-
Posts
3,193 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
36
Everything posted by OlDawg
-
I think you’re aware of my personal views. Pretty sure they’re well known by now. 😂
-
I’m also hoping Wexner realizes—at 88–he’s running short on time, and decides to open up this Wednesday about a lot of things. He could shed light on so many things since back in the 80’s up to now. I’d like to know if—and how much if so—he assisted in Israel being the middleman to Iran for Iran-Contra. Was Epstein involved in any way at that time? When he/Epstein bought Southern Air Transport, did they buy any other old CIA assets, or was the entire apparatus already disassembled? Tell us definitive information about Robert Maxwell (Ghislaine Maxwell’s father and suspected intelligence asset of foreign services). Was Epstein assisting any foreign intelligence services at any time that they were business partners/friends? When Epstein was recommended to you by ‘others’, who were these ‘others’, and were you aware of his legal issues while at Bear Stearns? If so, why did you trust him with your business empire and give him Power of Attorney? Epstein and Maxwell were deep in the game. I’d like to know how deep. We all should. It might help us to know if anyone is still compromised. I know the girls are important. But, he could also help us in so many other ways. With any luck, he’ll want to clear his tab before checking out.
-
Hopefully not. Partial gridlock (POTUS one Party & Congress the other) is typically good for the Market and the economy as a whole. Business can plan. No wild swings one way or the other on policy. Settles people down on divisive social issues. Sort of a ‘cool down’ timeout. Impeachment is historically very bad for the economy. Why would anyone want the people to suffer when POTUS couldn’t run again anyway? That would be the epitome of stupid.
-
State Representation, among funding for other things, etc., is apportioned by the official census once every 10 years. It doesn’t matter if a person is legal or illegal. All that matters is they are present, and fill out the census honestly as far as their residency. Citizenship is not currently a question. In effect, someone in the country illegally CAN affect representation which CAN affect Electoral votes. Basically, the number of people in a State is less important than the number of people in a State that actually participate in the census. Sounds silly. But, that’s the way it works. That’s why there’s always a big push to make sure illegals know they won’t be deported if they fill out the census, and everyone else is pushed to participate. States want their representation, Electoral votes, and funding. California had fewer people fill out the 2020 census than the 2010 census. The reason why doesn’t matter. But, we know from data that CA had one of the largest migrations out of State of any State in the Union. Texas was reversed in the period 2010-2020. Lastly, for someone to assume all Latino/Hispanics are homogenous and automatically vote Democratic is—at best—naive—and at worst—a bad stereotype. That’s wording it as nicely as I can.
-
While I’m glad you are looking a little deeper into the overall history of the Maxwell family, their ties to Epstein and long known/suspected connections to varied Intelligence officials, I’d stress that much of this will probably never be definitively proven. But, there is more than enough history and too many coincidences to just ignore, and Epstein’s name was becoming known in the 80’s. Whether this explains how he was able to get close to so many people in positions of wealth and power or not is a key question. But, it smacks of a classic pyramid blackmail scheme over a period of many decades. Was it done for personal reasons, or for someone else is a question. Ghislaine obviously has many connections to elites, and Israel. She may have been very interested, or have information to provide about terrorists. If the emails in the DOJ file dump are true, why was Epstein asking if she wanted to attend a private meeting about 9/11? Gaetz’ X post may get people looking. But, I’m afraid it’s also another case of the wrong messenger. He’s probably not the best person to be discussing anything related to sex with underage girls. The X post itself was an interesting take.
-
Hope not. He’s pretty much pond scum.
-
I’m not really sure if sexual assault of a child would be a state crime or federal in this scenario. Interesting question. You keep mentioning Ghislaine Maxwell. Did you look up her father, his death & official funeral? I’ve been dropping hints. Quite a murky story. @Reagan post with email attachments about 9/11 meetings add another layer.
-
Someone should create a meme. Messie & Moronna They’re tainting any possible jury pool so bad, you’d think it was planned. They’d have to pick a jury pool from another planet even if they were to ever bring charges against anyone. These members of Congress saying someone’s going to jail is a joke. Congress doesn’t have the authority to do anything but refer to—who?—DOJ for criminal prosecution. Duhhh…
-
Now, let him rush to explain his name in the files like he thought it was so unimportant for others just to be listed. Let him be on the other end of ‘gotcha.’ He and Khanna were still in grade school when Epstein was already involved. Epstein’s name was known way back in the day. He bought SAT for goodness sake. Rush in based on emotion at your own peril, and I STILL haven’t heard of any evidence DOJ can use to actually prosecute anyone. This will end—as I’ve said—with a very low whimper, people will get a glimpse into how questionable some of the ‘so-called elites’ behavior is if they didn’t already know, and the public won’t be satisfied.
-
Wouldn't matter. Just like much of the rest, all that's there is innuendo and smear. I don't see anything coming close to proof of guilt of something. From their own political flyer (near the bottom, of course): Wexner hired Epstein to manage his personal finances in the 1980s. Wexner cut ties with Epstein following Epstein’s 2007 Florida indictment.
-
What I keep saying is, there’s a big difference in someone being named, someone even documented as being there, and being able to prove a criminal case without a doubt when it would probably revert to a circumstantial he said/she said against folks who have the ability to hire the best lawyers on the planet—if you could even get them to trial. There’s no way you’re getting the foreign actors here to stand trial. That’s why I keep saying shame and ostracism are probably what we’ll get.