Jump to content

Lumberton Raiders


RaiderGirl2010

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, L-Train11 said:

I know what you meant. And I was thinking the same thing. The record could have easily been better but it is what it is, but these boys do a lot off of the field that sometimes goes unnoticed.

I by all means wasn’t taking anything away from them. Those kids did a lot for their community and others!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, livefor2day said:

Will Lumberton win their new district next year if it is the one projected?  They were in a tough district but are they going to have everyone back?

I think for the first time in 10 years we will be one of the top 3 favorites to win district going into the season. We definitely have a shot. As far as who is coming back, we bring about 8-9 back on defense, returning qb, I think a couple receivers, and a few o-line.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, L-Train11 said:

I believe Silsbee and Jasper are on there, maybe HF again.. but I was told that by coach Babin before we were for sure going down to 4A. It probably won’t change we’ll just need to add another game maybe

Yes to Silsbee and Jasper. The new Beaumont school was a week 2 possibility but likely won't happen. Will need to add 2 to 3 games depending on how tomorrow goes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,945
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Well, the ones who are upset by this are the same ones who can’t define a woman. There was another woman who everybody came down on for hunting. We are a nation of the offended.  
    • For what it’s worth, polling after this came out show her with an 81% disapproval rating.  Only 21% of republicans said she’d be a good choice for veep, and only 28% of self-identified “very conservative” voters said she’s a good option.  Bragging about killing a dog apparently resonates poorly across political affiliations.  
    • They don’t, and they won’t.  May not be an issue in South Dakota, but certainly is on the national stage.  Even my mother in law, who strictly watches OAN and thinks Trump is a great guy who’s never committed a crime in his life is completely disgusted by this.  I know about bad dogs, and don’t have an issue with what she did,  and I’m sure most of us on here agree.  But as is often this case, it’s not going to be our opinions that decide this election.  I thought she might be a valuable running mate that could bring in the female vote, but I’m hoping Trump has the sense to stay away from her now.  
    • I like the approach, here it is, if you don’t like it don’t vote for me, it’s refreshing to see the Ronald Reagan approach. Not every statement needs to be based on a perceived reaction from folks. Don’t think for a minute democrats didn’t have this knowledge, just not the right time to use it, remember Romney and the dog carrier, they knew.  
    • The year after he left DC spell had them boys physical… beat Roschon Johnson and the Indians at home. They were roughing him up all night long. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...