Jump to content

Who can beat Vidor?


Stattrax

Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Stattrax said:

Please let us know some facts and if VIdor has become the new Katy of Suutheast Texas.... 14.2......... Please throw some stats out for us!!!

Vidor is 77-95 under Mathews the 17 years before the season started. In those 17 years he does have one career bi-district win against Crosby. Of all the coaches I looked at in this classification he has the lowest win percentage of any to coach 100 or more games at said school. Long way from Gary Joseph, or for that matter Fairclothe. Hard to really find stats on a program that's not recognized.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cougar14.2 said:

Vidor is 77-95 under Mathews the 17 years before the season started. In those 17 years he does have one career bi-district win against Crosby. Of all the coaches I looked at in this classification he has the lowest win percentage of any to coach 100 or more games at said school. Long way from Gary Joseph, or for that matter Fairclothe. Hard to really find stats on a program that's not recognized.  

Your so Awesome Waterboy.... I mean 14.2!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

On a serious note I do believe PAM will at least struggle with that offense some what,I doubt if they have played a team that runs anything like it..

I never thought of it like that... Memorial was not founded when that offense was popular.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Stattrax said:

Buddy Garrity is on a break.. I have to take up the slack... I tried to fill the front page with Vidor post but the mods caught me and combined them....LOL...

Is it a permanent break? You mean we can now have conversations here without the same poster responding every 5 seconds in every thread? This is starting to sound like a more pleasant place to visit.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Yep, back to putting the responsibility of a vote on the actual voter. You call Trump a turd sandwich and I say he was a good President. Once again, your cakewalk theory is bogus, no such thing for a Republican President no matter how many time you claim it. Bottom line, we got two choices, it's a given, folks need to deal with it. The woulda, coulda, shoulda ship has sailed.
    • That's true to an extent. I think (my opinion) the upheaval within the party over Trump, an outsider, being elected and the "Never Trumpers" may have had something to do with that. The Republican party is so bass ackwards right now, it's ridiculous. I think they have a better shot though.
    • I definitely remember. One of my favorite movies.
    • His assistant, Flowers. Former coach at Broaddus I believe. Young guy
    • back to the old "the voters are stupid if they don't decide our turd sandwich is better than their turd sandwich" argument.  first and foremost it's the party's responsibility to put out electable candidates (both failed).  Then the party line voters are responsible for picking an electable option in the primaries for the general election (both failed again).  And finally, once you get to the general election, it's the entire country's responsibility to pick the best option for the job.  85-90% of the country's vote is decided before a candidate is ever named (and everyone commenting in this thread falls in this category).  And to be completely honest, the left has done a better job of pandering to those 10-15% who actually decide the presidency, they're just screwed here because they have the sitting president and he wants to run again.  Lucky for them the right are throwing the same guy at him that lost the last time, and nobody likes him any more than they did 4 years ago.  If we'd picked literally ANYBODY besides Trump in the primary it would be a cakewalk.  As it is, it'll be a tight race likely coming down to tenths of percentages in a handful of states to decide things.  But hey, instead of doing what's necessary to win elections, let's just insist on doing the same thing that didn't work before, demanding the other side completely adjust their politics without any concessions, and then blame them for being stupid when they don't agree to our terms and just vote in their own not very good candidate.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...