Leaderboard

My cell is 409-719-7042. Give me a call when you’re concerned about deliverables or budget. If it’s a real concern, I’ll at least tell you what I know in lieu of speculation. So far, no issues with stadium portion of bond. Just can’t fit the design and construction of press box, bathrooms, seating, etc. in before Fall 2020 season. No need to rush it OR hold out on turf installation. So many programs get to benefit by moving forward with the turf - our huge 300+ band, twirlers, flags, cheer, and westernaires won’t have to stay in the stands just because it’s a mud pit on the field. These groups put hours and hours in. Thankful they’ll get to showcase their talents too.

Where is you going with this? I wouldn’t care if the shooters were white black purple. You have no understanding of my viewpoints. I’m educated and have come to my own conclusions about race in America. I think every race in this country has its fraction of people who make It hard on the others. But none of this has anything to do with that. If all persons in video was same color. I’ll still be interested in finding out why no arrests was made until after video was made public. And who shall be held accountable. Everything isn’t about race but I’m not going to act like this country doesn’t have a race problem I’m only 28 and I’ve done witness the worst from both sides almost daily. I have a friend who recently just got disowned by her parents simply because she engaged to a different shade of skin. (It’s not just cnn and democrats it’s real life too).

They did that “Sooner” than everyone else. See what I did there?...

You’re a silly man.

Yeah but he was not coming back from a Duck Hunt walking back home. He chased a guy down and jumped out of the truck with a shotgun to make a misdemeanor arrest.

I’m not disagreeing with you or your stats. But it’s not the killings that are being protested, necessarily. It’s not the number of whites vs number of blacks, etc., etc. Its the issue that black violent crime is treated differently than white violent crime. Especially in the eyes of the law and law enforcement communities. So, all the preaching about black on black and white on black, etc. doesn’t mean dick. Not saying I agree or disagree, but that’s all the hub-bub, Bub.

Eh it’s early. We lost a lot so it will be interesting to see.

Saw where Oklahoma has opened up all high school sports with no restrictions.

No, it’s not all fair game. It has to be relevant to the trial however, if a defendant (or anyone) takes the stand, you can impeach his testimony by trying to show that he is untruthful. For the guys to claim self defense in this case, I believe they are going to have to take the stand to explain their actions. They obviously don’t have to by law and their lawyers can try to make the case without it but it will be difficult with what I think the state attorney is going to bring. Dropping a case or being found not guilty has nothing to do with a lawful arrest. Probable cause is a way different standard than proof beyond s reasonable doubt. Yes I have seen officers sued and successfully. Deadly force is defined (at least in Texas) by statute. It isn’t merely “generally accepted”. DF used on a person is actual use of deadly force but the threat of deadly force (in Texas) with a deadly Weapon can get you up to 99 years in the hoosegow according who you threaten. Up to 20 years for everyone else. That is the mere threat and not even use. i disagree with your struggle over the weapon makes the use of DF would be “completely useable beyond question”. Welllll.... not so much. If a person displays a weapon and/or threatens DF when it isn’t lawful, he loses his use of self defense. I will quote Texas law (as an example as I don’t like looking at GA) on self defense not being lawful. In your terminology, if a mortal was initiated by the deceased. No, if the shooter had no legal standing for displaying the shotgun, morally initiating the struggle is legal by Arbery. He has just as much right of self defense and stand your ground against an unlawful use of force including the threat. This is Texas law when self defense is not lawful: >>>>>(2) did not provoke the person against whom the force was used; and (3) was not otherwise engaged in criminal activity, other than a Class C misdemeanor that is a violation of a law or ordinance regulating traffic at the time the force was used. (b) The use of force against another is not justified: (1) in response to verbal provocation alone;<<<< Does not provoke... if the shooter had no lawful use of a shotgun to stop a man merely running (even away), then the shooter provoked the incident. Also, no defense when engaged in any crime other than C misdemeanor or in other words, a traffic citation. So if brandishing a firearm without the lawful use of self defense is a crime in GA, again (and I bet it is), the shooter broke the law and again, loses lawful self defense. So, you can’t commit a crime and then claim self defense. As my questions were, was an arrest lawful under GA law and was the display of a weapon to make that arrest in that situation lawful. If not lawful on either, case closed. If the shooter displayed the shotgun unlawfully, it is Arbery that had the lawful right of self defense, not the shooter. I am not sure what the Michael Slager case has to do with this except even an officer can’t guess what “may” happen. If so the police could legally shoot anyone because they “may” do something.

Hey RaiderGirl, I think we sent FalconRus back under his rock!

And if the answer to either of my first questions is “no”, we need not proceed any further down the list. If the answer to either is no, the Murder charge is valid. If both are yes, more details are needed but the first two are critical. No valid crime to justify a CA or not having the required knowledge to justify such an arrest and thesec guys need to make the best plea possible. I am not saying those are the facts as I don’t know (nor anyone else reading this) but if you can’t get past both of those, these guys are rightfully in deep trouble.

Some of these side bar arguments and questions are mostly a diversion to prove one way or the other. It didn’t matter if there is a video showing Arbery arguing with the cops two years earlier. It doesn’t matter if he wasn’t completely stable mentally, it doesn’t matter about race relations and who has the most violent community, it doesn’t matter if he was jogging and so on. What matters is GA law on citizen arrest (CA), what the required knowledge is to justify such an arrest and what force or threats can be used. These are the questions that in my opinion matter. Was Arbery committing a crime that GA law allows for a CA? If that existed, did the men have the required direct knowledge of the crime? What force does GA law allow for a CA and is displaying a firearm lawful without provocation of deadly force by the suspect? If the men unlawfully displayed a weapon to apprehend Arbery for a non-violent, did Arbery have the right of self defense and stand your ground against the men? Short of knowing these answers......

Terrence Currington RB. Jasper Josh Tims RB West Orange Stark Chip Ambres QB Westbrook just to name a few

JEFF SPIKES BURKEVILLE RUNNING BACK

Yeah, we are aware of the spate of Oriental spam that has occurred lately. I have been in contact with our web guy and hopefully there is a solution to the issue soon.

Dreylon Miller - Silsbee.

It will be a picture of a mud puddle, in a stirring reminder of and honor to the stadium's deeply rooted traditions. In the center will be placed a commemorative golden sprinkler, which will ceremonially water the turf before every game.

Bubba Bean RB Kirbyville