All Activity

No, they played in the state final in '92.

Agree 100%. Lot going on this week for many families. Also, sometimes kids just need a mental break.

Here’s another of your brethren. A makeshift flamethrower and yelling “free Palestine”, the libs should pat him on the back and say “good job”. Maybe one of your judges will step in and cover for him, you know, one of them dictator judges. [Hidden Content]

Here you go libs. What fair process should these lovable teens receive? Remember, never care about the victim. [Hidden Content]

Yes, I guess being swept by Missouri and Texas and also losing to the same UTSA team, coupled with not even making the tournament, and being the quickest team ever going from #1 to unranked, would most definitely be the reasoning behind such a post.

I don't think this had anything to do with commitment.

lol

Who changed the wording?

Barring a miracle UTSA is about to beat UT for the second time in 3 days and put them out. That UTSA lineup is stacked!

I never question Fuller. I think Bryant was the correct choice. Think about it, as awesome as Nutter is, she was coming off a no-hitter. Its extremely hard to replicate a phenomenal outing the next time for any athlete. Great thing for BH is about 2/3 of the team is Sophs. Including Bryant.

Makes some question their commitment to the program.

You now make the rules?

So, illegals cross the border, get rounded up and bused back to Mexico, but that’s not considered a deportation due to wording. You libs stop at nothing. What a joke you and your party have truly become. Just like Obama’s cages for detention are called concentration camps under Trump. Your party is trash. You defend illegals over real Americans…..including gang members, hamas, and cartels. Why don’t you go to Colorado and throw molotav cocktails at Jews. I hear that’s the new trend. You should be proud.

No issue with the question. It’s a valid one. I basically already answered it in my response to SmashMouth earlier. It doesn’t fit a pure Libertarian Party mantra. Just like the Libertarian Party supports open borders. However, there are as many different types of libertarians (little L) as there are liberals & conservatives. I am a limited government/states rights fiscally conservative libertarian. Again, little L. I recognize the need for government involvement in certain areas, and I don’t believe in open borders until we fix the welfare state. In those instances where government wants to be involved, It should go to the voters for approval. This is an instance that’s been shown to be very successful for cancer research using the Texas model, and the private sector is not ALWAYS the be-all-end-all. The private sector runs on profits as we all know. This effort—which will go before the voters as a possible Constitutional Amendment—would be using taxpayer money (with their permission) for a common cause that is projected to save money on State funded medical costs in the future, and generate tax revenue for Texas in the mean time. That’s what the Texas Cancer Research Institute does now, and has done since 2007. I don’t think it would be proposed if it didn’t have some monetary benefit for the State even if it is compassionate. And yes, being at the State level (closer to the people) makes a difference to me. Plus, it wouldn’t be a ‘government agency’ in that sense. It would be funded with taxpayer money, but run like a private entity with all grants peer reviewed and approved by ‘expert’ peers—not politicians—before authorization. It also would be audited like a business. I’m okay with it since it would be approved by the taxpayers paying for it for—hopefully—their benefit if needed. Texas has also shown to be good stewards for the Cancer Institute. It’s also a hybrid model of government/private sector. No real difference between it and funding University research—except overhead is capped at a much lower level, and the efforts would have to relocate to Texas. If it wasn’t being proposed to the voters, I’d have more questions. You should read the links I’ve posted. They’ll give you more info, and probably explain to you more why I’m okay with it. Chances are, it won’t help my wife. We’re on borrowed time already as she was diagnosed in 2018 & life expectancy is 6-8 years for most with her condition. But, hopefully it can help others. Basically, it’s a proven, good use of public funds in my estimation that would have public approval and more local control. Libertarian philosophy doesn’t mean no government. It means a limited, approved, justified government that doesn’t infringe on personal liberty. More people are libertarian than what they realize.

Did Obama deported the most illegals in history [Hidden Content]

Why would you know the number of hearings that took place? No one had to inform you. How many criminal trials other than deportaions take place in the US yearly. You don't know that answer do you. . While Barack Obama's administration did deport a significant number of people, there's no evidence to suggest these deportations were illegal. Here's a breakdown of the facts: High Deportation Numbers: The Obama administration deported more than 3 million individuals between 2009 and 2017. This is a higher number than any other president in American history, according to El Paso Matters. Focus on Criminals and Border Crossers: Obama's administration prioritized the deportation of individuals with criminal records and recent unauthorized border crossers. Expedited Removal: A large percentage of deportations were carried out through "expedited removal" processes, which don't involve a hearing before an immigration judge. This is a LEGALLY established procedure for certain categories of individuals, primarily those apprehended near the border or who have previously been deported. Legal Procedures: While the high number of deportations and the use of expedited removal drew criticism from some immigrant rights advocates, the procedures used were generally within the bounds of US immigration law.

Good question. I was told some just decided not to go.

one district could have 2 State Champions...

Wonder why the regular guys would not go to this......

Sure it does. It exposes your hypocritical ideology. So Obama didn’t give due process but Trump has to. Yeah, that’s as hypocritical as you and your ilk can get. My last post describes you to a tee. Your lame waaaa waaa doesn’t phase me. I will always expose libtards.

I will support 100%. I ask this out of genuine curiosity. How does a government funded research project fit the Libertarian political philosophy? Because it’s the State and not the Fed?

What about Obama?” Waaa waaa waaa. What about don’t cut it in a debate.

Yep, several host teams already out. Vandy just went down.

Unarmed citizens.