thetragichippy

It's about the revenue.......CNN makes money off trump. 30% of my post was about Trump, the other 70% was about Biden and a third party candidate.....your response only focused on Trump......why?

Trump is leading by A LOT and will get the Republican nomination unless he actually does shoot someone on 5th avenue. The Democrats are turning on Biden as most polls they believe he can't do the job.....add his pending legal troubles, along with the Hunter mess, I would not call it a sure thing to beat Trump......The other issue with Biden is the debates, more than likely he won't debate......and ulike Trump not "needing to debate cause of his numbers", Biden will give the appearance he is not fit enough to debate........ Add the possibility of a 3rd party candidate.....If that happens, that only benefits Trump..... So, I would not go as far s saying Trump can't win......if Trump was not a threat, you wouldn't be talking about him so much......

I can't believe they didn't find a scapegoat. While I doubt it was Hunter, this is a horrible PR move for the White House......unless they trying to put pressure on Biden not to run.

That is like the red flag of red flags.......lol

It's pretty simple - If we get Biden for another 4 years we will survive. I don't see how house or senate could swing that would give the Dem's a super majority to do any real damage. Like or hate Trump, the Democratic process is working. It appears and not by a little, he has the majority of the Republican party's support. The question you should be asking is why....... If Trump gets the nomination and you vote for anyone else (for whatever reason) you vote for Biden....or, even worse, Kamala........ While Trump has his issues, and there are several I don't like, there is no question in my mind that he will do better for the Country, and equally or more importantly, I feel he will do more for ME and my family........ and while I don't feel VP's have too much effect on elections, his pick will be important......imagine a Trump/JFK ticket..........(I don't think that will happen...but)

He did, but it's hard to tell if videos have been altered.

The Civil Rights act was passed in 1964.....I was born in 1965 and I feel I'm older than you.....so you didn't grow up before the civil rights act either......so we are BOTH making our opinions based on research.......You being black does not give you some knowledge about it I don't have.

The same place anyone else does...... It's not hard to get drugs, just look at all the bust they do locally - and think of the ones that don't get caught

I'm not happy about that. I initially bought the "family" plan so my kids could use it....My kids are in college and live away and now they changed it.....have not stopped me yet tho

I've never understood how it makes it harder. How does one function in America without an ID? Also, what percent that does not have the motivation/time/money to get an ID would actually spend the time to vote? The bigger issue is lowering standards to make it easy for anyone to do anything. Laws get broken, lets change them.....Bails too high, lets lower it....STARR test is too hard.....lets end it...... We are letting a very small percent of people change who we are as a nation......it's going to end up biting us......

If you think I accept everyone else, you have not been reading all my comments

I agree with you on that.

I've never seen someone so quick to try and stir the pot to cause controversy.

It is not necessary to pick a side. I'm not gay so I have no idea why people are, so who am I to speak out against something I don't understand? Over the years I have hired and became very good friends with gay men and women. None of them were mentally ill. ALL OF THEM added value to the business. I think the problem is trying to force people to believe in something they either don't understand or don't agree with. Calling them "homophobic" is not going to change their minds, and will only make them pick a side......which is counter productive. A business that sells to the public is making a horrible decision getting in the middle of cancel culture politics........ How about we live and let live.......

The mods get to address that, not you. I've raised it to the mods

This conversation is getting out of hand. If you can't refrain from name calling and personal attacks, don't post

No, warned and message deleted

Are you speaking of folks on this forum?

When did Trump get convicted of rape?

Better polling data IMO [Hidden Content]

I think the basis of our disagreement is the understanding of our justice system. Before Trump, guilt had to be proved, not innocence........ Would you provide the "law" you keep mentioning concerning the proper way to declassify documents. If it is a law, it should also have punishments listed as well.

It's I've

The American bar Association disagrees with you...... Most national security legal experts dismissed the former president’s suggestion that he could declassify documents simply by thinking about it. But as an ABA Legal Fact Check posted Oct. 17 explains, legal guidelines support his contention that presidents have broad authority to formally declassify most documents that are not statutorily protected, while they are in office. As the new ABA Legal Fact Check notes, the extent of a president’s legal authority to unilaterally declassify materials — without following formal procedures — has yet to be challenged in court. I am smart enough to research what I talk about [Hidden Content] the U.S. Constitution%2C the,through use of executive orders.

This has yet to be proven. The procedures are not laws, so if not followed how are they crimes? If the constitution gives the President the single power to declassify anything with no instructions, why can't he declassify just by taking them home? Trump will take this all the way to the Supreme Court.......The Supreme Court rules on constitutionality.......

As usual a very productive comment to the benefit of the page Does the personal jabs make up for something missing in your life?