Jump to content

I can't believe....


CardinalBacker

Recommended Posts

7 hours ago, 45thAND46thSucks said:

We need to have the same energy about all unarmed ppl getting shot and ignoring orders... until then I don't feel a tad bit sorry for her

O yea, and cry a lil harder 🤣 

You have to be one of the most uninformed individuals on this board although you have one or two running a close second. Lol. Actually I believe your InMAGAweTrust who got a new IP address. Your beta male crying sounds almost the same. 🤣

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

You have to be one of the most uninformed individuals on this board although you have one or two running a close second. Lol. Actually I believe your InMAGAweTrust who got a new IP address. Your beta male crying sounds almost the same. 🤣

 

Personalities are difficult to hide. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Unwoke said:

You have to be one of the most uninformed individuals on this board although you have one or two running a close second. Lol. Actually I believe your InMAGAweTrust who got a new IP address. Your beta male crying sounds almost the same. 🤣

 

No doubt about it, that’s why I don’t even waste my time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hard to believe, hard core liberals like Bill Maher realize how far off the political scale the Dems have gone, but there’s still some folks drinking the kool-aid.  I’m reminded of the old saying, “There’s none so blind as he that will not see”.  This unwarranted fear of Donald Trump is a real, serious mental illness.  They’ve forgotten that prior to COVID we had unparalleled economic prosperity.  More black & hispanics had jobs than ever before.  Our enemies retreated from their intimidation posture. Members of NATO were finally paying their fair share.  Yes, life was not just good, it was very good.  And that fellow posters explains the Dems fear of the man. He did to much, to well.  He did put America first.  Hasn’t happened since Reagan. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Reagan said:

Jan. 6 Commission primetime hearing was a ratings ‘BOMB’ for CBS, NBC, ABC.  If any of the January 6 Commission’s hearings are again scheduled to take place in prime time, it’s entirely possible that the networks will take a “hard pass” next time!

This is the hidden content, please

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 45thAND46thSucks said:

Funny you say he accuses! Isn't he accused of something? 🤔

Does that make the statement wrong concerning the "show" committee?  Did you know that this is the first time in the history of the Congress, that the minority leader was "not" allowed to put on a committee who they wanted?  If this is above board and honest, why do you think this is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Does that make the statement wrong concerning the "show" committee?  Did you know that this is the first time in the history of the Congress, that the minority leader was "not" allowed to put on a committee who they wanted?  If this is above board and honest, why do you think this is?

Minority leader 🤣!!! R's always crying and losing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, Reagan said:

Does that make the statement wrong concerning the "show" committee?  Did you know that this is the first time in the history of the Congress, that the minority leader was "not" allowed to put on a committee who they wanted?  If this is above board and honest, why do you think this is?

Jim jordan tell you that?  🤣 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/10/2022 at 9:05 AM, Unwoke said:

Same reason Fox News who seems to have more viewers than all the other networks combined didn’t air it because it’s nothing more than propaganda and lies. Here’s Tucker Carlson giving you a good reason as to why. Found this clip on the left leaning Twitter platform. Nothing but a sham like the 2 impeachment trials. Lol. Prove him wrong in what he is saying, nothing but facts Jack. Cry Harder….Lol

 


 

 

 

Do you think it is OK for a violent mob to storm a federal building?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 6/10/2022 at 10:39 AM, Unwoke said:

That’s cute but Biden is the one who tried to get mandates in place for a vaccine that doesn’t work an if they didn’t get it they would lose their jobs. In in some cases some people did lose their job. Lol. Lucky the courts shot down that nonsense. Nice liberal twist. Show me we’re Trump tried to implement vaccine mandates? Lol
 

I corrected your stupid liberal twist.

 

How is this relevant to the conversation?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

Are you referring to the summer of Love via the left wing nut jobs torching federal buildings, businesses and actually killing people?

Got a feeling the left will attempt the same thing the terrorists and "patriots" did Jan 6th one day and the right will sing a different tune... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
    • So biden's a creepy old pedophile after all...shocker! But that's where the smart votes are landing.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...