Jump to content

Global Warming Update!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, PhatMack19 said:

When Gore ran for President in 2000 his Net Worth was between $700k-$1.6mil.  

Just 17 short years later Al Gore is worth an estimated $300 million.  

 

Global warming has been very good to that man.  

Big girl, new tobie, and the associates should be in a furor over him amassing that much wealth, since in a socialist society they want, no one should be that rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Big girl, new tobie, and the associates should be in a furor over him amassing that much wealth, since in a socialist society they want, no one should be that rich.

I will admit that my Net Worth has also increased by 300x during that same time, but I was in college in 2000 and was worth around 27 bucks and some change.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

I'm pretty sure he is talking about a new world order, or one world government.  This will happen, maybe not in our lifetime, but it is coming.  And, the UN will be firmly behind it.

I get it...I'm just pushing buttons.

I just get a kick out of Kountzer thinking no one has the answers but him.

By the way, I don't think anyone has any idea how global politics will play out in the future or how soon it will take place.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

I get it...I'm just pushing buttons.

I just get a kick out of Kountzer thinking no one has the answers but him.

By the way, I don't think anyone has any idea how global politics will play out in the future or how soon it will take place.

My guy has been to bible study ;) 

(By the way, i think it’s hilariously ironic that we can agree that one thing we do know, is that we don’t know!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TxHoops said:

My guy has been to bible study ;) 

(By the way, i think it’s hilariously ironic that we can agree that one thing we do know, is that we don’t know!)

It sure is ironic. This is the whole philosophy of the so-called and hilariously labeled "deniers". Too bad this philosophy is taken to heart instead of the worshipping at the feet of those who proclaim "the debate is over".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PhatMack19 said:

What the hell is a Bomb Cyclone?  Al Gore is full of crap.  We have frozen hurricanes about to hit to the east coast and I’m not talking about the drink.  

 

This is the hidden content, please

Al Gore is the most prominent Flim-Flam man in history (except L. Ron Hubbard).  What a lick.  I love the way Greg Bostwick rolls his eyes when they start talking Polar Vortex.  Imo, The Weather Channel could hire Greg and fire all their prognosticators.  Been watching him since he was a pup.  Best in the business for my money.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I notice that, quite often, the word "science" is used as a suggestion that there is no question about the global warming debate.  That same "science", for years, had alleged that vitamin supplements were beneficial.  I know many people for whom Vitamin D was prescribed  by a physician ( based upon "scientific evidence")to help address the bone loss issue as a result of advancing age.  If anyone has noticed, in the last few days, "science" has stated that there is no benefit in taking these supplements

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stevenash said:

I notice that, quite often, the word "science" is used as a suggestion that there is no question about the global warming debate.  That same "science", for years, had alleged that vitamin supplements were beneficial.  I know many people for whom Vitamin D was prescribed  by a physician ( based upon "scientific evidence")to help address the bone loss issue as a result of advancing age.  If anyone has noticed, in the last few days, "science" has stated that there is no benefit in taking these supplements

This "science" is usually funded by drug companies.  So...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, stevenash said:

My point was the FACT that science sometimes discovers that its "evidence" is incorrect.  Therefore, attaching the word scientific ( favorite of global warming purveyors)to an explanation does not necessarily confirm indisputable accuracy.

True!  And my fact would also be "follow the money!"  AlGore made a lot of money on this global warming scam.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, TxHoops said:

My guy has been to bible study ;) 

(By the way, i think it’s hilariously ironic that we can agree that one thing we do know, is that we don’t know!)

 

rev 13

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

 

rev 13

16 And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:

17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

We were talking Matthew 24:36

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    NEWton86
    Newest Member
    NEWton86
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Not yet, anyway. If you can't see that there has been a strong effort to create gender dysphoria amongst young folks AND try to keep it from parents in many instances, you're not paying attention. You may not care about this, but it's ridiculous to ridicule those that do. There is an agenda behind this, no doubt about it, like bullets pointed out earlier, it's just a name change...for now.
    • Bullard 10  LCM - 4  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
    • The problem our buddy @CardinalBacker has is that the Dems have been cheating Trump since before his inauguration.  There's 4 cheats going on right now against a private citizen.  But yet he wants us to believe that the 2020 election was squeaky clean.  No cheating what so ever.  That a brain dead individual got 81 million votes.  But the other guy that was supposed to be so bad got 74 million, the most any President ever got for reelection.  Evil people don't turn on and off their evil cheating ways.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...