thetragichippy

Real talk: If the Epstein hysteria was to evaporate tomorrow never to be heard about again, by far the biggest losses will be the revenue now being realized by all the online influencers who are relying on it for income.

Instead of wearing T-shirts, just say the names

Over 3 million released…..again, victims could clear this all up

See, that’s the problem. You can’t name 5….evidence is an inconvenience when you want something to be true.

You seem to be in the know….

10 names, heck, I’ll take 5…

@DCT - Give 10 names…..

So could the victims….. BUT, most took settlements for their silence….cold hard truth. I’m all for getting pedo’s but you need evidence and these “victims” may not be good witnesses.

Listening and understanding is almost as important as common sense…… They could release the names……

Dude, no it does not, it actually reenforces it….why do the victims need ANYONE to release the names? So because the DOJ won’t meet with them they can’t release the names😂😂. Please….. ANY news outlet will welcome with open arms the victims if they released the names.

Interesting how law and proof work….

Or a Judge who will be one sided and go against norms to get a conviction….as in Trumps case

First you didn’t address my point, you went straight to emotion. Second, if it was truly about the children, accusers, “victims” could have came out 10 years ago, or at least during the Biden administration…. I’m sure the Biden administration would of had no problem letting them wear their t-shirts. Here is your second change to address my point about the victims in danger no matter how the names come out….

You make a good point. @DCT seems to think the reason the “victims” won’t release the names themselves is out of fear for their life. If the DOJ releases the “list”, and they have enough evidence to prosecute, the “victims” will be 1st hand witnesses…..that would put them in the SAME danger as releasing the names themselves…. actually Matt, you just helped me prove my point, this is political….unless someone can explain why DOJ releasing the list would be safer for victims than them releasing the names.

Lol….so whoever may “kill them” is perfectly fine if they campaign with T-Shirts that say release the names, but they cross the line if THEY release the names😂 That does not pass the smell test for me….also some of the “victims” were adults at the time of their assault.

Really? All we know is what is being released. They(congress) are trying to interpret redacted emails, accusations from anonymous sources, etc…… a single do or don’t can change the meaning of a redacted document 100%. Allegations have plagued Trumps terms by Democrats….Russigate….

What if she was using it to collect evidence on Congress people that may be involved with the Epstein case? Would you be for or against that?

All the folks that are invested, is this true? Elizabeth Stein She works for Tides Foundation (soros open society funded) funded World Without Exploitation They produced the superbowl commercial of "victims" this past weekend She was a FULL GROWN ASS WOMAN when she met Maxwell at her job at 21 years old She formed a 3 year *friendship* with Epstein and Maxwell........apparently sexual She didn't realize she was trafficked until 30 years later when Epstein was sentenced. She attempted but failed to recover funds from the Victims fund Maxwell's attorney pointed out she did not legally qualify as a “crime victim” under the CVRA and she received no payout. But she sure did try.

If it was not an effort to get Trump, why all of a sudden did this turn into another “me too” fiasco?

Deflection - it is a murder that they are trying to turn political He is just pointing out crazy people - murders happen along all demographics..... [Hidden Content] here is one just as dumb

This will backfire - ICE is funded through 2029 - not a thing Democrats can do! Shutting down DHS will inconvenience travelers and business travel...along with FEMA....and March starts Tornado season.....

Apparently some women have the brains to complete all the paperwork to get married, but if they get a divorce they become stupid, and can’t figure out have to change their name back so they can vote……at least that is what several democrats claim

There has been examples of election fraud the last several years, but Democrats discount it as not significant….at the same time claiming every vote should count…. Banks eat fraud all the time…….and ask for id…..think about that in the votes…..what get ls missed?

I work at a bank, possibly protecting YOUR money if you use a bank. To open an account we require two forms of ID, which 1st form is typically a DL or State ID. How would you like of the bank gave away your money because someone stole your wallet, grabbed your Social security card, came to the bank pretending to be you and the bank gave him 10 grand out of your account? I bet you and every other Dem would support photo ID when it comes to taking money from your account. Nothing is fraud proof, including photo id, but it helps.....just like the wall helps but people, with time, can figure out a way around it. The newest fraud is stealing bank statements and ordering a fake DL with your info and their picture....then walking into a bank you bank out in a different town, they claim to be traveling and get a couple thousand to stay under radar.....They can do that at a few different banks before they are caught. It is difficult to claim someone is not who they claim to be,,,,,,because if you are wrong, it's a bad look..... This will pass the senate