Jump to content

Trump Says He Authorized National Guard Before Jan. 6 -- But Pelosi 'Turned It Down'!


Reagan

Recommended Posts

On 1/21/2022 at 1:14 PM, 5GallonBucket said:

I wonder why🤔

Same reason the FBI is so vague about their involvement.  Half the demonstrators were FBI agents (not really half but a bunch).  The real demonstrators were used.  Whole thing was a setup.  Pelosi & the Dems wanted it to happen.  They’re so scared of Trump there’s no limit to what they’d do to smear him.  But I’m preaching to the choir. 😄
 

The FBI involvement reminds me of the last significant days of the KKK.  It was common knowledge that if all the FBI agents quit the Klan there wouldn’t be enough Klansmen to have a rally. 😂😂😂
 

Ironically a real investigation into Jan 6th would be of Pelosi & the FBI’s involvement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Hagar said:

Same reason the FBI is so vague about their involvement.  Half the demonstrators were FBI agents (not really half but a bunch).  The real demonstrators were used.  Whole thing was a setup.  Pelosi & the Dems wanted it to happen.  They’re so scared of Trump there’s no limit to what they’d do to smear him.  But I’m preaching to the choir. 😄
 

The FBI involvement reminds me of the last significant days of the KKK.  It was common knowledge that if all the FBI agents quit the Klan there wouldn’t be enough Klansmen to have a rally. 😂😂😂
 

Ironically a real investigation into Jan 6th would be of Pelosi & the FBI’s involvement.

In 1977 it was confirmed that 400 members of the mainstream press were considered intelligence assets of the CIA, who served to disseminate propaganda for the government. What do you think that number is today? “Operation Mockingbird” can be researched by anybody.
 

The question isn’t whether the news is fake, that’s been decided, it’s whether it was always this fake and we didn’t know it then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Unwoke said:

In 1977 it was confirmed that 400 members of the mainstream press were considered intelligence assets of the CIA, who served to disseminate propaganda for the government. What do you think that number is today? “Operation Mockingbird” can be researched by anybody.
 

The question isn’t whether the news is fake, that’s been decided, it’s whether it was always this fake and we didn’t know it then.

Between fake and feeding at the teat of the Democratic teat, I’ll take fake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,954
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    fasedo9317
    Newest Member
    fasedo9317
    Joined


  • Posts

    • He actually had a pretty solid year for a sophomore starting in that district. I can assure you, it hasn't hurt his recruiting at all and that will only improve with the move back to the Wack. 
    • If Crumedy eventually has bigger aspirations than being in Jasper, every aspect of the program will be looked at when someone interviews him for any job. He knows that. The mindset needs to be that any time someone wears a Jasper uniform, that they're doing everything they possibly can to win. It matters.
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up It's a poll but I could definitely see this as realistic.   From the article: Catholics in the United States have swung dramatically against President Biden in recent years, now boasting a significant statistical break towards his GOP challenger. Pew Research released on Apr. 30 a report exploring support for presidential candidates sorted by religious affiliation. The poll found that 55% of Catholics support or lean towards supporting former President Donald Trump in a head-to-head against Biden. Conversely, only 45% of Catholics support Biden in the same one-on-one pairing. The 12% margin of support in favor of Trump marks a significant shift from 2020, when he held an extremely narrow lead — 50% to 49%. Biden currently leads among Hispanic Catholics with a narrow 49%-47% split, but the close contest marks a major shift rightward for the demographic. In 2020, a similar poll from Pew Research found Hispanic Catholics preferred Biden to Trump with a staggering 67%-26% split.
    • You said a lot there. Truthfully, that is the root of the issue. Who cares what a kid thinks about how coaches are running a program? Kids play, coaches coach. For some reason, parents have this backward in a lot of places and its wreaking havoc. 
    • He's already stated he's a huge Clinton fan.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...