Jump to content

100% of Democrats Vote Against Stopping Men From Infiltrating Women’s Sports!

Reagan

By Reagan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted

McCarthy celebrates House passage of bill protecting women’s sports, says vote fulfills GOP promise!  The House passed the Protection of Women and Girls in Sports Act on a 219-203 vote without any Democrat support.  Folks, the devil's take over of the Democratic party is just about complete!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted

Yeah.... this is another area where I think the Dems just get it wrong.  You did all of that "good" work with Title IX and then destroy womens' sports by catering to the cross dressers.  

They claim to be the party of women, but obviously chose the "T's" when it came down to women vs the Alphabet Mafia.  Kinda like claiming to be party that supports minorities, but they really don't have an answer for the Latino population.  If you're black and broke, it's oppression, privilege, systemic racism, 400,000 years of slavery here in America, etc...  If you're brown and broke, they really don't have an answer for you.... other than "you need to support our black brethren."

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, TxHoops said:

This issue is beyond stupid.  I can’t even believe it’s a thing. Change your sex or whatever all you want. But you don’t do it and expect to compete against our daughters.  That’s lunacy and a good way to push swing voters to the right. 

And, you have a Supreme Court Justice that doesn’t know the definition of a woman.  The whole Democrat party and their ideals are stupid.  It is beyond belief how anyone would cast a vote for a Democrat.  There really are a lot of stupid people out there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, BS Wildcats said:

And, you have a Supreme Court Justice that doesn’t know the definition of a woman.  The whole Democrat party and their ideals are stupid.  It is beyond belief how anyone would cast a vote for a Democrat.  There really are a lot of stupid people out there.

It’s as dumb politically as it is in practicality.  It never ceases to amaze me how truly out of touch with reality these idiots are who govern us.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullets13

bullets13

Posted
Posted

I’m all for people doing what they want and being who they want to be, no matter how silly or crazy it seems to me.  But the second that those choices affect other people, whether it be in sports, or little girls having to use the restroom next to grown men, or any other related issue, my support for your “rights” drops to zero.  The idea that the feelings of .5% of the population are more important that the fairness and safety of all women is absolutely absurd.  I’m reminded of a little blurb from Family Guy I saw awhile back.  A bartender walks up to a lady sitting at the bar on her phone and says “excuse me ma’am, no porn at the bar.”  She replies “oh, it’s okay, I’m transgender.”  And the bartender says “oh, I had no idea. Do whatever you want, all the time.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
On 4/20/2023 at 2:47 PM, CardinalBacker said:

Yeah.... this is another area where I think the Dems just get it wrong.  You did all of that "good" work with Title IX and then destroy womens' sports by catering to the cross dressers.  

They claim to be the party of women, but obviously chose the "T's" when it came down to women vs the Alphabet Mafia.  Kinda like claiming to be party that supports minorities, but they really don't have an answer for the Latino population.  If you're black and broke, it's oppression, privilege, systemic racism, 400,000 years of slavery here in America, etc...  If you're brown and broke, they really don't have an answer for you.... other than "you need to support our black brethren."

Dems get it wrong across the board, not just this issue!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

Dems get it wrong across the board, not just this issue!

Wrong.... they're on the right side of the fact that the ultra rich aren't paying taxes like the rest of us.   If you have your own jet with gold faucets/fixtures, yet contribute NOTHING in personal income tax, that's not right... even if it's legal.   If Jeff Bezos has enough dough to build the largest yacht on earth, yet pays NOTHING in personal income tax, that's not right... even if it's legal.  You can't get republicans to admit this, though.

 

More importantly, Democrats can come together and get legislation passed and create fundamental change.  There's always a Rand Paul, John McCain, etc. waiting to stop any potential legislation that Republicans supposedly want.  Kinda like all we heard for years was "Repeal and Replace," but when the Rs held all of the cards they took a swing at it, failed, then said "well, we tried.... how about more tax breaks for the rich?"

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

Wrong.... they're on the right side of the fact that the ultra rich aren't paying taxes like the rest of us.   If you have your own jet with gold faucets/fixtures, yet contribute NOTHING in personal income tax, that's not right... even if it's legal.   If Jeff Bezos has enough dough to build the largest yacht on earth, yet pays NOTHING in personal income tax, that's not right... even if it's legal.  You can't get republicans to admit this, though.

 

More importantly, Democrats can come together and get legislation passed and create fundamental change.  There's always a Rand Paul, John McCain, etc. waiting to stop any potential legislation that Republicans supposedly want.  Kinda like all we heard for years was "Repeal and Replace," but when the Rs held all of the cards they took a swing at it, failed, then said "well, we tried.... how about more tax breaks for the rich?"

If they’re playing by the legal rules, good for them.  The less money that goes to the government, the better.

By the way, if the big bad rich paid more taxes, it wouldn’t improve yours or anyone else's life one bit, it would simply allow for more government waste.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
5GallonBucket

5GallonBucket

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

If they’re playing by the legal rules, good for them.  The less money that goes to the government, the better.

By the way, if the big bad rich paid more taxes, it wouldn’t improve yours or anyone else's life one bit, it would simply allow for more government waste.

Cut govt positions.

I see it in all entities that govt touches both state and federal.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, CardinalBacker said:

Wrong.... they're on the right side of the fact that the ultra rich aren't paying taxes like the rest of us.   If you have your own jet with gold faucets/fixtures, yet contribute NOTHING in personal income tax, that's not right... even if it's legal.   If Jeff Bezos has enough dough to build the largest yacht on earth, yet pays NOTHING in personal income tax, that's not right... even if it's legal.  You can't get republicans to admit this, though.

 

More importantly, Democrats can come together and get legislation passed and create fundamental change.  There's always a Rand Paul, John McCain, etc. waiting to stop any potential legislation that Republicans supposedly want.  Kinda like all we heard for years was "Repeal and Replace," but when the Rs held all of the cards they took a swing at it, failed, then said "well, we tried.... how about more tax breaks for the rich?"

You sound like a good Democrat squawking about the tax issue.  Don’t you think the rich Dems take full advantage of the tax system, as well.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, BS Wildcats said:

You sound like a good Democrat squawking about the tax issue.  Don’t you think the rich Dems take full advantage of the tax system, as well.  

I didn't say anything about the political beliefs of the rich people who aren't paying ANY taxes like the rest of us do.

 

This is how you know that we're ALL stupid on both sides of the aisle.  You have poor people on one side voting D because they want more handouts, then you have poor people on the other side fighting so that a select few rich people don't have to pay taxes, in hopes that some of the crumbs might come their way.  

 

Your argument is that it's perfectly okay (not legal.... but okay) that we have a guy with multiple golf resorts, hotels, mansions, and a jet airliner of his very own that pays no personal income taxes?  But you'll turn around and argue about people on welfare getting EIC payments? It's baffling.   We have a progressive tax system where (in theory) people who earn more pay more taxes on the higher portion of their incomes... except the ultra rich pay nothing, and you're cool with that?  Because I'm not. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

If they’re playing by the legal rules, good for them.  The less money that goes to the government, the better.

By the way, if the big bad rich paid more taxes, it wouldn’t improve yours or anyone else's life one bit, it would simply allow for more government waste.

The fact that you post this (and I assume believe it), then have a handful of like-minded people "like" your post indicates how badly brainwashed that you all are. 

Patriots back in the late 1700s started a revolution over taxation by the British.  In 2023 you have "Patriots" who are cool with the ultra rich not paying anything while the rest of us do.  That's when you know you're dealing with morons. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,988
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    CougarCrazy124
    Newest Member
    CougarCrazy124
    Joined


  • Posts

    • tvc184
      Supreme Court overturns bump stock ban…

      By tvc184 · Posted

      Okay.  That is a good argument.  There is no law prohibiting the stocks and the Supreme Court was correct by the letter of the law and Constitution but citizens should refuse to buy them. If every person voluntarily turned theirs in and refused to buy any, I am okay with it. It won’t stop the willing from anything however. 
    • Reagan
      JoeBama -- Election Denier: AlGore 'Was Elected President'!

      By Reagan · Posted

      From the article:   "In some ways, the dispute over the 2000 presidential election will never end. Witness Vice President Biden's comments Wednesday about predecessor Al Gore. "This man was elected president of the United States of America," Biden said at a fundraiser that Gore also attended. "No, no, no. He was elected president of the United States of America." WOW!!  And no one was indicted for questioning the results an this election.  Amazing how times have changed.   This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up @Big girl  @UT alum  @CardinalBacker  @Boyz N Da Hood         What say you?!
    • baddog
      Supreme Court overturns bump stock ban…

      By baddog · Posted

      What you are failing to realize is this….. you act as if the only reason this person committed this heinous crime is because of bump stocks. My realization is that he would have done it anyway. Bump stocks did not create this crime, he did. You need to learn where that line really is. 
    • thetragichippy
      Supreme Court overturns bump stock ban…

      By thetragichippy · Posted

      If you want bump stocks banned, you are going to need Congress.
    • CardinalBacker
      Supreme Court overturns bump stock ban…

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      This is my point, made initially.   We, as gun owners, should demand accountability from those who manufacture and sell these things.  But instead we argue "but it's our RIGHT to own them," thereby insuring that another mass killing happens in the future.  At which point in time we'll wring our hands, offer thoughts and prayers, say how it's not a gun that kills, but rather a hard heart that kills.     Gun manufacturers and sellers don't mind threats from people who were never going to buy from them anyways.  If actual gun owners were to threaten a boycott of businesses that produce/sell bump stocks, they'd disappear from the market.  But instead we take the losing side of an argument on philosophical grounds.   We don't need the feds with more regulations or congress to pass new legislation... we, as consumers control the market.  What's available, etc.   WE, as the actual customers of weapons should be using our voices to determine what is produced/sold by the gun industry.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...