Jump to content

Winningest programs in Texas High School Football history

dme1111

By dme1111
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

WOSdrummer99

WOSdrummer99

Posted
Posted

Just a small bit of information for those who believed this would last forever. All it would take for WOS to lose this distinction is 11 games. WOS goes 0-11 and SLC goes 11-0. I don't think that's about to happen anytime soon. But it just shows how tight this race is becoming. 

The peak was after the 40 game win streak. In 2017 when we beat Wimberley in the semis it was .807

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted

 

6 hours ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Just a small bit of information for those who believed this would last forever. All it would take for WOS to lose this distinction is 11 games. WOS goes 0-11 and SLC goes 11-0. I don't think that's about to happen anytime soon. But it just shows how tight this race is becoming. 

The peak was after the 40 game win streak. In 2017 when we beat Wimberley in the semis it was .807

Where are you finding those win/loss records?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Bigdog said:

This is the hidden content, please

I'm no sure that Drummer's math is on point.

WOS   440/109/3.... 0.7971

SLC   584/157/8.... 0.7797

 

I'm too lazy to math out how many games would actually have to be won/lost to make a percentage change to favor SLC, but last year the records were 5-6 to 13-1.  Since SLC has played so many more games than WOS over history, it's harder for SLC to gain ground by winning, but easier for WOS to lose ground by losing.  Another 5-6 season would have WOS at 445/158/8, or 0.790.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSdrummer99

WOSdrummer99

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I'm no sure that Drummer's math is on point.

WOS   440/109/3.... 0.7971

SLC   584/157/8.... 0.7797

 

I'm too lazy to math out how many games would actually have to be won/lost to make a percentage change to favor SLC, but last year the records were 5-6 to 13-1.  Since SLC has played so many more games than WOS over history, it's harder for SLC to gain ground by winning, but easier for WOS to lose ground by losing.  Another 5-6 season would have WOS at 445/158/8, or 0.790.

Trust the #s

           Wins    Total     Win %
WOS   440    552    0.7971
SLC    584    749    0.7797
            
0-1    440    553    0.7957
1-0    585    750    0.7800
            
0-2    440    554    0.7942
2-0    586    751    0.7803
            
0-3    440    555    0.7928
3-0    587    752    0.7806
            
0-4    440    556    0.7914
4-0    588    753    0.7809
            
0-5    440    557    0.7899
5-0    589    754    0.7812
            
0-6    440    558    0.7885
6-0    590    755    0.7815
            
0-7    440    559    0.7871
7-0    591    756    0.7817
            
0-8    440    560    0.7857
8-0    592    757    0.7820
            
0-9    440    561    0.7843
9-0    593    758    0.7823
            
0-10    440    562    0.7829
10-0    594    759    0.7826
            
0-11    440    563    0.7815
11-0    595    760    0.7829

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSdrummer99

WOSdrummer99

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, CardinalBacker said:

but last year the records were 5-6 to 13-1

Now this way takes 2 seasons...

wos        440    552    0.7971
slc          584    749    0.7797
 W    L            
  5    6    445    563    0.7904
13    1    597    763    0.7824
                
  5    6    450    574    0.7840
13    1    610    777    0.7851

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Trust the #s

           Wins    Total     Win %
WOS   440    552    0.7971
SLC    584    749    0.7797
            
0-1    440    553    0.7957
1-0    585    750    0.7800
            
0-2    440    554    0.7942
2-0    586    751    0.7803
            
0-3    440    555    0.7928
3-0    587    752    0.7806
            
0-4    440    556    0.7914
4-0    588    753    0.7809
            
0-5    440    557    0.7899
5-0    589    754    0.7812
            
0-6    440    558    0.7885
6-0    590    755    0.7815
            
0-7    440    559    0.7871
7-0    591    756    0.7817
            
0-8    440    560    0.7857
8-0    592    757    0.7820
            
0-9    440    561    0.7843
9-0    593    758    0.7823
            
0-10    440    562    0.7829
10-0    594    759    0.7826
            
0-11    440    563    0.7815
11-0    595    760    0.7829

Nice work. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
CardinalBacker

CardinalBacker

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Now this way takes 2 seasons...

wos        440    552    0.7971
slc          584    749    0.7797
 W    L            
  5    6    445    563    0.7904
13    1    597    763    0.7824
                
  5    6    450    574    0.7840
13    1    610    777    0.7851

I don’t think it happens in two years, but three-four isn’t unrealistic. 
 

Do the faithful have anything to say about the upcoming season? I was thinking that WOS graduated a bunch of starters, but you’d know better than me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
wo-s#1

wo-s#1

Posted
Posted
36 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I don’t think it happens in two years, but three-four isn’t unrealistic. 
 

Do the faithful have anything to say about the upcoming season? I was thinking that WOS graduated a bunch of starters, but you’d know better than me. 

Had enough return last year to make a difference and as we all know it didn’t!Returning players are irrelevant unless scheme changes imo,hopefully something changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSdrummer99

WOSdrummer99

Posted
Posted
41 minutes ago, CardinalBacker said:

I don’t think it happens in two years, but three-four isn’t unrealistic. 
 

Do the faithful have anything to say about the upcoming season? I was thinking that WOS graduated a bunch of starters, but you’d know better than me. 

Year 2 will be very interesting. 2 things have to happen. Kids have to be learning the system. System has to be learning the kids. Coaches had their rookie learning curve. Now they know what didn't work. Should be easy. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Buddy Garrity

Mr. Buddy Garrity

Posted
Posted
30 minutes ago, wo-s#1 said:

Had enough return last year to make a difference and as we all know it didn’t!Returning players are irrelevant unless scheme changes imo,hopefully something changes.

 

9 minutes ago, WOSdrummer99 said:

Year 2 will be very interesting. 2 things have to happen. Kids have to be learning the system. System has to be learning the kids. Coaches had their rookie learning curve. Now they know what didn't work. Should be easy. 

I don't think year 2 will go like year 1, too much talent there. 

 

If they spice up the turkey burgers it might be another special season 🤷🏾‍♂️😁

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

Jasper sits at the 87th spot on top win %. 

596-358-30 = .6057

something isn't right though because we are listed as the #33 spot on all time win list with 663.

Both list say they are current thru the 2022 season.

I have found over the years that the more sites you visit on records, the more differences each show.

If I found two with the same numbers, I went with that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSdrummer99

WOSdrummer99

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Dirty_but_Dazzling said:

Jasper sits at the 87th spot on top win %. 

596-358-30 = .6057

something isn't right though because we are listed as the #33 spot on all time win list with 663.

Both list say they are current thru the 2022 season.

No it's right. The numbers just don't line up on the win % list. Jasper is 10 up from the bottom of this list.

663-394-38 = .6055

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bigdog

Bigdog

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, AggiesAreWe said:

I have found over the years that the more sites you visit on records, the more differences each show.

If I found two with the same numbers, I went with that.

I tend to use the site I linked, since it is using Joe Lee Smiths numbers and he was a known historian of the game and usually pretty accurate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • 1970
      It's a great day in SETX!

      By 1970 · Posted

      What the writer stated wrt crossover votes in the primary/runoff: "Covey and his supporters Paxton and Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said Phelan only won because Democrats crossed over to vote in the Republican Primary for him. Paxton said Covey’s campaign identified “at least” 1,442 Democrats who voted early in Jefferson County in the primary runoff. Texas does not have party registration, but a voter’s primary voting history is public. The Covey campaign has not released its methodology behind its claim, but  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  by The Texan news website found that 9% of Republican voters in the March District 21 primary had voted in one of the previous four Democratic primaries. However, only 5% of that group had voted in all four previous Democratic primaries. What Phelan’s opponents did not mention is historically Democratic Jefferson County is undergoing a political transition towards the Republican party — the county judge switched his affiliation to the GOP in 2017 — so many residents have a mixed primary voting history. And Phelan’s allies in the House dismissed the idea that liberals swung the election. "I knocked on doors, hundreds and hundreds of doors, made calls for Dade,” Republican Rep. Jeff Leach, R-Plano, said on Mark Davis’ radio program Wednesday. “I did not speak to a single Democrat down here in HD21. Not a single one." "  
    • 1970
      Will Biden Be The Democratic Nominee For President?

      By 1970 · Posted

      He's with it enough to do what he's told, beginning day 1 when he signed the order to revoke the Keystone Pipeline project.  But more recently, he's protecting the DOJ, as well as himself ...  This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up  
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

    • Big girl
      Will Biden Be The Democratic Nominee For President?

      By Big girl · Posted

      Most 75-80 year Olds have some type of cognitive impairment. If you are asking if Biden has dementia then my answer is no. That is a Republican talking point. If you all think he has dementia what type do you think he has?
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      A lot better showing from the Ags tonight!   Bring on Oregon 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...