Jump to content

**Silsbee Tigers vs El Campo Ricebirds** Regionals


Recommended Posts

You scored 35 on Sealy.  Now,  you're going to score how many on El Campo? Seriously? 

That is a good question!  Seally limited our possessions and ECs running game may very well do the same.  My question is how fast overall is El Campo?  I know they r going to be tough to stop,  but hopefully our speed will be the equalizer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

El Campo likes to mix the pass and run up as well. They will suck you in and throw over the top. I just saw some highlights of them on YouTube. Dove is 230lbs. I think he plays lb as well. Silsbee will have their hands full. If our offense is rolling, Silsbee will be fine. This will be the best running back Silsbee has faced this year. Maybe best OL as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You scored 35 on Sealy.  Now,  you're going to score how many on El Campo? Seriously? 

35 with two certain TD passes dropped. Thought Silsbee should have scored 42 for sure. It was Sealy's offense that kept the scoring lower than normal.

I personally think Sealy's defense is better than El Campo's, but that's just me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Silsbee defense worries me big time. There are a very poor tackling team. I have no idea why they don't run blitz or load the box vs Sealy. Sealy ran the same 5 plays all night with about 6 pass when in 3rd and long. They played with a backup rb and a backup qb. If Silsbee loads the box and put more size on the that line they can stop the run. Silsbee coaches need to figure out how to make adjustments and stop the run. 

These coaches have been making adjustments for a long time. Defense will be ready. "Bend don't Break"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seriously???? Only 35 against a Sealy team playing without their two best players.  I'm thinking an El Campo win.

35 against their defense....which wasn't missing anyone.  Their offense did ok but could not overcome their player losses. 

Nothing New here people....

You want to beat Silsbee?

 Better score at LEAST 35 points, and do it with long sustaining drives.  THAT was how Sealy kept it close, along with an onside kick. Silsbee had the ball on offense for less than 16 mins!!, and still scored 35.  Bring your offense AND your defense if you want to beat the Smoke because the low odds are that Silsbee will score 28 points at minimum.

 

 

Edited by Silsbee92
Additional info added.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Has anyone seen El Campo play? I know that running back is like 6'0 230lbs Kevin Dove. 

I saw them play back in September.  Dove is a big back and tough to bring down.  He does not shy away from contact.  The QB Arrambide  is quick and can make things happen with his feet.  Defensively, they are bend but don't break.  They are opportunistic, If you make a mistake they make you pay for it.  They are well coached and disciplined.  I have not seen Silsbee, so I can not make any comparisons.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
    • Wake is about to go from Preseason #1 to the 1st team eliminated 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...