Jump to content

Americans already reacting to Biden's reported student loan handout plan: 'Highly suspicious'


LumRaiderFan

Recommended Posts

This is the hidden content, please

The democrats with yet another plan to accommodate freeloaders.

From the article:

President Joe Biden is today expected to announce a student loan handout plan that would essentially use taxpayer money to pay off up to $10,000 of student debt per borrower making under $125,000 per year.

That means Americans may be footing a nearly $300 billion bill if Biden goes through with the reported plan — plus extends a repayment pause to next year.

The nation's federal student debt now tops $1.6 trillion after ballooning for years. More than 43 million Americans have federal student debt, with almost a third owing less than $10,000 and more than half owing less than $20,000, according to the latest federal data.

Many hardworking, play-by-the-rules Americans have diligently paid off their student loans as a matter of personal responsibility. They believe in taking care of their obligations; for them, it was and is the right thing to do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

This is the hidden content, please

The democrats with yet another plan to accommodate freeloaders.

From the article:

President Joe Biden is today expected to announce a student loan handout plan that would essentially use taxpayer money to pay off up to $10,000 of student debt per borrower making under $125,000 per year.

That means Americans may be footing a nearly $300 billion bill if Biden goes through with the reported plan — plus extends a repayment pause to next year.

The nation's federal student debt now tops $1.6 trillion after ballooning for years. More than 43 million Americans have federal student debt, with almost a third owing less than $10,000 and more than half owing less than $20,000, according to the latest federal data.

Many hardworking, play-by-the-rules Americans have diligently paid off their student loans as a matter of personal responsibility. They believe in taking care of their obligations; for them, it was and is the right thing to do.

 

The mid-twenty somethings that just graduated see it as more free stuff.  biden knows they have been brainwashed for four years by liberal faculty, so he is now just panning for votes!  The higher education system will be the downfall of America, not biden, although he is trying his best at it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Many of us are upset about funding other people's education.  The president of the NAACP is upset for a different reason:

"If the rumors are true, we've got a problem. And tragically, we’ve experienced this so many times before," NAACP President Derrick Johnson said in a statement on Tuesday. "This is not how you treat Black voters who turned out in record numbers and provided 90% of their vote to once again save democracy in 2020."

AKA: You think the votes you're buying from us are only worth 10k?

 

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

This is the hidden content, please

The democrats with yet another plan to accommodate freeloaders.

From the article:

President Joe Biden is today expected to announce a student loan handout plan that would essentially use taxpayer money to pay off up to $10,000 of student debt per borrower making under $125,000 per year.

That means Americans may be footing a nearly $300 billion bill if Biden goes through with the reported plan — plus extends a repayment pause to next year.

The nation's federal student debt now tops $1.6 trillion after ballooning for years. More than 43 million Americans have federal student debt, with almost a third owing less than $10,000 and more than half owing less than $20,000, according to the latest federal data.

Many hardworking, play-by-the-rules Americans have diligently paid off their student loans as a matter of personal responsibility. They believe in taking care of their obligations; for them, it was and is the right thing to do.

 

The way interest is accrued is criminal . Someone I know know borrowed 20 000. Ten years later she owes 18,000

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Big girl said:

The way interest is accrued is criminal . Someone I know know borrowed 20 000. Ten years later she owes 18,000

 

 

 

All you have to do is ask what the interest rate is before you take out the loan. At that point you should be able to figure out the amount of interest you would pay on the life of the loan.  If it’s not to your liking then you go to another lender. If you have horrible or no credit with very little assets then your going to pay a high interest because your considered high risk on defaulting on the loan.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure what JoeBama has done is legal.  Imagine that!  Think his home will get raided?!  LOL!!  Anyway, the Congress has passed laws concerning student loans.  Remember -- spending starts and stops with the House.  So, I have finally found something that N. Pelosi has got right:  "

Lawmakers, including Nancy Pelosi, have argued that Biden’s executive order, is unconstitutional and goes outside the rights of the executive branch.

Congress, not the president, is the only body that can cancel student debt, Pelosi said in July of 2021, arguing that “the president can’t do it.”

“Not everybody realizes that, but the president can only postpone, delay but not forgive” student loans, she added.

The Department of Education came to the same decision, arguing that the executive branch “does not have the statutory authority to cancel, compromise, discharge, or forgive, on a blanket or mass basis, principal balances of student loans, and/or to materially modify the repayment amounts or terms thereof.”

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer told Biden to provide as much relief as possible in a phone call Tuesday night, according to Politico, saying its “the right thing to do morally and economically.”

The total estimated cost for JoeBama’s one-time cancellation is $300 billion!

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Unwoke said:

All you have to do is ask what the interest rate is before you take out the loan. At that point you should be able to figure out the amount of interest you would pay on the life of the loan.  If it’s not to your liking then you go to another lender. If you have horrible or no credit with very little assets then your going to pay a high interest because your considered high risk on defaulting on the loan.

Apparently you don't know how student loans work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

Apparently she didn’t either. All lenders are required to disclose interest rates of loans wether they be a fixed rate or Variable rate along with all terms. 

One fills out a FAFSA form. They tell you if you qualify for a subsidized or unsubsidized loan. A student doesn't shop for lenders nor interest rates 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Big girl said:

One fills out a FAFSA form. They tell you if you qualify for a subsidized or unsubsidized loan. A student doesn't shop for lenders nor interest rates 

 

So your telling me you blindly sign an agreement not knowing the terms of that agreement? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Unwoke said:

All you have to do is ask what the interest rate is before you take out the loan. At that point you should be able to figure out the amount of interest you would pay on the life of the loan.  If it’s not to your liking then you go to another lender. If you have horrible or no credit with very little assets then your going to pay a high interest because your considered high risk on defaulting on the loan.

They don't look at interest rates or assets. Educate yourself. These are government backed loans

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, bullets13 said:

 

Many of us are upset about funding other people's education.  The president of the NAACP is upset for a different reason:

"If the rumors are true, we've got a problem. And tragically, we’ve experienced this so many times before," NAACP President Derrick Johnson said in a statement on Tuesday. "This is not how you treat Black voters who turned out in record numbers and provided 90% of their vote to once again save democracy in 2020."

AKA: You think the votes you're buying from us are only worth 10k?

 

This is the hidden content, please

In the article it says, “save democracy”.

No, the Black vote didn’t save democracy, it saved Democrats.

 There is a huge difference.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, baddog said:

If the government wants to raise taxes on the public, why forgive student loans? Seems like a conflict interest. 

True. It is a conflict of rational policy and buying votes.

I saw a comment on Facebook noting that Biden had promised to end student debt when he entered office.  The comment queried if he was concerned about student debt, why did he wait for more than a year and a half?

It is obviously because in January 2020, he had no need to buy votes. I can understand the conflict in his timing, he was busy the first week ending 93 million acres of offshore oil exploration by executive order.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,977
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • We'll see. I don't trust us. 
    • Starting pitching has been shaky the last few weeks due to some injuries outside of Hagen Smith.  He goes tomorrow, so y’all should be fine 
    • Manchin may get it but any mention of the radical left that wanted to get rid of the filibuster and end almost 220 years of history because the Democrats are mad?  The House and Senate are obviously different legislative bodies with entirely different election processes and rules for a reason. The House can vote on laws with a simple majority vote. The Senate put rules in place that it would make it much tougher to pass laws. Laws should be difficult to pass. The Senate is often the holdup of the right and left. It takes 60 votes to break the filibuster so any law will almost certainly require agreement at least in part, from opposing sides of an issue. Because they can’t get laws passed, the radical left is like a baby having a tantrum and wants to change over 200 years of history and make it potentially ridiculously easy to pass laws. I have seen current poll maps and it is possible for the Republicans to sweep into complete power in November but by the tiniest margin. That would possibly mean that a single vote margin in both houses could enact what you might call the radical right laws. There would be nothing that the Democrats could do to stop any legislation whatsoever if the left (they are all radical, minus Manchin) got their filibuster rule changed.  That is where the current filibuster comes into play as any new law would require several Democrats to agree with the majority Republicans and vice versa.  Do you want the potential for your radical right to have free rein as the radical left wants by killing the filibuster or is the radical left just as (if not more) dangerous? Let’s see if we have a history in this area? Oh yeah, the Democrats changed the rules in the Senate to allow federal judges to not have to overcome the filibuster. Obama was not getting his federal judge nominations passed and being angry, they changed the rules instead of nominating more moderate justices. They were warned that it would come back to bite them. They didn’t care and chose the nuclear option to change the rules. Oops! Any guess how Trump got all of his Supreme Court nominees passed against strong Democrat opposition? The Democrats got rid of the filibuster for federal judges after another tantrum   So when you are so worried about the radical right, are you equally concerned in what the radical left is always doing by changing rules and history which were put into place just for situations like we are in? So while Manchin gets it, what about his other 50 colleagues (49 + Harris)?  What concerns you more, Abbott and Paxton or the Democrats who want to make it to where if the Republicans do take over, they can go wild… at least in your mind? 
    • MODS please remove that ISD twitter link! I had no idea it would copy the whole posting. I only highlighted the portion about the venue change. Sorry about that!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...