Jump to content

What about that!

UT alum

By UT alum
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted

None of Trump’s Supreme Court appointees or Trump acolyte’s husband Clarence Thomas objected to the one sentence turn down of Orange Jesus’ emergency ruling appeal concerning the top secret documents he stole and stashed at Mar-a-Lago. Doesn’t look good for the Lawless One. It’s all catching up with him, and his far right appointees obviously take their oath to “faithfully and impartially discharge the duties incumbent on me under the Constitution and laws of the United States” seriously.  Hubris always catches up with brazen egomaniacs. He ain’t fooling with New York City municipal officials. He’s in way over his head and sinking fast.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, UT alum said:

None of Trump’s Supreme Court appointees or Trump acolyte’s husband Clarence Thomas objected to the one sentence turn down of Orange Jesus’ emergency ruling appeal concerning the top secret documents he stole and stashed at Mar-a-Lago. Doesn’t look good for the Lawless One. It’s all catching up with him, and his far right appointees obviously take their oath to “faithfully and impartially discharge the duties incumbent on me under the Constitution and laws of the United States” seriously.  Hubris always catches up with brazen egomaniacs. He ain’t fooling with New York City municipal officials. He’s in way over his head and sinking fast.

So you are admitting that the vilified conservative (constitutional) judges are not swayed by politics?

 And SCOTUS only ruled that Trump can’t get the papers back for now. They made no ruling on any charges. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, tvc184 said:

So you are admitting that the vilified conservative (constitutional) judges are not swayed by politics?

 And SCOTUS only ruled that Trump can’t get the papers back for now. They made no ruling on any charges. 

He’s a lib. They read anything into it that they want, skipping the facts while starting  a useless thread. Trump only gets charged and convicted on the Internet. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT alum

UT alum

Posted
  • Author
Posted
7 hours ago, tvc184 said:

So you are admitting that the vilified conservative (constitutional) judges are not swayed by politics?

 And SCOTUS only ruled that Trump can’t get the papers back for now. They made no ruling on any charges. 

I never denied they weren’t swayed by politics. I don’t agree with their constitutional interpretations, but I don’t doubt their fealty to their oaths.  They implicitly affirmed that the documents are secret, and therefore had no business in Trump’s Mar-a-Lago bedroom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
45 minutes ago, UT alum said:

I never denied they weren’t swayed by politics. I don’t agree with their constitutional interpretations, but I don’t doubt their fealty to their oaths.  They implicitly affirmed that the documents are secret, and therefore had no business in Trump’s Mar-a-Lago bedroom.

All presidents have access to the nuclear codes. What could be more secretive than that? Hunter’s laptop contents?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
tvc184

tvc184

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, UT alum said:

I never denied they weren’t swayed by politics. I don’t agree with their constitutional interpretations, but I don’t doubt their fealty to their oaths.  They implicitly affirmed that the documents are secret, and therefore had no business in Trump’s Mar-a-Lago bedroom.

Where did you read that in the order? I read the Supreme Court response and all it said was that the request was denied.

A federal judge ordered a special master to review some documents to see if they could be released. The Eleventh Circuit appeals court put a halt to part of that order. A request was made to the Supreme Court to block the circuit court and let the special master (who is also a federal judge) continue.

 The Supreme Court chose in a one sentence response to stay out of it for now.

 Where in the order did you read the Supreme Court implicitly ruled anything about the documents which they haven’t seen? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Unwoke

Unwoke

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, UT alum said:

None of Trump’s Supreme Court appointees or Trump acolyte’s husband Clarence Thomas objected to the one sentence turn down of Orange Jesus’ emergency ruling appeal concerning the top secret documents he stole and stashed at Mar-a-Lago. Doesn’t look good for the Lawless One. It’s all catching up with him, and his far right appointees obviously take their oath to “faithfully and impartially discharge the duties incumbent on me under the Constitution and laws of the United States” seriously.  Hubris always catches up with brazen egomaniacs. He ain’t fooling with New York City municipal officials. He’s in way over his head and sinking fast.

Give it up! He’s not going to be disqualified from running for President again. Your Party is like that Psycho Girlfriend that want go away after the breakup because she’s so obsessed. In other words TDS! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, tvc184 said:

Where did you read that in the order? I read the Supreme Court response and all it said was that the request was denied.

A federal judge ordered a special master to review some documents to see if they could be released. The Eleventh Circuit appeals court put a halt to part of that order. A request was made to the Supreme Court to block the circuit court and let the special master (who is also a federal judge) continue.

 The Supreme Court chose in a one sentence response to stay out of it for now.

 Where in the order did you read the Supreme Court implicitly ruled anything about the documents which they haven’t seen? 

I suspect the only reply to this will be 🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗.  It’s the only thing left when you’ve been caught in a “gotcha” moment.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Hagar

Hagar

Posted
Posted
On 10/16/2022 at 8:33 AM, BS Wildcats said:

You’re right, nothing.  That’s typical of UT alum.  Start a thread, get proven wrong with facts, then tuck tail and run.

Still running I guess.  How embarrassing.  Everything the Dem Party does is wrong.  The folks supporting them are wrong.  Why they try is beyond me.  Be better off crawling back under a rock and not reveal their stupidity.

As the old saying goes, “better to be quiet and thought a fool than to open your mouth and remove all doubt”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Setx fan
      2024 Newton Eagles football.

      By Setx fan · Posted

      He's steadily improving rapidly. Not that your opinion matters much based on some of the wild projections you've made on this site 
    • baddog
      BRAGG'S STAR WITNESS

      By baddog · Posted

      Cohen……a lying, backstabbing pos who does nothing but lie every time he opens his mouth. Let him utter words the prosecution wants to hear, and we can convict. Cohen told his ex advisor that he wanted to kill himself. What a worldly loss that would be. Let anyone on this board be put through the wringer with false charges and lies like Trump has had to endure, and you would be screaming at the top of your lungs how illegal all of this is.
    • Separation Scientist
      BRAGG'S STAR WITNESS

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      It was and remains perfectly timed and choregraphed Kangaroo Court, whatever Cohen just said or lied about.  Face it, under Soros installed Biden and Merrick Garland, the USA is now officially a Bananna Republic with a Goverment that weaponizes itself against and destroys its political rivals. Putin and Xi are SO proud!  Dang I miss Democracy.       
    • CardinalBacker
      BRAGG'S STAR WITNESS

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • bullets13
      Governor Abbott pardons Daniel Perry for murder during protest…

      By bullets13 · Posted

      Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...