Jump to content

Silsbee vs Hardin Jefferson


BADSANTA

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, Jerry West said:

Recently watched Silsbee vs Lufkin with Silsbee winning.  I know Lufkin beat HJ in OT.  Silsbee is though alone but at home they’re almost unstoppable.  I like both teams but think Silsbee by 12.  Miller and Harris are just too much.

Someone from Lufkin said they are missing their best front court big man. So maybe Lufkin was tougher then.  IMO this is the Tigers game of the year thus far.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Who That said:

No way"  Summer Creek  - D. Madison  - H. King - BU twice and Lufkin was much bigger games than HJ..! 🙄😂🐅🏀

I purposely stuck an IMO in what I tweeted, So it is subjective.  It is a bigger game because none of the teams mentioned are 4A teams.  Silsbee plays those teams and they beat all but one, they get some self satisfaction and get to stay 2nd in the polls.  The Tigers probably won't face those teams again this year on the court. It won't be like that in this game because they may  they face them again for bigger stakes in the playoffs. If Silsbee wins the thought is out there 'can I beat em again in the playoffs?'  If they lose to HJ the polls may shift a little.  A lil doubt rises, maybe.  'Can we figure this team out if we play them again in the playoff?'  

Last year these teams played early when a lot of Silsbee's players were still playing football.  If I remember correctly  HJ beat Silsbee by double digits.  This year this game happens as both teams are almost peaking.  This should be a very good game.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

HJ doesn’t have a shot in Silsbee.  It will be good for a half but HJ will not have a shot with that chapter of Refs.  I also believe if they played at HJ, Silsbee would be in trouble with HJ’s chapter.  
 

I would like to see at a neutral sight with neutral refs.  At the Lufkin game Silsbee didn’t commit their for foul for over 13 minutes while Lufkin committed 7.  SE Texas Chapters of refs are not very good these days.  I thank god I’m retired from coaching so I’m not getting judged by these guys ok Tuesday and Friday’s.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Jerry West said:

HJ doesn’t have a shot in Silsbee.  It will be good for a half but HJ will not have a shot with that chapter of Refs.  I also believe if they played at HJ, Silsbee would be in trouble with HJ’s chapter.  
 

I would like to see at a neutral sight with neutral refs.  At the Lufkin game Silsbee didn’t commit their for foul for over 13 minutes while Lufkin committed 7.  SE Texas Chapters of refs are not very good these days.  I thank god I’m retired from coaching so I’m not getting judged by these guys ok Tuesday and Friday’s.

Sounds like excuses to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BADSANTA said:

Sounds like excuses to me. 

I’m just saying they’re bad at both places and feel both teams get a lot of calls at home.  I was at the Silsbee and Lufkin game and saw for my own eyes.  It was obvious that being said I don’t have a dog in the fight, or in this case a Tiger/Hawk.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Jerry West said:

I’m just saying they’re bad at both places and feel both teams get a lot of calls at home.  I was at the Silsbee and Lufkin game and saw for my own eyes.  It was obvious that being said I don’t have a dog in the fight, or in this case a Tiger/Hawk.

So you" have had the pleasure of seeing both these teams this year. So let me ask who do you" have winning this game and by how many.?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


  • Posts

    • The problem as well as that all of the social justice warriors, influencers, and instigators repeat these lies in the immediate days after the event, garnering outrage.  But when they're proven false they never go back and rescind their outrage-causing posts, they just move on to the next one.
    • I just find it really hard to believe that Trump will select a VP based on the votes they bring him.  He's going to want a Trumper that will affirm his every move and stoke his ego.  I'm hoping I'm wrong, but I doubt it.  And as you said, in these battle ground states a few tenths of a % point may be enough to swing the whole election.  Trump can't afford a VP who will cost him votes (Noem would cost him full points, not just tenths), but also needs a candidate that will bring in as many votes as possible.  So hopefully whichever Trump disciple he chooses has some political appeal to swing voters.
    • Good news for this district is for the next two seasons your bi district opposition shouldn’t be much of a challenge… Royal may be better next year but other than that the district is pretty rough… Very good chance that it’s a clean sweep though
    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...