Jump to content

San AntonIo Players target Ref


CougarCal

Recommended Posts

They should be reinstated with any grades or test they missed during this time frame being an "A" and if they weren't already starters then they should be. 

an A+ for the hit heard Worldwide or………. 

 

 

"Nah, lets give lil johnny a participation ribbon for those tests, poor lil johnny didnt mean to hit that poor ol ref and cause himself to miss school. Those gosh darn adults boy I tell you what"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Ben_Baby: .@NISD has ruled the Jay players who attacked an official will be eligible to return to the school:

This is the hidden content, please

Well, after reading the attached article, Ben's tweet may be a little misleading.  Both Moreno and Rojas were sentenced to 75 days of alternative school.  They will get credit for the time that they have already spent in alternative school awaiting the hearing, but their return to Jay High will not be until January 15th.

Edited by WOSgrad
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Windham, funny ppl on here. What should this guy get then? 

 

This is the hidden content, please

To start with, any TEA licensing this cat has should be revoked.

Second, he should be subject to any and all criminal prosecution under any theory which can be even remotely advanced.  Perhaps tvc can shed light on that.

Third, he should be subject to civil action on behalf of the referee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, after reading the attached article, Ben's tweet may be a little misleading.  Both Moreno and Rojas were sentenced to 75 days of alternative school.  They will get credit for the time that they have already spent in alternative school awaiting the hearing, but their return to Jay High will not be until January 15th.

read his twitter feed now, its amazing. Ppl saying Windham for those kids, hmmph, I can only imagine what they will think for this coach lol. 

 

SFA85 was spot on with this issue btw. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To start with, any TEA licensing this cat has should be revoked.

Second, he should be subject to any and all criminal prosecution under any theory which can be even remotely advanced.  Perhaps tvc can shed light on that.

Third, he should be subject to civil action on behalf of the referee.

 #plusone will probably say the coach was "misunderstood" and just having a bad day. Hire him back to teach anger management classes at Jay High School.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Okay, this is all starting to get ridiculous:

This is the hidden content, please

Just gets more bizarre everyday.

 

This is the hidden content, please
 
This is the hidden content, please
This is the hidden content, please

Hearing in October will determine fate of players' future in football at John Jay.

This is the hidden content, please
 
This is the hidden content, please

UIL still waiting on a report from TASO. Also not certain for a ruling on coach Mack Breed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

To start with, any TEA licensing this cat has should be revoked.

Second, he should be subject to any and all criminal prosecution under any theory which can be even remotely advanced.  Perhaps tvc can shed light on that.

Third, he should be subject to civil action on behalf of the referee.

That is a very good question. I my opinion for him to be charged criminally, I think the students should be charged also since they were of legal age (in TX 10 years old) and knew that they were wrong. 

I think one of them was 17 so he is already an adult just like the coach. In TX at 17 you are criminally an adult, not 18 as some people believe. The 15 year old could be certified as an adult for a felony which this certainly appears as a valid charge (Aggravated Assault or Assault on Public Servant) and even as a juvenile can actually receive more time locked up than an adult if only charged as a misdemeanor. 

Part of the law on being responsible for the criminal conduct of another (meaning the players had to commit a crime) says that: acting with intent to promote or assist the commission of the offense, he solicits, encourages, directs, aids, or attempts to aid the other person to commit the offense

 It certainly seems to fit that the coach "encouraged" or "directed" someone to commit an offense..... assuming there is actually evidence that he did so. I have read unconfirmed reports that he claims to have said he told them to do it but later recanted saying that he only wanted to cover for the kids. That almost sounds like they all got together after the act to come up with an alibi. If that is true (and could be proven) and they gave statements to the police, then it possibly comes up with the additional criminal charge of False Report To A Peace Officer. It is roughly the same kind of crime as some federal crimes that cover various forms of obstruction of justice when it is just lying to law enforcement to cover up a crime. 

So the question becomes, do you charge all of them with the crime or crimes or simply allow it to be handled administratively which sometimes is the best interest of justice? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,988
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CougarCrazy124
    Newest Member
    CougarCrazy124
    Joined



×
×
  • Create New...