Jump to content

Anahuac (20) @ Orangefield (32) - FINAL


jdawg03

Recommended Posts

9 hours ago, APanthers said:

They are well coached team . They found weak a link in defense and exploited it . But the refs bailed them out I know on 3 different calls 

It was a sloppy game all around on both sides. 
I don’t understand why #5 didn’t get the ball much. Each time he got it it was dangerous for the Bobcats. One TD he literally carried 3 Bobcats into the endzone & broke about 3 tackles. 
 

i have to agree that the line Judge on Orangefield side called 2 terrible “Targeting” penalties on each team. No way was those two targeting. It was helmet to helmet but both weren’t with the Crown of the helmet.  But they may have changed the rules. 
 

There were lots of mouthing on both sides. 
 

good win & I’ll be interested in seeing AP and O play Kirbyville. It could be a 3 way tie. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Gametime5 said:

Great win by Orangefield. They will be district champs again. I see now why they fight so hard to stay in that district they are in. Anahuac will be #2. I thought they missed some major opportunities tonight like not letting #5 just be the guy every play. Terrible call and management on that last drive before halftime, and when the QB didn’t pick up the first down on 4th and 1 or 4th and 2, can’t remember…That was a critical miss.  You could just feel that Orangefield was not going to be stopped the entire 4th quarter.  Congrats to the Bobcats. They showed again that they own this district. Good luck to Anahuac the rest of the year and in the playoffs. 

Yeah as of now unless they change the distric numbers we will be down again for the next 2 years. We are about 40 kids short of moving up

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, Bobcat101 said:

It was a sloppy game all around on both sides. 
I don’t understand why #5 didn’t get the ball much. Each time he got it it was dangerous for the Bobcats. One TD he literally carried 3 Bobcats into the endzone & broke about 3 tackles. 
 

i have to agree that the line Judge on Orangefield side called 2 terrible “Targeting” penalties on each team. No way was those two targeting. It was helmet to helmet but both weren’t with the Crown of the helmet.  But they may have changed the rules. 
 

There were lots of mouthing on both sides. 
 

good win & I’ll be interested in seeing AP and O play Kirbyville. It could be a 3 way tie. 

The Orangefield player lead with the head as well as left his feet (launching). Still don’t agree with it (targeting) but by UIL it was definitely targeting. The Anahuac kid should’ve got on sportsman like conduct his was actually a headbutt in my opinion.

IMG_3127.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, 89Falcon said:

Did it work better than the Anahuac offense?

Hmm hard to say. The slot t works good against the defense Anahuac runs but will not work good against the nickel. Anahuac could’ve ran that 5 yard out with number 5 all night and the bobcats would’ve never stopped it. Anahuac offense looked better in my opinion it was more refined and Orangefields relied on someone on the defense making a mistake and it capitalized on that. So know I don’t think it worked better than Anahuac but it will work grade against the remaking opponents in district if the backs and linemen stay healthy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TxAthlete409 said:

Hmm hard to say. The slot t works good against the defense Anahuac runs but will not work good against the nickel. Anahuac could’ve ran that 5 yard out with number 5 all night and the bobcats would’ve never stopped it. Anahuac offense looked better in my opinion it was more refined and Orangefields relied on someone on the defense making a mistake and it capitalized on that. So know I don’t think it worked better than Anahuac but it will work grade against the remaking opponents in district if the backs and linemen stay healthy.

It is actually "easy" to say. Anahuac could of, would of, should of, Orangefield won the game by two TDs. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, Separation Scientist said:

Beat me to it. They were so bad I forgot Kirbyville was even in this district but they must have fixed whatever was wrong?   

They were good a while back and lost a good coach which led to a drop in participation. They had another new coach come in last year and it looks like he has the program up and running 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/30/2023 at 5:19 PM, TxAthlete409 said:

Hmm hard to say. The slot t works good against the defense Anahuac runs but will not work good against the nickel. Anahuac could’ve ran that 5 yard out with number 5 all night and the bobcats would’ve never stopped it. Anahuac offense looked better in my opinion it was more refined and Orangefields relied on someone on the defense making a mistake and it capitalized on that. So know I don’t think it worked better than Anahuac but it will work grade against the remaking opponents in district if the backs and linemen stay healthy.

Will not work against the nickel? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,944
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Vidor vs HJ - 1 Game Location:  Vidor Date and Time:  Thursday (May 2) at 7pm
    • but will he be doing contact football drills mid-season?
    • That was an awesome video!  I feel so proud of these young men.  They proved the doubters wrong.  Bellville should be proud, too.  I know it didn't end like they had hoped, but we've been there, so we can definitely empathize with them.  Great season, Brahmas!
    • Meh.. Everyone knows this. The kid that got injured wasn't lifting weights. Supposedly he was hit with a helmet in his elbow. In my opinion the kid shouldn't have been put in that situation. AD should've told the Varsity baseball players to sit that one out. I have no issues with the lifting or conditioning. However, anytime helmets/pads are on there is a higher risk of injury. This AD showed a total lack of respect for HIS baseball program. 
    • Maybe.. however..  Many athletic director / head football coach have lost their job despite the athletic program as a whole being successful.. if the football team struggles.  On the other hand, when football teams are doing great but the rest of the program stinks.. AD/HFC still keeps their job. WOS.  Newton. .. programs as a whole were fairly weak during those many years of football power and very few people even knew it.  Or cared. Yet, AD/HFC kept their jobs for years. Meanwhile, I remember an AD/HFC at Barbers Hill lost his job after every program in the school won district championships and even had several team sports (baseball, softball, girls hoops, etc.) making runs at state.  But the football team was mediocre.  Fired. I'm not saying you're wrong, just that perception is reality.  And the perception is that your athletic program can suck as long as football wins.. it doesn't matter how strong the athletic program is if football sucks. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...