Jump to content

Is There Still A Need For A Special Counsel?

Reagan

By Reagan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, new tobie said:

This is the hidden content, please

With this dictator as president. No!

Why do you call him a dictator? Please explain yourself. We can only hope, but history has shown you will again run and hide, only to spout your unsubstantiated and hateful rhetoric at a later date. And the laughter continues.

I'm not a fan of Trump, but I'll give him one thing...he sure has the uncanny ability to allow Liberals to show their true colors as the party of hate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
14 hours ago, new tobie said:

This is the hidden content, please

With this dictator as president. No!

Wow, that is just down right laughable. For the last 8 years we've had a Napoleon wannabe...spying on journalists and their families, especially ones he didn't like, spying on presidential campaigns, spying on every American in general, directing the I.R.S. to target certain people/groups, attempting to control every American's healthcare, ignoring foreign countries hacking into American public and private sectors, including every military branch, disparaging our policemen, providing a slush fund for Democrat causes by weaponizing the EPA, filling our courts with unbelievably biased and partisan judges, ignoring Federal laws, especially ones regarding illegal immigration, circumventing Congress' authority through executive actions, closing Federal parks in a hissie fit because he was denied running the country into even deeper debt, invoking executive privileged over documents that could show wrongdoing in the death of an American enforcement officer...there is so much more material, but I'm strained to the point of breaking just thinking about that wannabe dictator. And you have the nerve to call Trump a dictator after watching Obama's antics. That's just pathetic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Englebert said:

Wow, that is just down right laughable. For the last 8 years we've had a Napoleon wannabe...spying on journalists and their families, especially ones he didn't like, spying on presidential campaigns, spying on every American in general, directing the I.R.S. to target certain people/groups, attempting to control every American's healthcare, ignoring foreign countries hacking into American public and private sectors, including every military branch, disparaging our policemen, providing a slush fund for Democrat causes by weaponizing the EPA, filling our courts with unbelievably biased and partisan judges, ignoring Federal laws, especially ones regarding illegal immigration, circumventing Congress' authority through executive actions, closing Federal parks in a hissie fit because he was denied running the country into even deeper debt, invoking executive privileged over documents that could show wrongdoing in the death of an American enforcement officer...there is so much more material, but I'm strained to the point of breaking just thinking about that wannabe dictator. And you have the nerve to call Trump a dictator after watching Obama's antics. That's just pathetic.

Come on, Englebert.   Tobie may even agree with everything you have indicated, but he believes "grab em" is far more important/relevant.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
westend1

westend1

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, REBgp said:

Bad enough it's a witch hunt, but now Mueller bringing in left wing lawyers by the dozens.  This is going to be expensive.

Wonder if a special council and several dozen conservative lawyers could find anything on Obama or the Dems?

This is the hidden content, please

They tried.  How many Benghazi hearings did we have?  Seems nobody was worried about taxpayer cost then.  And, we all knew what happened within days of the incident.  Not enough security for the situation.  But, the Pubs were determined to try and blame that on Hillary.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites
nappyroots

nappyroots

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, westend1 said:

They tried.  How many Benghazi hearings did we have?  Seems nobody was worried about taxpayer cost then.  And, we all knew what happened within days of the incident.  Not enough security for the situation.  But, the Pubs were determined to try and blame that on Hillary.   

The outcome if the hearings didn't matter to republicans .  They had already made a ruling on their own.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
stevenash

stevenash

Posted
Posted
33 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Fast and furious.  A lower level agent decided to let guns walk and use them as bait to catch bigger fish.   It backfired.  How much money was spent trying to pin that on Obama? 

Yes and in the case of Lois Lerner, Mr. Obama found out about it in the newspaper just like the rest !

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, westend1 said:

They tried.  How many Benghazi hearings did we have?  Seems nobody was worried about taxpayer cost then.  And, we all knew what happened within days of the incident.  Not enough security for the situation.  But, the Pubs were determined to try and blame that on Hillary.   

Come on we1, I expect better of you.  Surely you know the difference between a congressional hearing and a special counsel?  Maybe not.  

Please just answer a simple question.  Yes or no will do, but feel free to elaborate if you feel it's needed.  Did Obama and Hillary lie to the families of the deceased, and the American people about what caused the Bengazi slaughter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Englebert

Englebert

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, westend1 said:

Fast and furious.  A lower level agent decided to let guns walk and use them as bait to catch bigger fish.   It backfired.  How much money was spent trying to pin that on Obama? 

It's impossible or incredibly difficult to pin it on Obama since Obama sealed the Fast And Furious documents using executive privilege...similar to firing the prosecuting attorney. Where was the outrage then?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,972
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • myrecordwashorrible
      SFA back to Southland

      By myrecordwashorrible · Posted

      A few Board of Regents agree for sure. Some administrative changes were based in large part on those moves.  Sam Houston is the only one this remotely did any service and of course they moved on as well. 
    • Chester86
      It's a great day in SETX!

      By Chester86 · Posted

      The greatest point on all of this, and exactly what makes it a great day in SE Texas is the commercials are over!!!!  Phelan wasn’t all bad, Covey wasn’t all bad, but by the end of it I would have voted for Brewster’s “None of the above!”  Politicians serve their own interests and everyone’s politician is bad (except for theirs of course).  I personally am for: 1) Higher fuel prices, 2) More taxes and restrictions on private property owners, 3) Cancelling student-loan and even credit card debt, 4) Covid restrictions (bring back masks) 5) Giving more tax money away to countries at war (except Israel), 6) Tearing apart the nuclear family 7) Supporting college kids to protest anything and everything they want with no consequences, 😎 Higher and higher food prices 😎  Go Biden/Harris - just MASA (Make America Soft Again), Beto for a high-cabinet spot.
    • 1970
      It's a great day in SETX!

      By 1970 · Posted

      Thanks for the info, I didn't check the primary vote count.  I was posing that, based on anecdotal evidence, many who did not vote in the primary showed up for the runoff, and apparently voted for Phelan.  My next door neighbors were two that voted runoff only and voted for Covey, so it went both ways I guess.   The Houston Chronicle posted quotes from Covey accusing many Dems of voting in the runoff.  Obviously if they were able to vote in the runoff then they didn't vote in the primary, unless the voted in the Rep primary to begin with of course. .  "Covey’s campaign released a lengthy statement after the results came in, calling Phelan an “Austin swamp creature and King of the Democrats.” The campaign accused Phelan of courting Democrat voters in Jefferson County to bolster his early vote numbers, but Covey did not say he would seek a recount." Anyway, it looks like it's a done deal, until November. 
    • Ty Cobb
      Defending World Series Champion Texas Rangers 2024 Season Thread

      By Ty Cobb · Posted

      WooHoo, the RANGERS win today 6-1 and win the series with arizona. 1st series win in the last 6. Maybe things are starting to change!!!
    • 89Falcon
      Regional Finals - Orangefield vs. Franklin - Post Game Info Here!

      By 89Falcon · Posted

      That is what I thought but I figured you folks would be able to find it for sure. Was a little tougher back then with fewer teams in the playoffs. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...