designed to make sure that people like Ku Klux Klan were held accountable, that, of course, the reason that the Ku Klux Klan wore hoods and masks over their faces is so that they couldn't be identified because they were committing crimes. So the General Assembly in Ohio said, okay, you can wear a mask, you can wear a hood, that's fine. But if you commit a crime with two or more other people, while you are masking yourself, we're going to see that as a heightened kind of crime, a worse kind of thing, because you're consciously doing this and trying to hide your identity because you know you're doing something wrong."
    • You keep pointing at the fact that Biden got so many votes as proof of cheating, when it’s actually proof of something else… Trump motivates people to get off of the couch, register, and vote for ANYBODY BUT TRUMP.  And instead of looking in the mirror and recognizing that the problem is you (the person who nominates a candidate that most people HATE) you blame the people who vote against him.    Haley pulled down 22% of the votes in the most recent Republican  primary. Those votes were cast AFTER she’d already dropped out of the race.    Trump is going to lose the fourth consecutive election cycle since he beat the even more unlikable Hillary in  2016. The Dems learned from their mistake (nominating a despised candidate in ‘16). The Rs keep nominating the same guy that most people hate and expecting different results.    Dems roll in November. 
    • Not yet, anyway. If you can't see that there has been a strong effort to create gender dysphoria amongst young folks AND try to keep it from parents in many instances, you're not paying attention. You may not care about this, but it's ridiculous to ridicule those that do. There is an agenda behind this, no doubt about it, like bullets pointed out earlier, it's just a name change...for now. And it was only very recently that girls were allowed to join the "boy scouts", they have been allowed to join certain other groups that weren't available to girls at the time. It's the frog in the slow boil.
    • Bullard 10  LCM - 4  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...