Jump to content

Are You Scared Yet ?


Hagar

Recommended Posts

32 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

I tested positive back in March.  I am A+ btw.  I felt a slight fever.  I could feel stuff moving around near my lungs.  It ached some around my heart.  Basically though I had no symptoms.  I am grateful to still be here just the same. 

Glad you’re ok.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since so many younger folks are asymptomatic, & show no symptoms, & since so many in here haveit/had it, makes me wonder what percentage of the population may have already been infected.   Hopefully, between the infected & the shots, we could, sooner than expected, see a light at the end of this dark tunnel.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Government over-reach seeing how far they can go to take away your liberties.  There was never a need to shut down the country.  There was never a need to shut down small businesses.  There was never a need to mandate wearing a mask.  Funny how all of that played into the hands of the Democratic Party.  However, the majority of the country just rolled over and “accepted” restrictions and infringed liberties.  The government now knows how far they can push and what will be force-fed to the masses.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/26/2020 at 5:49 PM, Hagar said:

Since so many younger folks are asymptomatic, & show no symptoms, & since so many in here haveit/had it, makes me wonder what percentage of the population may have already been infected.   Hopefully, between the infected & the shots, we could, sooner than expected, see a light at the end of this dark tunnel.  

As long as this virus can be used for political gain and be used to keep power in the hands of the turd bags who govern us, there will be no light...at least not that we are permitted to see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry for being redundant, but I seem to be the only one fascinated by Dr. Fauci’s 2017 statement that,  “there is no doubt Donald J. Trump will be confronted with a surprise infectious disease outbreak during his Presidency”.   No maybe, might, perhaps, possibly, just no doubt.   And this miraculous prediction came true almost exactly a year prior to the election (Red Cross blood samples from 12/13/19 taken on the west coast show Covid antibodies).   The booming economy tanks, and Biden wins (that’s another story).  

This is the hidden content, please

All just coincidence?  Jethro Gibbs Rule 39, “No such thing as coincidences”.  😄

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Hagar said:

Sorry for being redundant, but I seem to be the only one fascinated by Dr. Fauci’s 2017 statement that,  “there is no doubt Donald J. Trump will be confronted with a surprise infectious disease outbreak during his Presidency”.   No maybe, might, perhaps, possibly, just no doubt.   And this miraculous prediction came true almost exactly a year prior to the election (Red Cross blood samples from 12/13/19 taken on the west coast show Covid antibodies).   The booming economy tanks, and Biden wins (that’s another story).  

This is the hidden content, please

All just coincidence?  Jethro Gibbs Rule 39, “No such thing as coincidences”.  😄

A planned attack, no doubt.  I can never remember all of his rules, glad somebody can!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Realville said:

And so it begins: early allergic reactions to covid vaccines, interminable lockdowns even with the vaccines being discussed in the UK and a new mutated strain emerging. All this to decrease the mortality rate from 1% to 0.5%. We have never seen a virus politicized like this. 

Another example of man’s selfish mentality that he can control everything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...