Leaderboard

It is one of his assist coaches daughter..... Wonder if dad in law got a promotion?

My schedule for this week: Tuesday 2A #17 Chireno at 2A #19 San Augustine Friday 3A #10 Orangefield at 3A #18 East Chambers Saturday Incarnate Word at Lamar

I think they are playing some really good basketball right now. Have won 14 of their last 15 games. Only loss in that span was to Nederland and Livingston did not have their two best players for that game.

The OF at EC should be very interesting.

Huntington was very close to making my top 10 in 4A/3A along with Hamshire-Fannett.

That is a lot of good team in one area. Not sure about the number one for Livingston tho

Trump success makes some folks very sad. 😢

Haven't heard anything from you on the Minnesota somali fraud and the take down of maduro. Have any thoughts?!

Joe Rogan says? Look at your link. Breitbart.com/ENTERTAINMENT Get real with yourself.

I believe Friday Night will be an absolute barn burner! Nothing will be easy! I cannot wait!

SMH!!

Walz not seeking reelection. Not good enough. Needs jail time. [Hidden Content]

Watching some of the news coverage on this, it seems like Maduro is the only Venezuelan criminal the lefties DON'T want in the U.S.

I think it will be interesting to watch the stool pigeons turning in the U.S congressmen on the take. Probably most of the ones protesting. .

Wish I had seen this a week or so ago. Could’ve told y’all then. Joseph isn’t going anywhere and SLC’s had someone else in mind from the start, anyway. All’s well at the Reservation.

Wong Kim Ark was about people lawfully in the country. They immigrated lawfully and had been granted permanent residency. This current case is not about legal immigration. Wong Kim Ark’s family did not commit a crime to enter the United States. In the current case it is about a person entering the United States while committing a crime. Precedents don’t really matter They only matter in trials and lower court rulings. For example locally in Jefferson County, if the police arrest a person and then take a sworn confession from him but the police did not advise the person of his constitutional rights under Miranda, it is an unlawfully obtained confession. Precedent tells the trial judge to disallow the statement and any evidence gathered from the unlawful statement. The Supreme Court however doesn’t have to go by precedent and can overturn its own decisions. An example is that Roe v Wade said that states could not stop abortions within certain limits but in Dobbs v Jackson WHO the precedent was overturned. Some people cried foul because Roe v. Wade had been precedent for 49 years. That can’t be!! But let’s take a trip down memory lane. In 1896 the Supreme Court in Plessy v. Ferguson said that segregation was lawful as long as accommodations were equal. That gave us the phrase separate but equal. Colored water fountains, lunch counters, etc., were constitutional Then in 1954, almost 60 years later, the Supreme Court in Brown v Board of Education said that segregation in schools was unconstitutional, effectively overturning Plessy v Ferguson. Awesome! The Supreme Court overturned a bad ruling in Plessy. Precedents should not be locked into stone. Oh, guaranteed abortions were overturned? Supreme Court precedents should be locked in stone! So apparently one side of the aisle thinks that precedents should stand!! Well, except the ones that we don’t like…..

Now, if he’d only follow the speak softly part…

PNG taking keeping him very serious, it appears.

3-27 in the last 30 district games for PNG....

Joseph locked in PNG now, he just got married to PN resident lol