Jump to content

Silsbee vs. PNG predictions


Master T

Recommended Posts

i does not matter if PNG is ranked if Silsbee holds on to the ball they will win they are faster than PNG the only reason why it would be a close game is because the Tigers defense needs some more work but other than that Silsbee's offense is going to pound that ball across the goal line

i dont see how there gunna do that  and how they are to fast  lamarque or crosby wasnt to fast and i knnow there not faster than them...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 110
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I agree with some, but the QB isn't mobile, and has thrown half of his passes over the WR's heads or thrown it short. When he does throw a good one the WR are dropping it. He needs to learn to scan the entire field instead of looking at one WR the whole play. The other teams defense isn't that stupid.

Tatum cant be mobile and scan the field when hes running for his life, no blocking for the QB, if silsbee thinks they are gonna score alot they better think again our "D" is gonna intoduce themselves several times, just ask Crosby their only score was in the first 2 minutes of the game and they never did again :-*

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PN-G at Silsbee

Let's see.... PN-G has zero wins and zero touchdowns, but are yet ranked in the top 20 in Region 3. Look for the PN-G offense to finally get on track in Silsbee and finally score some offensive points. The defense will slow down Silsbee enough to get the tribe their first victory.

TOUPS GRAPHICS PREDICTS

PN-G 17 SILSBEE 7

For more predictions go to...

http://www.toupsgraphics.com/fridaynightlights.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

OK, lets see, here we go. This is the way I see it from what I have read from the people on this thread. Silsbee has a young offense that can move the ball and score points. Young offense, so hold on to the ball! PN-G has a really, really, really good defense that has kept them in there games. Silsbee has a young defense that is a work in progress, that also found a way to stop Sterling several times when it had to. PN-G has a confusing offense that not even there fans can stand unless it is just run, run run that has not scored any points against two good teams. This is what I see happening. The Silsbee offense, if they can hold on to the ball, will pose the best  test yet for that really good PN-G defense. That really good PN-G defense will be a better test for Silsbees young offense than what we had last week. Now, as for PN-G offense, third times the charm. And as for Silsbees work in progress, the coaches will keep working em and find the right formula so light em up boys because the purple herd is coming and there looking for a party!!! Go Tigers!!!

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is what I see happening. The Silsbee offense, if they can hold on to the ball, will pose the best  test yet for that really good PN-G defense.  

Good post Tiger85, but c'mon, the "best test" of the season?  Even IF they had held onto the ball, I'd have to say that LM would have been the "best test" so far this season.

I thought I'd bump this thread to the top so all those wise folks that picked Silsbee over PNG could re-read their posts and see what a fool they were.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good post Tiger85, but c'mon, the "best test" of the season?  Even IF they had held onto the ball, I'd have to say that LM would have been the "best test" so far this season.

I thought I'd bump this thread to the top so all those wise folks that picked Silsbee over PNG could re-read their posts and see what a fool they were.

Harsh words.  I will be sure to remember them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tigersvoice

Ya might be right.  I think what I really meant to say was "Look and see how foolish you look now".  No intent to call anyone names....I'm still waiting to watch the crow eatin' though.

Me thinks we have some "Moderators" that are a bit too biased to be efficient "Moderators."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tigersvoice

PNG wins this game. They have played some good teams the past couple of weeks.

Well spoken Ned11str8 - simple, concise, to the point, and "Dead-On" in the evaluation of PNG's first two games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Being a moderator doesn't remove me from my allegience to my team.  The FACT is if someone's going to spout off and make bold predictions, when they are proven grossely wrong, they should man up and eat a bit of crow.  Lord knows I've eaten my share of it, on here and other boards too.  To say that someone "looks foolish" is about as "un-biased' a comment that I can muster given the outlandish predictions some of the Tiger fans made.

If I had  the same comment about a WOS or PAM fan, you wouldn't be on here complaining.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest tigersvoice

Being a moderator doesn't remove me from my allegience to my team.  The FACT is if someone's going to spout off and make bold predictions, when they are proven grossely wrong, they should man up and eat a bit of crow.  Lord knows I've eaten my share of it, on here and other boards too.  To say that someone "looks foolish" is about as "un-biased' a comment that I can muster given the outlandish predictions some of the Tiger fans made.

If I had  the same comment about a WOS or PAM fan, you wouldn't be on here complaining.

Sir, my statement was that "Me thinks some "Moderators" are too

biased to be "Moderators."  I stick by my statement.  I don't see any complaining in the statement; what complaint are you referring to?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • The problem as well as that all of the social justice warriors, influencers, and instigators repeat these lies in the immediate days after the event, garnering outrage.  But when they're proven false they never go back and rescind their outrage-causing posts, they just move on to the next one.
    • I just find it really hard to believe that Trump will select a VP based on the votes they bring him.  He's going to want a Trumper that will affirm his every move and stoke his ego.  I'm hoping I'm wrong, but I doubt it.  And as you said, in these battle ground states a few tenths of a % point may be enough to swing the whole election.  Trump can't afford a VP who will cost him votes (Noem would cost him full points, not just tenths), but also needs a candidate that will bring in as many votes as possible.  So hopefully whichever Trump disciple he chooses has some political appeal to swing voters.
    • Good news for this district is for the next two seasons your bi district opposition shouldn’t be much of a challenge… Royal may be better next year but other than that the district is pretty rough… Very good chance that it’s a clean sweep though
    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...