Leaderboard

Corruption. Neither side can claim the moral high ground. Neither is even a smidge more ethical than the other. That’s what makes it all so laughable. “But those ______s are the bad guys!” No, they ALL have no decency- and we’re all to blame for electing them simply because they use really good insults or whatever. Rs are just as dirty as Ds. So much for “Drain the Swamp,” huh?

We—Boomers—let education get away from us and become taken over by progressive socialists. Add to that a government power structure with an insatiable appetite for more control, and it’s a recipe for disaster. The final straw is to bring in a population that is more used to socialism/communism than capitalism, and you have all the necessary ingredients. That’s why I don’t have an issue with some of what Trump’s doing. It’s the long game. But, if federalism was being followed, we wouldn’t need all these EO’s because the Feds wouldn’t be all up in our business. SCOTUS seems to be trying to reign some of it in, and the progressives are squealing.

"President Trump was right — again," White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "Those who engaged in this political scandal must be held accountable for the fraud they committed against President Trump and the lies they told to the American people." I'm not holding my breath, but it sure would be nice

John Brennan and James "86 47" Comey. [Hidden Content] They have some explaining to do... Love it!

Try to stay on topic, I know it’s hard, but try.

Just like I predicted. On cue after 3 straight losses. smh

If not all the files were given, and many were destroyed during Biden term, what should they do tat they are not doing?

I'm not sure what Trump's health has to do with a Doctor refusing to answer non-health related questions......like, "where you ever told to lie about Biden"....... But, since we are on that subject, he seems to be in dang good health for a 79 year old man. Plays golf, works very longs days......he may be a little over weight......but I would say a good majority of us could stand to lose a few pounds

Funny how a stray tennis ball changed his life forever! Talk about fate stepping in!

Looks like another piece of scum, James Clapper, is under the microscope now too. Kash Patel and Pam Bondi ain't playing.

Hope you don’t mind my adding something else from history that is coming to fruition. It needs to stop with Mamdani:

Our stellar DOJ. Dogs chasing tales (pun intended). What was that they said about Epstein files? Keystone cops at the head of our law enforcement. That can’t end well.

This should be simple but apparently not. There are three branches of government in the Constitution for the separation of powers. One of those is the Executive Branch which is the president and everyone that answers to the president. Article II starts with: The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. Trump fired some bureaucrats from his administration. A federal judge stepped in and said you can’t do that and issued an injunction. The federal judge acted like the Executive Branch is like a union and the head of the Executive Branch, the president, has no control over who serves him without just cause… as approved the the Judicial Branch. An appeal to the Ninth Circus got the same result with a 2-1 vote that the Constitution was wrong and the executive Power doesn’t lie with the president but the Judicial Branch who gets to determine if the president can fire his own bureaucrats. Hmmmmm…. can we say the separation of powers? So an appeal to the Supreme Court resulted in an 8-1 ruling staying the injunction. The ruling was that the government would likely win if the case was fought in trial and then all the way to the Supreme Court where Article II says that the POWER of the Executive Branch will be in a president. Even Kagan and Sotomayor even agreed that yeah, that’s in the very first sentence of Article II. The only dissent was from, you guessed it, Brown Jackson. She is a kook. Her opinion is that the president doesn’t have complete control over the entire Executive Branch…. as is listed in the Constitution. If this was a private enterprise company and the owner wanted to fire an employee, the owner could not do so unless a judge agrees? No wonder she couldn’t define a woman..…..🤣🤣🤣

Just felt I could raise him better, in a more stable environment, and that he shouldn’t have to suffer because she decided she wanted out of our marriage. If we’d had a girl, I probably would have supported all I could—but not pursued managing custody. I would have felt she could’ve connected better with a daughter. Of course, she’s been through 3 husbands since. So, a daughter wouldn’t have had it great either I guess. Meanwhile, I’ve been married to my sweetheart, and lived in the same house, for 35 years. It took a lot for a man to get custody back in the ‘80’s in Texas. I was in and out of court for 5 years. Spent just about every dime I had because she kept accusing me of all kinds of stuff. You know the drill. As a man in a custody battle—guilty until proven innocent.

Ghislaine Maxwell: "if there are no clients"? "Why am I in jail"? Inquiring minds would like to know, rich privilege strikes again! Diddy says hi

[Hidden Content] Part 2. Another instant classic