Jump to content

Lumberton 62 Little Cypress-Mauriceville 46/FINAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

I feel certain Silsbee will make the playoffs, as the outright winner, or runner up.  Maybe even third.   All that remains to be played out.   What's at stake is who plays the better teams in the other districts first in the playoffs.  I kinda know how playoff seeding works, but I don't have it down pat. .  

District games should be interesting for a change.  Fans in Lumberton, LCM and Bridge City are getting fired up.  Fans in Silsbee stay lit.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

I feel certain Silsbee will make the playoffs, as the outright winner, or runner up.  Maybe even third.   All that remains to be played out.   What's at stake is who plays the better teams in the other districts first in the playoffs.  I kinda know how playoff seeding works, but I don't have it down pat. .  

District games should be interesting for a change.  Fans in Lumberton, LCM and Bridge City are getting fired up.  Fans in Silsbee stay lit.

 

 

That’s the problem, the other district will be bringing HF, HH or HJ in the first round of the playoffs. Better get that first spot and try your luck with Livingston. That makes it all the more interesting this season, it’s a battle for 1st place and the rest go home early. Silsbee vs errbody imo, maybe Ltown has a chance if their stud plays balls out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Boneyard Boys said:

That’s the problem, the other district will be bringing HF, HH or HJ in the first round of the playoffs. Better get that first spot and try your luck with Livingston. That makes it all the more interesting this season, it’s a battle for 1st place and the rest go home early. Silsbee vs errbody imo, maybe Ltown has a chance if their stud plays balls out.

I’m pretty sure that’s frowned upon...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Boneyard Boys said:

That’s the problem, the other district will be bringing HF, HH or HJ in the first round of the playoffs. Better get that first spot and try your luck with Livingston. That makes it all the more interesting this season, it’s a battle for 1st place and the rest go home early. Silsbee vs errbody imo, maybe Ltown has a chance if their stud plays balls out.

Winning in the 1st round of the playoffs is alright. It is much better than not winning the first round that's for sure. A certain 1st round loss comes to mind.  Still,  it gets old. To really make some noise, so to speak, a team needs to upset a known good opponent.   I really want to know: just how good is HH?  Are they good enough to get past Yates and go to state?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

Winning in the 1st round of the playoffs is alright. It is much better than not winning the first round that's for sure. A certain 1st round loss comes to mind.  Still,  it gets old. To really make some noise, so to speak, a team needs to upset a known good opponent.   I really want to know: just how good is HH?  Are they good enough to get past Yates and go to state?

Idk about that but they are undefeated to this point and I think they will win their district. Harvey seems like a pretty good player, the best individual baller in that district and would probably be the best in ours too. Is he a better talent than the Lumberton kid?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Boneyard Boys said:

Idk about that but they are undefeated to this point and I think they will win their district. Harvey seems like a pretty good player, the best individual baller in that district and would probably be the best in ours too. Is he a better talent than the Lumberton kid?

I saw Huffman vs. Yates in Kingwood last season, or was it the season before? Huffman had this player that could shoot from the perimeter lights out. I'm guessing that was Harvey. I think he was a sophomore then, so he should be a Sr. now.  His shooting kept HH in the game in the first half but Yates press and traps wore him down and he didn't shoot as well down the stretch.  Can Yates new players run and play defense like they have in the past?  With no show cases, and tournaments it is harder to tell.  I sat next to some Huffman students.  They were some nice young men.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Kountzer said:

I saw Huffman vs. Yates in Kingwood last season, or was it the season before? Huffman had this player that could shoot from the perimeter lights out.  I think he was a sophmore then, so he should be a Sr. now.  His shooting kept HH in the game in the first half but Yates press and traps wore him down and he didn't shoot as well down the stretch.  Can Yates new players run and play defense like they have in the past?  With no show cases, and tournaments it is harder to tell.

Yea that’s got to be Harvey, Sr now crazy good shooter. I heard Yates is not what they were the past few seasons but idk I’m sure they are still more than a handful for anybody from around here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,945
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Well, the ones who are upset by this are the same ones who can’t define a woman. There was another woman who everybody came down on for hunting. We are a nation of the offended.  
    • For what it’s worth, polling after this came out show her with an 81% disapproval rating.  Only 21% of republicans said she’d be a good choice for veep, and only 28% of self-identified “very conservative” voters said she’s a good option.  Bragging about killing a dog apparently resonates poorly across political affiliations.  
    • They don’t, and they won’t.  May not be an issue in South Dakota, but certainly is on the national stage.  Even my mother in law, who strictly watches OAN and thinks Trump is a great guy who’s never committed a crime in his life is completely disgusted by this.  I know about bad dogs, and don’t have an issue with what she did,  and I’m sure most of us on here agree.  But as is often this case, it’s not going to be our opinions that decide this election.  I thought she might be a valuable running mate that could bring in the female vote, but I’m hoping Trump has the sense to stay away from her now.  
    • I like the approach, here it is, if you don’t like it don’t vote for me, it’s refreshing to see the Ronald Reagan approach. Not every statement needs to be based on a perceived reaction from folks. Don’t think for a minute democrats didn’t have this knowledge, just not the right time to use it, remember Romney and the dog carrier, they knew.  
    • The year after he left DC spell had them boys physical… beat Roschon Johnson and the Indians at home. They were roughing him up all night long. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...