Jump to content

SETXsports PLAYOFF CENTRAL


WOSgrad

Recommended Posts

This is the hidden content, please

PLAYOFF CENTRAL

12-6A

DI: Conroe Oak Ridge (12-6A) at Mesquite Horn (11-6A)

     Rockwall (11-6A) at The Woodlands (12-6A)

DII: Beaumont West Brook (12-6A) at Longview (11-6A)

      Rockwall-Heath (11-6A) at Lufkin (12-6A)

 

21-6A

DI: Pasadena Memorial (22-6A) at Atascocita (21-6A)

     Galena Park North Shore (21-6A) at Deer Park (22-6A)

DII: La Porte (22-6A) at Humble Summer Creek (21-6A)

     Kingwood (21-6A) vs. South Houston (22-6A)

 

21-5A

DI: Nederland (22-5A) vs. Porter (21-5A)

     Kingwood Park (21-5A) vs. Port Arthur Memorial (22-5A)

DII: Vidor (22-5A) vs. New Caney (21-5A)

     Crosby (21-5A) vs. Port Neches-Groves (22-5A)

 

22-5A

DI: Nederland (22-5A) vs. Porter (21-5A)

     Kingwood Park (21-5A) vs. Port Arthur Memorial (22-5A)

DII: Vidor (22-5A) vs. New Caney (21-5A)

     Crosby (21-5A) vs. Port Neches-Groves (22-5A)

 

10-4A-I

Center (9-4A-I) vs. Silsbee (10-4A-I)

Henderson (9-4A-I) vs. Navasota (10-4A-I)

Kilgore (9-4A-I) vs. Little Cypress-Mauriceville (10-4A-I)

Carthage (9-4A-I) vs. Huffman Hargrave (10-4A-I)

 

8-4A-II

Atlanta (7-4A-II) vs. Jasper (8-4A-II)

Pittsburg (7-4A-II) vs. Rusk (8-4A-II)

Gilmer (7-4A-II) vs. Diboll (8-4A-II)

Texarkana Pleasant Grove (7-4A-II) vs.Tatum (8-4A-II)

 

11-4A-II

Hardin-Jefferson (12-4A-II) vs Madisonville (11-4A-II)

Orangefield (12-4A-II) vs Bellville (11-4A-II)

Liberty (12-4A-II) vs Shepherd (11-4A-II)

West Orange-Stark (12-4A-II) at Brookshire Royal (11-4A-II)

 

12-4A-II

Hardin-Jefferson (12-4A-II) vs Madisonville (11-4A-II)

Orangefield (12-4A-II) vs Bellville (11-4A-II)

Liberty (12-4A-II) vs Shepherd (11-4A-II)

West Orange-Stark (12-4A-II) at Brookshire Royal (11-4A-II)

 

11-3A-I

Hempstead (12-3A-I) vs. Woodville (11-3A-I)

La Marque (12-3A-I) vs. Coldspring-Oakhurst (11-3A-I)

East Chambers (12-3A-I) vs. Buna (11-3A-I)

Hitchcock (12-3A-I) vs. Trinity (11-3A-I)

 

12-3A-I

Current Standings:

Hempstead (12-3A-I) vs. Woodville (11-3A-I)

La Marque (12-3A-I) vs. Coldspring-Oakhurst (11-3A-I)

East Chambers (12-3A-I) vs. Buna (11-3A-I)

Hitchcock (12-3A-I) vs. Trinity (11-3A-I)

 

10-3A-II

Arp (9-3A-II) vs. Newton (10-3A-II)

Elysian Fields (9-3A-II) vs. Garrison (10-3A-II)

Waskom (9-3A-II) vs. Hemphill (10-3A-II)

West Rusk (9-3A-II) vs.Corrigan-Camden (10-3A-II)

 

11-2A-I

Deweyville (12-2A-I) vs. San Augustine (11-2A-I)

Centerville (12-2A-I) vs. Joaquin (11-2A-I)

Groveton (12-2A-I) vs. Alto (11-2A-I)

Lovelady (12-2A-I) vs. Price Carlisle (11-2A-I)

 

12-2A-I

Deweyville (12-2A-I) vs. San Augustine (11-2A-I)

Centerville (12-2A-I) vs. Joaquin (11-2A-I)

Groveton (12-2A-I) vs. Alto (11-2A-I)

Lovelady (12-2A-I) vs. Price Carlisle (11-2A-I)

 

12-2A-II

Mt. Enterprise (11-2A-II) vs. Iola (12-2A-II)

Grapeland (11-2A-II)vs. Evadale (12-2A-II)

Timpson (11-2A-II) vs. Hull-Daisetta (12-2A-II)

Tenaha (11-2A-II) vs. Colmesneil (12-2A-II)

 

16-1A-I

Fannindel (15-1A-I) vs. Gilmer Union Hill (16-1A-I)

Tioga (15-1A-I) vs. High Island (16-1A-I)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

even with the updated results, nederland would play New Caney and PAM would face Porter. Nederland have two district losses and PAM own the head to head. in other words, PAM would go in as the "1st place D1" representative and Nederland would be runner up. that means PAM would get the D1 runner up, Porter and Nederland get the "1st place D1" rep in 21-5A.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, pakronos said:

even with the updated results, nederland would play New Caney and PAM would face Porter. Nederland have two district losses and PAM own the head to head. in other words, PAM would go in as the "1st place D1" representative and Nederland would be runner up. that means PAM would get the D1 runner up, Porter and Nederland get the "1st place D1" rep in 21-5A.

New Caney lost last night

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Crosby has clinched the DII 1 seed. If New Caney beats Porter and then beats Crosby along with Kingwood Park winning out and making the playoffs, then New Caney would be DII 1 seed due to the tie breaker of the win over Crosby and KP pushing them to DII. Unlikely but possible, correct?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, vp93 said:

I don't think Crosby has clinched the DII 1 seed. If New Caney beats Porter and then beats Crosby along with Kingwood Park winning out and making the playoffs, then New Caney would be DII 1 seed due to the tie breaker of the win over Crosby and KP pushing them to DII. Unlikely but possible, correct?

You would be correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, pakronos said:

So if central wins out, they have no shot?? Say Vidor lose to PAM and Nederland lose to the cheating injuns...I mean png..does central make it?

No, Central is still in, as long as they win out. 

They are just not in a position to lock that spot up this week.  Vidor and Nederland are in a position to do that, although Nederland's chances of doing that rely on a Central loss this week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Loyal Ranger said:

For sterling to clinch they need to beat kingwood. Ce King needs to lose to Atascocita and Summer Creek needs to beat Channelview. If all that happens Friday night the Rangers will be in the playoffs for the first time since 2008. 

Yes, I guess I broke my own rule there.  

If Sterling, C.E. King and Channelview all win.  That would leave Sterling at 3-3, and Kingwood, Channelview and Kingwood at 2-4. 

In Week 11, if Sterling were to lose to Channelview and King were to beat Kingwood.  That would leave Sterling, Channelview and King all at 3-4 and 1-1 head to head against each other.

Tie breaker as it currently stands amongst those 3 is Sterling +13 (13 pt win over King with the game against Channelview pending), King +8 (13 pt loss to Sterling, 21 pt win over Channelview) and Channelview - 21 (21 pt loss to King with game with Sterling pending).  So if Sterling would lose by more than 5 points to Channelview, the 4th and final spot would be King's.

So the upshot of all of this is that you are correct.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WOSgrad said:

Yes, I guess I broke my own rule there.  

If Sterling, C.E. King and Channelview all win.  That would leave Sterling at 3-3, and Kingwood, Channelview and Kingwood at 2-4. 

In Week 11, if Sterling were to lose to Channelview and King were to beat Kingwood.  That would leave Sterling, Channelview and King all at 3-4 and 1-1 head to head against each other.

Tie breaker as it currently stands amongst those 3 is Sterling +13 (13 pt win over King with the game against Channelview pending), King +8 (13 pt loss to Sterling, 21 pt win over Channelview) and Channelview - 21 (21 pt loss to King with game with Sterling pending).  So if Sterling would lose by more than 5 points to Channelview, the 4th and final spot would be King's.

So the upshot of all of this is that you are correct.

It’s all good thanks for the detailed breakdown of all these district keep up the good work

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, pakronos said:

So if central wins out, they have no shot?? Say Vidor lose to PAM and Nederland lose to the cheating injuns...I mean png..does central make it?

If Vidor and Nederland go 1-1 in the remaining games, along with Central winning out. They all will be 5-3 with the pts tie breaker that would leave Central out, Vidor +14, Ned +3, Central -17. So, in your scenario they would be on the outside of the playoffs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21-6A Seedings already decided: Atascocita (DI#1); Humble Summer Creek (DII#1); Galena Park North Shore  (DI#2)

Games affecting undecided seeds: Kingwood at Sheldon C.E. King

Scenarios and Results:

Kingwood win = Atascocita (DI#1); Humble Summer Creek (DII#1); Galena Park North Shore  (DI#2); Kingwood (DII#2)

C.E. King win = Atascocita (DI#1); Humble Summer Creek (DII#1); Galena Park North Shore  (DI#2); C.E. King (DII#2)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • I voted for energy independence, secure border, selection of conservative SCJ, lowest unemployment in decades, I could go on but there's no emotion here, I vote for policies. Look at what we have now, there's no comparison. I just listed the reasons I voted for Trump, someone PLEASE list the reasons you would vote for Biden. @Boyz N Da Hood you said we should vote on policies, I just listed them for Trump, tell me which ones you don't like and wouldn't vote for him because of them.  
    • Hold them accountable? Like here in Texas where we have, by any definition, the most conservative Speaker that we’ve ever had. He pushed through an abortion ban and border security measures, reduced school taxes, etc… and the people who put him in office are firing him for not being MAGA enough.    Every third commercial on TV is Trump (or somebody who supports Trump) calling Phelan a RINO and supporting an impotent replacement for the most powerful person in the House.    It’s 100% MAGA, and it’s 12000% stupid.    “oh, he didn’t do those things by himself” says everyone who doesn’t understand parliamentary procedure. 
    • @bullets13 not sure why it double posted the topic.. delete this one plz sir
    • Me personally I respect posters like @bullets13 @CardinalBacker they vote for a guy and can call out others in the party or the direction a party can be headed.... others on here fall "lockstep" with whatever happens and defend by all means is the mantra it seems... no need to call out names, it's probably you if your mad at this statement 🤣 
    • I recall prior to midterms the R's and the "red wave" would get America "back on track" etc.... they would end this and stop Biden from that blah blah blah, so what's the problem? It looks like a circus show from both sides and whoever can sit or stand with a straight face and defend it is a 🤡! Desantis would've been a slam dunk for the R's and he possibly would've got my vote... now they pick a guy who lost the popular vote twice lol (yeah I know that means nothing in grand scheme of things).. point being is the dude is highly unlikeable (I also know this doesn't matter) 👈🏾 just getting ahead of the deflectors... personally I hope the clown gets in there so ppl can see how ultra right the clown is trying to push America for... IF he wins in November you can bet he will be on a rampage for 4 years getting lil if anything done, will most likely spend his term for the same thing some of yall complain about daily, going after his opponents... but hey the D's do it right? So yeah it's cool if we do it SMH We're supposed to vote on policies etc while at the same time the person you vote for that made promises to change or fix this and that complains about his predecessor being the issue! It's all a joke What have R's done that's good for America since midterms?  What have D's done? And please leave your feelings out of this and be truthful if possible!
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...