Jump to content

Just Saw That Even The Boston Marathon Bomber Will Get A $1,400 Check!

Reagan

By Reagan
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Reagan said:

Also heard that an Amendment was put up to stop any stimulus money from going to prisoners and ALL DEMOCRATS VOTED AGAINST IT!!!!  Can anyone explain the logic?!

You can bet there are some that won’t!!

Big girl, silly willy, pamfam, nappyroots, bluedove, or any others I may have missed. Do any of you dare explain this?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Still no response to why this was not a problem until the 3rd round. Why was trump sending stimulus to prisoners?

Maybe no response because you’re asking the question to folks that always had a problem with the stimulus packages.  Why send checks to folks that didn’t lose their job?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PAMFAM10

PAMFAM10

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Maybe no response because you’re asking the question to folks that always had a problem with the stimulus packages.  Why send checks to folks that didn’t lose their job?

Can you show me the thread or even a comment on the issue before now?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 hour ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Still no response to why this was not a problem until the 3rd round. Why was trump sending stimulus to prisoners?

This is what it looks like you are trying to convince us you are in the "middle of the road?!"  But, having inmagawetrust agreeing with you is not a good sign!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chester86

Chester86

Posted
Posted
9 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

I’m just curious why is this now a problem On the 3rd round and obviously not a problem the first two rounds....

 Lied I’m not curious on that at all.

It’s a problem EVERY time, as is the same when they add million, billions or trillions into a bill that is completely unrelated such as the “stimulus”.  The government “be happy with your check” but don’t you dare say anything about the gender study money to Uzbekistan.  I say that very pointedly at ALL politicians.  Get elected - get rich.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

Still no response to why this was not a problem until the 3rd round. Why was trump sending stimulus to prisoners?

I could have rat-holed my first stimulus check. I spent it with a local merchant instead to “stimulate” the economy. They are the ones who are really in need. If one does not understand the absolute importance of the local businessman, one would be stupid. These businesses hurting from being shutdown is why people are out of work. This is just an opportunity for you to take a Trump shot. You should be taking a shot at Pelosi ( there’s an idea). She’s the one who held up the first check and had prisoners included. Trump was backed into a corner. He didn’t want to sign the damn thing, but Americans were suffering, so he signed it. I’ll spend my 3rd one when I get it. Hope you do the same. 
As for you screaming hypocrisy, would that same hypocrisy have existed with the railroading of Kavanaugh with witness testimony being considered “PROOF”, but witness testimony claiming fraudulent election results was not good enough? Do you see how stupid that sounds? How about going after Cuomo? Trump says something offbeat about women (verbal) and you want to hang him, but Cuomo has women coming out of the woodwork with sexual advances claims (physical) but not one negative comment about that. Not one!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PAMFAM10

PAMFAM10

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, baddog said:

I could have rat-holed my first stimulus check. I spent it with a local merchant instead to “stimulate” the economy. They are the ones who are really in need. If one does not understand the absolute importance of the local businessman, one would be stupid. These businesses hurting from being shutdown is why people are out of work. This is just an opportunity for you to take a Trump shot. You should be taking a shot at Pelosi ( there’s an idea). She’s the one who held up the first check and had prisoners included. Trump was backed into a corner. He didn’t want to sign the damn thing, but Americans were suffering, so he signed it. I’ll spend my 3rd one when I get it. Hope you do the same. 
As for you screaming hypocrisy, would that same hypocrisy have existed with the railroading of Kavanaugh with witness testimony being considered “PROOF”, but witness testimony claiming fraudulent election results was not good enough? Do you see how stupid that sounds? How about going after Cuomo? Trump says something offbeat about women (verbal) and you want to hang him, but Cuomo has women coming out of the woodwork with sexual advances claims (physical) but not one negative comment about that. Not one!

I’m not the poster who believes one side is good one side is bad. I don’t like democrats either so I’m confused on your reply. So let me clear this I don’t like republicans don’t like democrats. I like the freedom of thinking for myself.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
8 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

I’m not the poster who believes one side is good one side is bad. I don’t like democrats either so I’m confused on your reply. So let me clear this I don’t like republicans don’t like democrats. I like the freedom of thinking for myself.

Very good, now apply that to never pointing out hypocrisy about Trump’s stimulus package and the third one. My reply was not confusing.....only to those who don’t want to understand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
29 minutes ago, PAMFAM10 said:

I’m not the poster who believes one side is good one side is bad. I don’t like democrats either so I’m confused on your reply. So let me clear this I don’t like republicans don’t like democrats. I like the freedom of thinking for myself.

So does just about everyone else.  But no matter how much of a free thinker you are, the elected politicians have an impact on our lives.

Neither side is normally good for us, but one side is better for us that like to work and keep as much of our money as possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
PAMFAM10

PAMFAM10

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

So does just about everyone else.  But no matter how much of a free thinker you are, the elected politicians have an impact on our lives.

Neither side is normally good for us, but one side is better for us that like to work and keep as much of our money as possible.

I like to work and keep my money. I’m a Christian man. Keep believing that the other side is boogeymen that’s how they control you. This two party system just isn’t working.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, PAMFAM10 said:

I like to work and keep my money. I’m a Christian man. Keep believing that the other side is boogeymen that’s how they control you. This two party system just isn’t working.

If you can’t see that the democrats are more destructive to the country then you are the one being controlled.  I never see you complaining about the policies of the democrats...maybe you should try practicing what you preach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • SmashMouth
      Baton Rouge split in half?

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • tvc184
      Baton Rouge split in half?

      By tvc184 · Posted

      We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • AggiesAreWe
      What has happened to Jasper?

      By AggiesAreWe · Posted

      Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • SmashMouth
      Even More From The Friendly muslims!

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • AHUDDLESTON
      What has happened to Jasper?

      By AHUDDLESTON · Posted

      Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...