Jump to content

Shouldn't Lynch Recuse


baddog

Recommended Posts

This was inevitable.  The FBI was going to roll it to Lynch and the DOJ.  Then Bill & Lynch had their Conference on the Tarmac.  So the hot potato ended up with the FBI.   And they, as nicely as I can say this, fubar as well as you can fubar.

That blindfolded lady with the Scales of Justice in her hand, that blindfold isn't working anymore.  She can see.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Laws are for little people

This is the hidden content, please

 

Quote:

What is even more shocking is that according to Comey, "we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts."


Well, we did.

 Here is the 

This is the hidden content, please
to "unauthorized removal and retention of classified materials" without malicious intent, in other words precisely what the FBI alleges Hillary did (h/t 
This is the hidden content, please
)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Personally, I believe that even a charge of negligence, even without the "criminal" charge, to be enough to forbid anyone from holding public office. If Hillary cannot be trusted with "TOP SECRET" information, how can anyone trust her with anything less? That's what some view as persidential material? My God, where has common sense gone from these folks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

36 minutes ago, baddog said:

Personally, I believe that even a charge of negligence, even without the "criminal" charge, to be enough to forbid anyone from holding public office. If Hillary cannot be trusted with "TOP SECRET" information, how can anyone trust her with anything less? That's what some view as persidential material? My God, where has common sense gone from these folks?

Seems like none of it was marked "top secret"  That is the whole issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, westend1 said:

Seems like none of it was marked "top secret"  That is the whole issue.

Ok smart guy. Highly classified documnets. Let's split hairs on the competence of a freakin secretary of state's handling of sensitive information. I still wonder how anyone can overlook this and vote for her.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, baddog said:

Ok smart guy. Highly classified documnets. Let's split hairs on the competence of a freakin secretary of state's handling of sensitive information. I still wonder how anyone can overlook this and vote for her.

The same uninformed voters that put the current dumbarse in the last 8 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, westend1 said:

Seems like none of it was marked "top secret"  That is the whole issue.

Many were marked Classified, and some were marked with the highest Top Secret classification at the time received/sent.

Does it not bother you that a person who is charged with marking documents as classified, and has completed a training course in document classification, doesn't possess the skill set to identify classified material when she sees it? That's like an assistant coach posting the team's playbook online. When question, he says he didn't know it was secret. Then says he is applying for the head coach position.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Englebert said:

Many were marked Classified, and some were marked with the highest Top Secret classification at the time received/sent.

Does it not bother you that a person who is charged with marking documents as classified, and has completed a training course in document classification, doesn't possess the skill set to identify classified material when she sees it? That's like an assistant coach posting the team's playbook online. When question, he says he didn't know it was secret. Then says he is applying for the head coach position.

Great analogy Englebert.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,963
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



×
×
  • Create New...