Jump to content

Lindale vs Chapel Hill Friday at 7.


Hagar

Recommended Posts

Lindale, setting new heights for the school playoff run, plays Chapel Hill Friday at 7pm.  They’ve played once already, Lindale winning 52-6, but Chapel Hill has improved.   

Playoff scores:

Lindale 11-2 defeated 

Vidor 29-13

Needville 70-56

Chapel Hill 8-4 defeated 

Livingston 49-37

Stafford 40-14

Probably another high scoring game.  I’m taking Lindale and over 75 again.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, LTFALCON said:

Kilgore gets past Huffman? 

Not if my support for the Falcons is significant.   I’d love to see Huffman win, but if I’m betting, I’ll have to go with Kilgore, as if there had been money on the line two weeks ago, I’d put my money on Lindale to beat Vidor.   To put in Readers Digest terms, my hearts with Huffman, but my money is on Kilgore.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, lostaussie said:

Chapel Hill has improved tremendously and has several back that did not play against Lindale the 1st time around.  That said......Lindale still gonna be to much I believe.  

Agree 100%.   Lindale is averaging 43 points per game.   You have to put up big numbers to beat them.   😜

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/23/2020 at 1:28 PM, Hagar said:

Lindale, setting new heights for the school playoff run, plays Chapel Hill Friday at 7pm.  They’ve played once already, Lindale winning 52-6, but Chapel Hill has improved.   

Playoff scores:

Lindale 11-2 defeated 

Vidor 29-13

Needville 70-56

Chapel Hill 8-4 defeated 

Livingston 49-37

Stafford 40-14

Probably another high scoring game.  I’m taking Lindale and over 75 again.

 

 

I took Lindale in the pickems because of you 😂 

 

More than likely I'll tune into this game. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Hagar said:

Agree 100%.   Lindale is averaging 43 points per game.   You have to put up big numbers to beat them.   😜

You got to pound on that running back too. Jenkins is a beast. I thought they were gonna score a hundred on us when we played, but we slowed him down in the 2nd half and our offense came alive with a 35 point 3rd quarter.  They made a few mistakes and we capitalized big time. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, lostaussie said:

You got to pound on that running back too. Jenkins is a beast. I thought they were gonna score a hundred on us when we played, but we slowed him down in the 2nd half and our offense came alive with a 35 point 3rd quarter.  They made a few mistakes and we capitalized big time. 

Evidently Jenkins has a great future.  Vidor holding them to 29 points took a big effort by the defense & offense.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,945
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • If there's a specific situation that started this thread, I don't know the details.  Nor do I care.  But I do have an opinion about what I'm gathering from some of the comments. My opinion: I do believe that an AD should leave the players of a particular sport to their respective head coach during that season.  The varsity players of that sport anyway.  I believe it's a little different concerning the sub varsity players of that sport.  If an AD/HFC decides to grab some JV baseball players for some offseason football stuff during the athletics period, I don't have AS MUCH of a problem with it.  I would still consider it a common courtesy to discuss with the head coach of that particular sport to consider their thoughts on it. I also believe that ALL athletes should be lifting and running all year.  When in a particular season, I believe that the head coach of that sport should control the reigns on that topic to implement some sport specific lifting/running during their season.  But all athletes should be in the weight room year round. As far as playing multiple sports?  I'm an advocate.  I know that the popular idea is for potentially good/great players in a specific sport to "focus" on that sport.  And I agree.. but focusing on one sport doesn't mean stopping the others.  It just means prioritizing time in a way that extra work is put into that specific sport.  After hours, weekends, holidays/summer, etc..  Just because you plan on making a push into college baseball (for example) doesn't mean you can't work on baseball during other sports seasons.  That's exactly what I did.. and countless others.  Plus, it's important to maybe learn how to be a role player in a sport that you're not the best at.  Because that's coming. That's my opinion.  And I come from an era where kids played multiple sports if they knew it would be helping.  Helping their classmates.. or just contributing to school pride.  I hate knowing that there are schools that could be much more competitive if their kids would just come out.  It's hard for me to understand if I'm being honest. 
    • I wasn't arguing the point of how an AD keeps his job. The question was "what has happened to Jasper" as in their whole athletic department. They were much much better in those other sports even when football was successful. Not anymore. Something definitely has changed.
    • I just don't think it's as big an issue as what's being discussed. My opinion.
    • It's common knowledge that this sort of thing happens on ranches, out in the country, etc.  I'd be willing to bet that a good number of people who participate in this forum have had to do something similar. That said, she's an absolute moron for putting it in a book, period.  The act of killing the dog can be justified, especially for those of us familiar with how life on a ranch/farm works,  but publicizing it is inexcusable for someone in her position.  I honestly have no clue what she was thinking.  60% percent of the country already doesn't like trump, and now his most likely running mate has a major controversy over killing a dog.  Pure stupidity.
    • There are times when certain things are appropriate, and when they are not.  We can agree to disagree on the appropriateness of star baseball players doing contact football drills in the days leading up the baseball playoffs.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...