Jump to content

Trump sent by God?


UT alum

Recommended Posts

I saw Mike Pompeo on CBN actually say that he believes Trump was sent by God to protect Israel.  Does anyone here believe he is so anointed?  I've never seen such a ludicrous display of kissing up to a superior.  Is deification next?  Go to the bottom of the interview to see what that arrogant excuse for a leader said about salvation and the Lord Jesus.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, baddog said:

Why in the heck would anyone on the left be offended by this? You boo God at your conventions.

Sick and tired of having to dot every I and cross every T for two faced dims.

I’ve been to state conventions and have never heard God booed. Why would you make such a repugnant remark? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, UT alum said:

What wound up in the platform? Freedom of belief and separation of church and state are legitimate points of view. God wasn’t booed. Policy disagreements were voiced. I reiterate, what wound up in the platform?

Nice try, but they booed God.  Policy-molicy.  If you really think they didn’t Boo God, then tell me, why was God taken out of the platform.  And you know the only reason God was put back in was because Romney was making an issue of it.  Yes, freedom of belief and separation of church and state are different points of view, but a political platform is not a “state”.

The really pathetic part, the Dems cater (fall over backward, kowtow, lick the shoes) to several groups who don’t like God, or make a mockery of Christianity through debauchery.and repeated sinful liaisons.  And their recent cheering of infanticide, certainly not something God would approve of, was just another slap in the face to almost all Christians.  And according to the NY Post, it’s not over yet.  Add to that their new found acceptance of racism, and approval of abusing women, and what do you get?  Four more years of Trump.  God help me, I do love it so.

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Hagar said:

Nice try, but they booed God.  Policy-molicy.  If you really think they didn’t Boo God, then tell me, why was God taken out of the platform.  And you know the only reason God was put back in was because Romney was making an issue of it.  Yes, freedom of belief and separation of church and state are different points of view, but a political platform is not a “state”.

The really pathetic part, the Dems cater (fall over backward, kowtow, lick the shoes) to several groups who don’t like God, or make a mockery of Christianity through debauchery.and repeated sinful liaisons.  And their recent cheering of infanticide, certainly not something God would approve of, was just another slap in the face to almost all Christians.  And according to the NY Post, it’s not over yet.  Add to that their new found acceptance of racism, and approval of abusing women, and what do you get?  Four more years of Trump.  God help me, I do love it so.

This is the hidden content, please

The New York Post has as much credibility with me as the Times does with you. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Take the time to look at the writer.

UT alum, like most democrats, lives by the “ignorance is bliss” credo.  When it comes to their beloved Party, they are the three monkeys.

Also, notice he didn’t answer my question - why did they take God out of their platform to begin with?  So let’s hear it from the Left, not just UT alum, anyone on the Left.  Pray tell, why did the Democrats take God out of their platform?  I’ll wait.......

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/22/2019 at 6:49 PM, UT alum said:

I’ve been to state conventions and have never heard God booed. Why would you make such a repugnant remark? 

Same thing as booing. The left hate Jesus and love them some muslims.

Pennsylvania state Dems slam Republican's prayer as 'offensive,' bigoted

 

This is the hidden content, please

 

Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at

This is the hidden content, please

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...
    • Great playoff run, no doubt.  They did make the 3rd round(1 less) 4 of the previous 10 years, only one first round loss. 6 district championships and 4 second place.  The only 4 years Carthage was in the same district. So no, I'm not sure it does make sense.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...