Jump to content

*The Chalk Talk Thread/What Would You Do?*


KFDM COOP

Recommended Posts

Here is another element to the Chalk Talk I want to bring in. This one involves strategy. Recently, the Hawaii-Louisiana Tech game made me think of this senario.

Let's say that you are facing a high-powered offense and it is a high scoring game and the game is a district game that is the decider on whether you go to the playoffs or stay at home. Your offense has managed to stay in the game and you find yourself down by one pending an extra point to tie the game and send it into overtime or a win pending a successful two point attempt. You know your defense will not stop the high-powered offense in overtime and your offense is not exactly equipped to handle shoot outs with a high octane offense.

What do you do? Lay it all on the line and go for the win? Or do you take the extra point and send it to overtime and take your chances? As you know, the extra point is not exactly a given. Neither is the two pointer.

Season is on the line.. You make the call! Explain your reasons for making your choice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Around this time of the game, I'm either excited, nerved up, or very very angry.  In this case, I would be very excited at this point with the above senerio.  I would kick the extra point and hope I win the coin flip.  Obviously, your offense did someting to keep you in the game to this point.  I wouldnt' go for the 2 points at the end of regulation because your either a genius or a dope.  50/50 chance.  I'm conserative so the FG would be kicked by me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Around this time of the game, I'm either excited, nerved up, or very very angry.  In this case, I would be very excited at this point with the above senerio.  I would kick the extra point and hope I win the coin flip.  Obviously, your offense did someting to keep you in the game to this point.  I wouldnt' go for the 2 points at the end of regulation because your either a genius or a dope.  50/50 chance.  I'm conserative so the FG would be kicked by me.

reference the Dayton/Central game last year
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, no.  That's one of those things that happened.  The FG got blocked in that game and the first time all last year.  We had a good kicker.  That was a great play by Dayton.  on that play, the chances of Central missing that extra point was less than 10%.  So the chances of making it was 90%.  I'll take those chances with Coop's senerio.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest ECBucFan

I stare my offense in the eye...and demand they prove their manhood....by ramming that ball right over the goalline. No fancy tricks, or finnesse passes, just simply line up and smash it in, and WIN THE GAME!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm telling you I saw Jasper go for the extra point against Gilmer. It still hunts them I know. Every time they went for two, they converted. At the end they were in this situation. The went for the tie. They missed it. You play to win. You gota go for the win. I would.                                                                                                         

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm telling you I saw Jasper go for the extra point against Gilmer. It still hunts them I know. Every time they went for two, they converted. At the end they were in this situation. The went for the tie. They missed it. You play to win. You gota go for the win. I would.                                                                                                           

My thoughts exactly. Play to win. I gain my teams confidence by asking them, "You want to win it?"  Of course the answer will always be yes from the kids.  :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OMG!!! :o :o :o :o

Soulja com'on man, 2000 Deer Park. Dixon could have went for two for win. Playoff chances riding on this. He kicked extra point. Ball hits center in the ---. Game over. No playoffs and all the players told me they asked him to go for the 2 points. As a matter of fact, C Coleman the kicker told enoch he didn't feel comfortable kicking in that situation.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined


  • Posts

    • He's steadily improving rapidly. Not that your opinion matters much based on some of the wild projections you've made on this site 
    • Cohen……a lying, backstabbing pos who does nothing but lie every time he opens his mouth. Let him utter words the prosecution wants to hear, and we can convict. Cohen told his ex advisor that he wanted to kill himself. What a worldly loss that would be. Let anyone on this board be put through the wringer with false charges and lies like Trump has had to endure, and you would be screaming at the top of your lungs how illegal all of this is.
    • It was and remains perfectly timed and choregraphed Kangaroo Court, whatever Cohen just said or lied about.  Face it, under Soros installed Biden and Merrick Garland, the USA is now officially a Bananna Republic with a Goverment that weaponizes itself against and destroys its political rivals. Putin and Xi are SO proud!  Dang I miss Democracy.       
    • I haven’t been watching closely, but even the liberal sources even tell the story as “the defense really took apart Cohen’s testimony on Thursday.” It sounds like sloppy work from the prosecution to point out a specific call as being “the one,” when it was easily concluded that this particular call could not have occurred the way that Cohen (and the prosecution) claim it to have happened.    The bad news is that I doubt that it matters much-I suspect that most jurors minds were closed before testimony started.   I don’t see Trump leaving with anything less than a conviction based on the venue (NYC).
    • Tough case all the way around.  The guy had a lot of online activity come out where he made racist statements and statements about killing BLM protesters and looters.  So when he then goes out and does it, it looks really bad.  I've seen a lot of videos where people have driven through protestors, defended themselves against them, etc., and didn't bat an eye.  This feels different, but that doesn't necessarily make it murder, either.  His account of the events that happened vs. the witness accounts were both very different, but I'd also expect both sides' accounts to be self-serving and inaccurate to fit their narrative.  Not really sure what to think on this one.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...