Jump to content

9/15 results


Bud Kilmer

Recommended Posts

Don’t think Nederland does a lot of talking in volleyball this year.  Nederland lost a lot from last year and it’s looks like they are just now putting it together a little bit.  Confident would probably not be a word for it.  Just hopeful for this young team playing three freshman and a sophomore.  I still would think Nederland gets it done in a tight match tonight.    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well it looks like Nederland wasn’t putting it together.  Took a step back this week. GCM handled them easily this evening. 

3 hours ago, NedPA said:

Don’t think Nederland does a lot of talking in volleyball this year.  Nederland lost a lot from last year and it’s looks like they are just now putting it together a little bit.  Confident would probably not be a word for it.  Just hopeful for this young team playing three freshman and a sophomore.  I still would think Nederland gets it done in a tight match tonight.    

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, THS99 said:

Looks like this district will be pretty much decided on Tuesday, BH vs GCM @ BH. 

GCM losses:  Humble, Foster, Dobie (2), LaPorte (2), Needville, Pasadena, Santa Fe

BH losses: St. Mary (OK), Dripping Springs, St. Johns, Lake Travis, Bishop Lynch, Grand Oaks, Vandegrift  

Note, BH swept Dobie, LaPorte, Foster.  

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Separation Scientist said:

GCM losses:  Humble, Foster, Dobie (2), LaPorte (2), Needville, Pasadena, Santa Fe

BH losses: St. Mary (OK), Dripping Springs, St. Johns, Lake Travis, Bishop Lynch, Grand Oaks, Vandegrift  

Note, BH swept Dobie, LaPorte, Foster.  

 

I’m aware of the records for each team, wins and losses.  The level of competition that BH has played is vastly superior to what GCM has faced. BH’s losses are against really good, and a few exceptional, teams. Let’s be honest, GCM’s losses are just against teams. I am fully expecting BH to win in 3, hence the district will be decided on Tuesday. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LCM beat Vidor 3-2.

Anybody know the rule on an entire team storming the court DURING play? During the 5th set, it was Vidor 12 LCM 13.  LCM players assumed the ball was dead but our kids dug it out of the net and hit it back over.  LCM's entire bench stormed the court to celebrate, then realized "oh crap they're still going" and ran off the court.  Refs never called it. Point ended up going to LCM which was a game altering point. 

Our coaches never realized this had happened as they were watching the play and the ball coming back over the net. 

Football - penalty would be enforced.

Soccer - it constitutes a forfeit. 

I would think that point should have went to Vidor which would have made it 13 all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Fortheloveofthegame said:

LCM beat Vidor 3-2.

Anybody know the rule on an entire team storming the court DURING play? During the 5th set, it was Vidor 12 LCM 13.  LCM players assumed the ball was dead but our kids dug it out of the net and hit it back over.  LCM's entire bench stormed the court to celebrate, then realized "oh crap they're still going" and ran off the court.  Refs never called it. Point ended up going to LCM which was a game altering point. 

Our coaches never realized this had happened as they were watching the play and the ball coming back over the net. 

Football - penalty would be enforced.

Soccer - it constitutes a forfeit. 

I would think that point should have went to Vidor which would have made it 13 all. 

Anyone got any video of this play? 

If they didn't interfere with the outcome why would Vidor get the point? Although premature it seems like a case of a random ball rolling through the court, some refs call it dead early and some use judgement that it didnt interfere with the play letting it go on.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Steven Avery said:

Anyone got any video of this play? 

If they didn't interfere with the outcome why would Vidor get the point? Although premature it seems like a case of a random ball rolling through the court, some refs call it dead early and some use judgement that it didnt interfere with the play letting it go on.  

Yes, and I would go out on a limb and say it will probably go to UIL.  The ball was never dead.  The whistle was never blown.  More than six people were on the court when a player hit the ball that was still in play.  I would think as soon as a player off the bench crosses the line and steps on the court, the play is immediately ruled dead and a replay happens, or the team with more than six on the court loses that point and it goes to the other team.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Fortheloveofthegame said:

Yes, and I would go out on a limb and say it will probably go to UIL.  The ball was never dead.  The whistle was never blown.  More than six people were on the court when a player hit the ball that was still in play.  I would think as soon as a player off the bench crosses the line and steps on the court, the play is immediately ruled dead and a replay happens, or the team with more than six on the court loses that point and it goes to the other team.  

Did the 7th man play the ball?  I hear what you are saying but if it didnt impact the play and was just cheering then its gonna be a nonfactor is my guess. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fortheloveofthegame said:

Yes, and I would go out on a limb and say it will probably go to UIL.  The ball was never dead.  The whistle was never blown.  More than six people were on the court when a player hit the ball that was still in play.  I would think as soon as a player off the bench crosses the line and steps on the court, the play is immediately ruled dead and a replay happens, or the team with more than six on the court loses that point and it goes to the other team.  

Or just play better and get the win that way? Lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was an official years ago and haven’t called a game in years… but me personally if I’m the official I’m not blowing the whistle unless play of the ball was interfered with . Also kinda one of those things where I’d have to be there in that situation…also possibly could’ve blown the play dead and replayed the point 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,957
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    NEWton86
    Newest Member
    NEWton86
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Not yet, anyway. If you can't see that there has been a strong effort to create gender dysphoria amongst young folks AND try to keep it from parents in many instances, you're not paying attention. You may not care about this, but it's ridiculous to ridicule those that do. There is an agenda behind this, no doubt about it, like bullets pointed out earlier, it's just a name change...for now. And it was only very recently that girls were allowed to join the "boy scouts", they have been allowed to join certain other groups that weren't available to girls at the time. It's the frog in the slow boil.
    • Bullard 10  LCM - 4  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • I’ve stated over and over that I don’t think that the hush money trial has merit. I also don’t think that the fraud/appraisals case in NYC had merit, either. I think that the evidence in the Election Tampering case down in Georgia is pretty damning, and the case about mishandling documents down in Florida is a real problem for Trump… because that’s what intelligent people do-look at the facts make sound decisions not based on their pwecious feewings.  You know, just saying “Bah! It’s all a bunch of lies because I love him!” Or “of course he did it! I hate him.” But thought processes are something most people are incapable of. They only manage to scroll social media for posts that validate their own opinions and them off as truth or fact when they are just outright lies… but they make the re-poster feel good inside so he believes them without question.    Every time I soundly refute the  idea that trump was good for the economy, y’all yell “but COVID!” His tax cuts provided a short term bubble in the economy by way of an exploding deficit and debt that our grandkids will still be paying interest upon 50 years from now even prior to COVID.  It’s like when Mama takes over the family finances, maxes out all of the credit cards and drives the family into bankruptcy.  Y’all would be the spoiled brat, immature and stupid children that spout off “things were so much better when Mom was handling the finances! We had everything we wanted! Put her back in charge!” Anybody that says “Trump was good for the economy” is just letting they world known that they don’t understand micro/macro economics or the effects of rising interest rates have on a debt the size of ours.    What none of you seem to realize is that the problems were facing today (interest rates and inflation) would be occurring even if Trump were in office because his fiscal policies are more flawed than either conservatives or liberals.    Libs: we should raise taxes on the rich and spend more! Conservatives: We should cut taxes on everybody but cut spending!   Trump: We’re gonna cut taxes and spend more!    It’s a recipe for pure disaster. He’s literally the guy who says “we’re gonna buy high, sell low, and make it up in volume!”    
    • The problem our buddy @CardinalBacker has is that the Dems have been cheating Trump since before his inauguration.  There's 4 cheats going on right now against a private citizen.  But yet he wants us to believe that the 2020 election was squeaky clean.  No cheating what so ever.  That a brain dead individual got 81 million votes.  But the other guy that was supposed to be so bad got 74 million, the most any President ever got for reelection.  Evil people don't turn on and off their evil cheating ways.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...