Jump to content

Repub Wins Ga House Seat in Most Expensive Race in History


Hagar

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Fee Dee said:

Evidently, the conservatives are getting their people to the polls. Let's see the end results, then we will see who is laughing.

We've seen the end results of Liberal debauchery in the last decade, culminating in Obama's election with a super majority in Congress. America overwhelming rejected this looney, pathetic, and sanctimonious agenda and is now somewhat righting itself. The evidence is the Liberal agenda losing over 1100 seats since the midterms of Bush II.Nobody was laughing during the lunatic Liberal reign perpetuated by Obama...too much suffering. Now it's just good ol' American values re-asserting itself, stymied by self-righteous elitists pulling the puppet strings of the naïve and ignorant. Thank God the adults are now in charge...although I hold no optimism that the current regime is much better...just enough to right the ship to get us back on the right track. I fear that this track will be short lived, and is not even close to the optimal path. I therefore reiterate my desire for secession, in the strongest possible sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dimms embarrassed again!   I understand this clown got 90% of his money from outside the district.  BTW, a district, I also understand, he didn't even live in!

This is the hidden content, please

I guess it's true!  The man could not even vote for himself in the election.  SMH!!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Englebert said:

We've seen the end results of Liberal debauchery in the last decade, culminating in Obama's election with a super majority in Congress. America overwhelming rejected this looney, pathetic, and sanctimonious agenda and is now somewhat righting itself. The evidence is the Liberal agenda losing over 1100 seats since the midterms of Bush II.Nobody was laughing during the lunatic Liberal reign perpetuated by Obama...too much suffering. Now it's just good ol' American values re-asserting itself, stymied by self-righteous elitists pulling the puppet strings of the naïve and ignorant. Thank God the adults are now in charge...although I hold no optimism that the current regime is much better...just enough to right the ship to get us back on the right track. I fear that this track will be short lived, and is not even close to the optimal path. I therefore reiterate my desire for secession, in the strongest possible sense.

Secession!?   Image may contain: 1 person, beard and text

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Fee Dee said:

Evidently, the conservatives are getting their people to the polls. Let's see the end results, then we will see who is laughing.

Just wait until next year, right? ...lol

Don't confuse conservatives with liberals, they don't "get" their people to the polls (not even in buses).

Obama's policies have been the most effective cause in getting conservatives to the polls.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Englebert said:

We've seen the end results of Liberal debauchery in the last decade, culminating in Obama's election with a super majority in Congress. America overwhelming rejected this looney, pathetic, and sanctimonious agenda and is now somewhat righting itself. The evidence is the Liberal agenda losing over 1100 seats since the midterms of Bush II.Nobody was laughing during the lunatic Liberal reign perpetuated by Obama...too much suffering. Now it's just good ol' American values re-asserting itself, stymied by self-righteous elitists pulling the puppet strings of the naïve and ignorant. Thank God the adults are now in charge...although I hold no optimism that the current regime is much better...just enough to right the ship to get us back on the right track. I fear that this track will be short lived, and is not even close to the optimal path. I therefore reiterate my desire for secession, in the strongest possible sense.

Don’t forget: the president needed a supermajority because of the Republicans’ unprecedented use of the filibuster as an obstruction tactic — they’ve used it 

This is the hidden content, please
400 times.

But here’s the deal — the real deal — there actually wasn’t a two year supermajority.

This is the hidden content, please
 shows the facts.

President Obama was sworn in on January 20, 2009 with just 58 Senators to support his agenda.

He should have had 59, but Republicans contested Al Franken’s election in Minnesota and he didn’t get seated for seven months.

The President’s cause was helped in April when Pennsylvania’s Republican Senator Arlen Specter switched parties.

That gave the President 59 votes — still a vote shy of the super majority.

But one month later, Democratic Senator Byrd of West Virginia was hospitalized and was basically out of commission.

So while the President’s number on paper was 59 Senators — he was really working with just 58 Senators.

Then in July, Minnesota Senator Al Franken was finally sworn in, giving President Obama the magic 60 — but only in theory, because Senator Byrd was still out.

You Guys are full of misinformation!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Fee Dee said:

I'm willing to discuss facts, but I see mostly opinions here.

Perhaps you would like to discuss these facts:  The Repubs won last night in Georgia and South Carolina.  They have a majority in the House, the Senate, and Governors seats.  They also have a plurality in state legislatures.   Do you think there is a message there?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fee Dee said:

Don’t forget: the president needed a supermajority because of the Republicans’ unprecedented use of the filibuster as an obstruction tactic — they’ve used it 

This is the hidden content, please
400 times.

But here’s the deal — the real deal — there actually wasn’t a two year supermajority.

This is the hidden content, please
 shows the facts.

President Obama was sworn in on January 20, 2009 with just 58 Senators to support his agenda.

He should have had 59, but Republicans contested Al Franken’s election in Minnesota and he didn’t get seated for seven months.

The President’s cause was helped in April when Pennsylvania’s Republican Senator Arlen Specter switched parties.

That gave the President 59 votes — still a vote shy of the super majority.

But one month later, Democratic Senator Byrd of West Virginia was hospitalized and was basically out of commission.

So while the President’s number on paper was 59 Senators — he was really working with just 58 Senators.

Then in July, Minnesota Senator Al Franken was finally sworn in, giving President Obama the magic 60 — but only in theory, because Senator Byrd was still out.

You Guys are full of misinformation!

And your point? Why didn't you address the fact that Democrats have lost 1100 seats during Obama's reign? That's a more salient point than debating the technicalities of whether Obama actually had a supermajority for a few less months. And I never said he had a supermajority for a full two years. I just said he had a supermajority. You are trying to argue a point that exists only in your head, then have the nerve to add the condescending qualifier that ironically seems to fit you way better than us.

And would you like to discuss secession? I've stated on here numerous times I'm highly in favor of it, and wish it would happen immediately. I have little hope in America righting the ship from the looney path of Liberalism/Socialism. This is extremely evident right now listening to Conservatives debating on how they want to socialize our healthcare system. And it's typical of a Liberal to try to ridicule a topic through a silly meme. That's the surest way of trying to reveal your feelings without revealing your feelings. You have to have that defense of deniability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As you know Englebert, I agree wholeheartedly.  Even more so now after watching that video of the Evergreen college students.  If our institutions of higher learning are turning out anarchist like this, I doubt America, as we know it, will last much longer in the scheme of things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,951
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Or a less lethal option would be to have law enforcement yell improper pronouns at them...they'd scatter like sheep. I still prefer your way, lol.
    • I ve seen this done in several other countries.  And in those countries it happens very lil because of the severity of the consequences.   I saw a video of other world leaders ask “why does America allow such destructiveness” when all the civil unrest was happening because a criminal/criminals were killed  by not following commands.     we have a great system in place but it’s been compromised and we could still learn from other countries.
    • I am out of VOTES, but I will give a BIG AMEN!!!!
    • You start opening fire and drop about 10 or 12 of these protesting morons it will break up pretty quick.    This ties in with killing the chicken killing dog.
    • This is an easy one. We have let grifter unqualified coaches infiltrate our children and convince them that they will be D1 athletes if they only focus on a single sport. We've got kids, with single digit ages, playing their sport year-round to "maximize exposure" despite the fact that most college coaches on the recruiting trail will value a multisport athlete. This translates to the school year and ends up with kids being football, basketball, baseball only kids. Track is pretty much the only one left that keeps kids playing other sports and that's primarily because football coaches demand their football kids be track athletes. I literally talked to a man last night, who just moved to Texas from Oklahoma who was telling me his kid played on two different football teams during the season last year. One for his school, one for his select league. During the week the kid was a RB for his school, and on the weekends, he was a QB for his select team. This would equal 7 days a week of full contact football for a 6th grader......6th grader. Once that ends, rolls straight into 7 on 7 for the spring and back to football in the summer. All this for a kid, who seems to be a good athlete, but probably has a ceiling of D2 at best, if he doesn't burn out before that. Parents are silly and think they can develop their kids into being the next Quinn Ewers, but they completely miss the biggest factor in creating that type of athlete.....genetics. Genetics are undefeated. Always have been, always will be. Play sports because you love to compete then compete in everything you do. Quit giving bullsheet rings to "state champions" every single weekend all over the US and get back to valuing team championships won at the community level to build the continuity when they are young. This is the only way to reestablish the pride once felt by every kid in every town across Texas when they got to put on a uniform with their school colors. Otherwise, we can kiss the magic of high school sports goodbye. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...