Jump to content

New Evidence Shows Just How Biased Trump Judge Is In Jack Smith’s Case!

Reagan

By Reagan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted

From the article:  "Judge Tanya Chutkan, the D.C. federal district court's hanging-ist judge when it comes to the January 6 cases, was (quite coincidentally, I'm sure) assigned to Donald Trump's case after Jack Smith essentially indicted him for believing that the November 2020 election was rife with fraud.  (That's a belief, apparently, available only to Democrats following elections.)  The fact that Chutkan hates January 6 defendants doesn't mean she's anti-Trump.  However, Julie Kelly has revealed a trial transcript in which Chutkan openly states her belief that Trump should be in jail."

This, along with the other three, will be thrown out on appeal.  This is all about politics NOT the rule of law!!

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UT alum

UT alum

Posted
Posted
23 hours ago, Reagan said:

From the article:  "Judge Tanya Chutkan, the D.C. federal district court's hanging-ist judge when it comes to the January 6 cases, was (quite coincidentally, I'm sure) assigned to Donald Trump's case after Jack Smith essentially indicted him for believing that the November 2020 election was rife with fraud.  (That's a belief, apparently, available only to Democrats following elections.)  The fact that Chutkan hates January 6 defendants doesn't mean she's anti-Trump.  However, Julie Kelly has revealed a trial transcript in which Chutkan openly states her belief that Trump should be in jail."

This, along with the other three, will be thrown out on appeal.  This is all about politics NOT the rule of law!!

This is the hidden content, please

You know, this is why blogs aren’t considered news.  This is nothing more than half-baked opinion. The transcript as printed did not show a statement saying “Trump should be in jail”. She said that fealty to one man, who happens to be still free, cost J6 defendants. Any judge who presided over so many cases of guilty people saying “Trump made me do it” might reasonably make the same observation. Think for yourself for once.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
thetragichippy

thetragichippy

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, UT alum said:

You know, this is why blogs aren’t considered news.  This is nothing more than half-baked opinion. The transcript as printed did not show a statement saying “Trump should be in jail”. She said that fealty to one man, who happens to be still free, cost J6 defendants. Any judge who presided over so many cases of guilty people saying “Trump made me do it” might reasonably make the same observation. Think for yourself for once.

The mainstream media does not want anyone thinking for themselves unless they agree with it. If you start questioning things you get silenced, or charged (look at Trump). Think about the Russia hoax with Trump, Hunters laptop(the signed letter from ex cia agents), Covid lockdowns, Covid vaccines......that's just off the top of my head.....if you questioned any of those things you were labeled at minimum a conspiracy theorists.  

One of America's core values is free speech. It does have a cost, you have to use your brain. 

We shouldn't just take the media's word for anything and we certainly should not take the Governments word on anything. Both have been caught being very dishonest

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Setx fan
      2024 Newton Eagles football.

      By Setx fan · Posted

      He's steadily improving rapidly. Not that your opinion matters much based on some of the wild projections you've made on this site 
    • baddog
      BRAGG'S STAR WITNESS

      By baddog · Posted

      Cohen……a lying, backstabbing pos who does nothing but lie every time he opens his mouth. Let him utter words the prosecution wants to hear, and we can convict. Cohen told his ex advisor that he wanted to kill himself. What a worldly loss that would be. Let anyone on this board be put through the wringer with false charges and lies like Trump has had to endure, and you would be screaming at the top of your lungs how illegal all of this is.
    • Separation Scientist
      BRAGG'S STAR WITNESS

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      It was and remains perfectly timed and choregraphed Kangaroo Court, whatever Cohen just said or lied about.  Face it, under Soros installed Biden and Merrick Garland, the USA is now officially a Bananna Republic with a Goverment that weaponizes itself against and destroys its political rivals. Putin and Xi are SO proud!  Dang I miss Democracy.       
    • CardinalBacker
      BRAGG'S STAR WITNESS

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • bullets13
      Governor Abbott pardons Daniel Perry for murder during protest…

      By bullets13 · Posted

      Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...