thetragichippy

About Time [Hidden Content]

No one believes you posted the question you did and expected a different answer than what you got. Fact of the matter is we don't and won't know exactly what happened on 1-6.......at least not for a long time. We could have learned a lot if the Select Committee would of done an investigation instead of a made for TV drama.

Well, if I recall he started saying "I can't breath" in the back of the patrol car. I'm not saying he was a perfect cop, or he could of done something different, what I'm saying is had Floyd complied he might of lived another day,,,,,and Chauvin did not deserve to go to jail.

Do you think a 90 year old woman would need to be restrained like that? How was the officer to know he had health issues.

No matter the race, people should be responsible for their actions.....Would I have died if treated that way? NO.....would any healthy person....NO The root cause of this incident was not following lawful orders. PERIOD. This was a political conviction.....

BAck up your statement, because the report I quoted was taken about 1 hour after death....a reminder Toxicology (see attached report for full details; testing performed on antemortem blood specimens collected 5/25/20 at 9:00 p.m. at HHC and on postmortem urine) A. Blood drug and novel psychoactive substances screens: Those figures are not trace amounts.....

Trace amounts? As a "nurse" please explain how 7 ng/ml or greater is associated with fatalities and Georgie had 11 ng/ml and that is "trace amounts"? Take that level and add it to the other drugs in his system,........ The estimated lethal dose of fentanyl in humans is 2 mg. Blood concentrations of approximately 7 ng/ml or greater have been associated with fatalities where poly-substance use was involved. VI. Toxicology (see attached report for full details; testing performed on antemortem blood specimens collected 5/25/20 at 9:00 p.m. at HHC and on postmortem urine) A. Blood drug and novel psychoactive substances screens: 1. Fentanyl 11 ng/mL 2. Norfentanyl 5.6 ng/mL 3. 4-ANPP 0.65 ng/mL 4. Methamphetamine 19 ng/mL 5. 11-Hydroxy Delta-9 THC 1.2 ng/mL; Delta-9 Carboxy THC 42 ng/mL; Delta-9 THC 2.9 ng/mL 6. Cotinine positive 7. Caffeine positive B. Blood volatiles: negative for ethanol, methanol, isopropanol, or acetone C. Urine drug screen: presumptive positive for cannabinoids, amphetamines, and fentanyl/metabolite D. Urine drug screen confirmation: morphine (free) 86 ng/mL

This backs up my Fathers statement that I heard MANY MANY times when he taught me about guns - "Don't ever point a gun at someone unless you plan on shooting them" - That dude may have not intended on shooting him, could of been just to intimidate him......the Son had no way of knowing......

The guy was resisting and kicking - is getting him to the ground the preferred method? I mean, if he was worried about the concrete floor he should of stayed compliant. .....IMO

That really explains why the kid is how he is..... I taught my Son to defend himself, but if he started a fight, he would have rather went to jail than face me when he got home.

Depends on what you define as terrorism. I don't think either is a threat to America. Just like "threat to democracy" is just a democratic talking point.

I would absolutely ask for immunity if I was close to Trump and they wanted to question me....wouldn't you? I don't believe anything the media reports as sources. The media has become more click bait that facts, and typically it's a reporters opinion that your reading. Trump thought the election was stolen and was trying any way possible to get it reversed legally....which is why he had a team of lawyers. They are trying to twist this into something it's not.....because they are scared to death of Trump.........and that should scare you, because despite the attacks he had a great 4 years.....why are they so scared?

I guess UT does not any answers to this

NDN press not working great

Question, where besides political left wing hacks has it been confirmed Meadows "flipped"? Specifically what evidence does meadow's have that Jack does not? I mean, the left wing judges allowed a pretty broad search warrant to search and collect evidence in Trumps home, and those same judges stepped all over attorney/client privilege,,,,, Again, what does meadow's have that would be trumps demise? and BTW, Agreeing to cooperate in a trial is not flippin.....

What opinion did he state that you didn't like?

In a world where the left calls anything the right thinks as conspiracy, looks like we are doing the same to donthecons suggestion. For me, I'm taking a wait and see approach and asking lots of questions There are a lot of things we don't know......

You think Israel would let this happen knowingly? I do think we need to get to the bottom of how this slipped by.

Think we can interact without the name calling?

Why wouldn't it. With this slim of a majority you need some compromise, and those 8 are not having it.

Why? We have a 9 member majority and 8 of them voted McCarthy out. That means the next speaker would be a slave to those 8 members and have to do exactly what they wanted.

Not gonna lie......this was a stupid move on the Republicans part.

I honestly don't get it. We always seem to do this...... There should be no Republican who thinks this was a win.....Any speaker will be limited on what he can get done with such a small majority.

1. They refuse 2. They refuse 3. They refuse -that is my issue with solutions, there are not many.....and to force someone to do what they don't want to do is slippery slope. .... Real Life Example: My father lived to 1 month before his 90th birthday, Always a VERY independent self made man. At around 85-86 he had no business driving or frankly living alone. We thought for his safety (and others) his license should be revoked and for his well-being he should be in a nursing home. We found out, and I'm glad, it's tough to take away freedoms in this country.....My father was competent enough to say no to both of those issues. As a result, My Father lived the remainder of his life on his terms.......and I hope to do the same. So, what if they say no? Do we have to strip down the constitution?

Where do you put them? People will always feed them. You can't put them in prison......and even if you could, we don't have the space