Jump to content

Elon Musk Buys 9.2% of Twitter!!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, thetragichippy said:

They trying anything to stop this......but he got enough money to fight this and bankrupt the opposition.....

I read that his net worth goes up and down radically because of all of his ventures but has been as much recently as $300 billion. He could buy Donald Trump 30 times over.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

Twitter is considering a poison pill to thwart Elon Musk‘s offer. They would rather self-immolate than give up their censorship programs. This shows you how deeply committed they are to Orwellian control of the narratives and global discourse. Scary.

Just heard Elon say if plan A doesn't work -- he has a plan B!  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

 

So let me get this straight: The progressive left is now rooting FOR Saudi Arabia, Wall Street, Vanguard / Blackrock and AGAINST free speech, liberty and the dude who makes electric cars and is going to Mars?

 

What?

Lmbo, these folks jump from bed to bed.  😂😂😂

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Unwoke said:

 

So let me get this straight: The progressive left is now rooting FOR Saudi Arabia, Wall Street, Vanguard / Blackrock and AGAINST free speech, liberty and the dude who makes electric cars and is going to Mars?

 

What?

Politics makes strange bedfellows….

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Globalist Never-Trump Board Member for Twitter Has Never Used His Account and Elon Musk Noticed!

This is the hidden content, please

Twitter Board of Directors Own Almost No Shares of Stock in Company, Elon Musk Notes “their economic interests are simply not aligned with shareholders”

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From the article:  "Twitter states that account threatening to murder Libs of Tik Tok is not a violation of company policy.

"Apparently threatening to assassinate someone doesn’t violate Twitter’s policies. But conservatives get suspended for stating biological facts," Libs of Tik Tok wrote.""

Apparently they just don't get it.  They allow the leader of iran and Putin to stay on, but ban Trump.  It's time to show them what free speech is all about!  Come on Elon!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, InMAGAWeTrust said:

RIP Truth Social, another bigly scam in the long list of scams 

 

Hopefully none of you suckers actually put your money where your mouth is and invested in that nonsense. Fool you once, shame on them.. fool ya twice.. well you probably deserve it lol 

By looking at your posts, I'm guessing you are an expert at getting scammed. For some reason the old adage of "take advice from the experts" seems like "disinformation" in this instance.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ironic, free speech in America is being saved by a man from South Africa.  There’s got to be a movie here somewhere.  Glad he may save it but here’s the deal - how come free speech is needing saving?  How sad that it needs saving.  This indicates how bad the democrats have become.  It helped give them the presidential election by hiding the Hunter laptop and stifling conservative voices.  Doesn’t anyone find it strange that Trump is banned but terrorist can post?  That the laptop story published by the NY Post was banned, right before the election?  Twitter was little more than a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.  That’s why dweebs across the country are crying in their box wine over Musk buying it.  Now it may become a site for free speech, and that’s trouble for the Democrats.  So to our liberal friends, breakout your Play-Duh.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Ironic, free speech in America is being saved by a man from South Africa.  There’s got to be a movie here somewhere.  Glad he may save it but here’s the deal - how come free speech is needing saving?  How sad that it needs saving.  This indicates how bad the democrats have become.  It helped give them the presidential election by hiding the Hunter laptop and stifling conservative voices.  Doesn’t anyone find it strange that Trump is banned but terrorist can post?  That the laptop story published by the NY Post was banned, right before the election?  Twitter was little more than a propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.  That’s why dweebs across the country are crying in their box wine over Musk buying it.  Now it may become a site for free speech, and that’s trouble for the Democrats.  So to our liberal friends, breakout your Play-Duh.

Cardinalbacker said it’s all Trump’s fault because he was a Meanie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,954
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    tarige
    Newest Member
    tarige
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Talk from who?  Who was actually there that has knowledge of this that is speaking on it?
    • They're just using Israel as the latest, best excuse to riot.  They are unhappy USA haters (probably hate everything). Look at the woman I mentioned in an earlier post, moves from protest to protest, been arrested over 80 times, and is probably funded by Soros and his ilk and without a doubt is a true blue democrat.
    • I have several dogs (inside/outside), cats (inside/outside), have had a plethora of pets (ponies, quail, rabbits, gerbils, mice, fish, ferrets, the list goes on and on). I am an animal lover; however, I would not base my voting decision on whether or not Noem killed her dog, Obama ate a dog, Biden ate a chocolate chocolate chip ice cream with dog crap on it. None of that resounds with me like National Security & Defense, the Economy, Taxes, Spending, Budget... With that said, Noem should have never brought it up. 
    • totally agree, but there sure is a lot of talk that this dog may not have been one of them.
    • you're doing exactly what you're mad at the media for doing.  you complain about their double standards, but then you're comparing Obama eating dog in a dog-eating country as a small child to Noem shooting a dog as an adult.  I don't like Obama, but give me a break on that comparison.  And let's be clear here, the media didn't sink Noem's career.  She sunk it herself.  Not sure why all of you guys are conveniently ignoring it, but there's a whole lot of talk that her dog wasn't a chicken killer at all, and that she just shot it because it wasn't a good hunting dog and she didn't like it.  If it was eating people's chickens, I have no issue with it, but it's looking more and more like she was trying to get ahead of things and fashion her own narrative before the actual story came out.  for what it's worth, that's the only way her decision to publish this stuff makes any sense at all.  Nobody will ever convince me that she and her handlers thought adding that story was a good idea, and had no ulterior motive to do so.  The reaction to it is the most predictable thing ever, even if the most conservative among us are just totally disgusted that 3/4 of the country disagrees with her actions.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...