5GallonBucket Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 Pure evil and if you vote that way you are too and you know exactly who I’m talking to Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 47 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said: Pure evil and if you vote that way you are too and you know exactly who I’m talking to She don’t care Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 1 hour ago, 5GallonBucket said: Pure evil and if you vote that way you are too and you know exactly who I’m talking to Agree, but you’re talking about folks that support a party that’s ok with full term abortion. Many aren’t even aware when stuff like this happens, simply looking for the next handout from the government. The others that are fully aware of this stuff are as you pointed out, evil. And these are the folks we’re supposed to reach across the aisle and compromise with. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 4 hours ago, 5GallonBucket said: Pure evil and if you vote that way you are too and you know exactly who I’m talking to Curious how this works: Title 9 was passed by Congress and signed by the President. So, how can JoeBama arbitrarily change what's in Title 9? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
5GallonBucket Posted April 27 Author Report Share Posted April 27 23 minutes ago, Reagan said: Curious how this works: Title 9 was passed by Congress and signed by the President. So, how can JoeBama arbitrarily change what's in Title 9? How did we get said president how did we allow covid to dictate how does killing a baby become lawful how has every govt entity become weaponized how do we lock our house door but leave the border wide open Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 3 minutes ago, 5GallonBucket said: How did we get said president how did we allow covid to dictate how does killing a baby become lawful how has every govt entity become weaponized how do we lock our house door but leave the border wide open Oh, I know the law means nothing to these devils. Every time Trump blinked someone filed a law suit. Do you know if there's been one filed on this? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted April 27 Report Share Posted April 27 @Big girl What do you think of this?! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted April 28 Report Share Posted April 28 10 hours ago, Reagan said: @Big girl What do you think of this?! 🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗🦗 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted April 29 Report Share Posted April 29 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 On 4/27/2024 at 12:36 PM, Reagan said: @Big girl What do you think of this?! Big girl has went into hiding. I think she knows her sorry arse potus is wrong, but she doesn’t want to acknowledge it. She doesn’t want to get cross ways with the 2-3 liberal posters here. Reagan 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmashMouth Posted April 30 Report Share Posted April 30 On 4/27/2024 at 12:05 PM, Reagan said: Curious how this works: Title 9 was passed by Congress and signed by the President. So, how can JoeBama arbitrarily change what's in Title 9? It's called Executive Order. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted Saturday at 07:01 PM Report Share Posted Saturday at 07:01 PM Protections now include sexual orientation. You can't discriminate based on race, religion, disability, nationality and sexual orientation. Who would want the legal right to discriminate against gay people? Evil people. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted Saturday at 07:39 PM Report Share Posted Saturday at 07:39 PM 38 minutes ago, Big girl said: Protections now include sexual orientation. You can't discriminate based on race, religion, disability, nationality and sexual orientation. Who would want the legal right to discriminate against gay people? Evil people. Who’s being discriminated against? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted Saturday at 08:13 PM Report Share Posted Saturday at 08:13 PM 33 minutes ago, baddog said: Who’s being discriminated against? Reread what I posted. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted Saturday at 10:10 PM Report Share Posted Saturday at 10:10 PM 1 hour ago, Big girl said: Reread what I posted. You are very warped individual if you think it’s ok for a transgender male to compete against a woman. I guess you are like the Supreme Court justice that define what a woman is. Your name implies you are a female. Are you sure that is what you are? Democrats are a hopeless bunch, you included! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted Sunday at 09:24 AM Report Share Posted Sunday at 09:24 AM 13 hours ago, Big girl said: Reread what I posted. Typical lefty answer……no answer. You think I didn’t read it? Telling a biological male he can’t compete with women is not discrimination. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reagan Posted Sunday at 05:30 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 05:30 PM 22 hours ago, Big girl said: Protections now include sexual orientation. You can't discriminate based on race, religion, disability, nationality and sexual orientation. Who would want the legal right to discriminate against gay people? Evil people. I can't believe you think it's alright for males to compete in female sports. Am I misunderstanding your stance? What say you? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Big girl Posted Sunday at 10:28 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 10:28 PM On 5/4/2024 at 5:10 PM, BS Wildcats said: You are very warped individual if you think it’s ok for a transgender male to compete against a woman. I guess you are like the Supreme Court justice that define what a woman is. Your name implies you are a female. Are you sure that is what you are? Democrats are a hopeless bunch, you included! That' was not added. Transgender males still can't compete. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BS Wildcats Posted Sunday at 11:40 PM Report Share Posted Sunday at 11:40 PM 1 hour ago, Big girl said: That' was not added. Transgender males still can't compete. Do you have a problem with it? It is being allowed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baddog Posted Monday at 01:21 AM Report Share Posted Monday at 01:21 AM 2 hours ago, Big girl said: That' was not added. Transgender males still can't compete. What’s a transgender? I don’t understand the concept. Why haven’t past civilizations heard of them? What are they again. Please explain. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmashMouth Posted Monday at 01:01 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 01:01 PM On 5/4/2024 at 2:01 PM, Big girl said: Protections now include sexual orientation. You can't discriminate based on race, religion, disability, nationality and sexual orientation. Who would want the legal right to discriminate against gay people? Evil people. Who would want the legal right for a woman to have to dress out and compete against a biological male with a penis and testicles? It has nothing to do with discriminating against gays. It has everything to do with fairness and respect and safety towards girls/women. It's the "transgender" part that's an issue. Isn't it discrimination against girls who aren't allowed to compete solely against other girls? They're being forced to not only compete in a co-ed league, but to get naked in front of biological males without any choice in the matter. Normalcy is being discriminated against. baddog 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LumRaiderFan Posted Monday at 01:05 PM Report Share Posted Monday at 01:05 PM 3 minutes ago, SmashMouth said: Who would want the legal right for a woman to have to dress out and compete against a biological male with a penis and testicles? It has nothing to do with discriminating against gays. It has everything to do with fairness and respect and safety towards girls/women. It's the "transgender" part that's an issue. Isn't it discrimination against girls who aren't allowed to compete solely against other girls? They're being forced to not only compete in a co-ed league, but to get naked in front of biological males without any choice in the matter. Normalcy is being discriminated against. Well said! SmashMouth 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.