Jump to content

Magazine, The New Yorker Slams Chick-fil-a

Hagar

By Hagar
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

TxHoops

TxHoops

Posted
Posted

Chick-Fil-A has the best product and the best service in comparison with its competitors (imo of course).   In the end, that’s why they are and will continue to be successful.  I never cease to be amazed at how well and gracefully they handle huge crowds, especially in the drive through.  

The fact that they are Christian-owned is a nice aside for me.  But if their food and service was like many FF joints I could name, I wouldn’t patronize them either.  

You can agree or disagree with Chick-Fil-A or Starbucks’ politics.   But neither of them are going anywhere, absent some very agregious mismanagement.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 71
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

baddog
baddog

Let's see. Help me if I miss a few. In this country we can say the president is giving Putin BJ's, threaten to blow up the White House, show images of the president decapitated, say "F" Trump on natio

TxHoops
TxHoops

Chick-Fil-A has the best product and the best service in comparison with its competitors (imo of course).   In the end, that’s why they are and will continue to be successful.  I never cease to be ama

LumRaiderFan
LumRaiderFan

Worshipping on Sunday won’t keep you out of Heaven...it’s not a Kingdom issue. Cut out the legalism, just get them in the door...you’re sounding like a Pharisee.

Kountzer

Kountzer

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Worshipping on Sunday won’t keep you out of Heaven...it’s not a Kingdom issue.

Cut out the legalism, just get them in the door...you’re sounding like a Pharisee.

If a person unknowingly worships on sunday it will not keep them out of heaven.  Obeying God is a kingdom issue.  If you know not to kill it is not legalism.  If you know and keep the true sabbath it is not legalism either. Legalism is obeying man's laws.  Sunday worship is a man made law.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kountzer

Kountzer

Posted
Posted
On 6/12/2018 at 7:03 AM, baddog said:

Let's see. Help me if I miss a few. In this country we can say the president is giving Putin BJ's, threaten to blow up the White House, show images of the president decapitated, say "F" Trump on national TV, allow illegal aliens to run loose, even with criminal records, disgrace the American flag and National Anthem, and all that sets right with the left. But say one thing bad about queer it refuse your services to them, then you have tread on their rights. What about everyone else's rights. We have them you know.

Even the left should see how stupid this is.

I've seen people on the right say and print things just as bad or worse. 

This country is headed for another civl war.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kountzer

Kountzer

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, REBgp said:

Have mercy, it seems like some denominations have one point they pick out of the whole Bible that makes them superior to all others.  Smh

I was harangued  about how I felt about chic fil a. You wanted to know what I thought.  There it is. 

 I feel they are put on a superiority pedestal because they close on the first day of the week.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LumRaiderFan

LumRaiderFan

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, Kountzer said:

If a person unknowingly worships on sunday it will not keep them out of heaven.  Obeying God is a kingdom issue.  If you know not to kill it is not legalism.  If you know and keep the true sabbath it is not legalism either. Legalism is obeying man's laws.  Sunday worship is a man made law.

The Jews worshipped every day...rested one.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kountzer

Kountzer

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

The Jews worshipped every day...rested one.

 

This is the hidden content, please
1"'This is what the Sovereign LORD says: The gate of the inner court facing east is to be shut on the six working days, but on the Sabbath day and on the day of the New Moon it is to be opened.

Per Ezk 46:1 and other places, the 7th day was the sabbath, the other 6 days were working days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Reagan

Reagan

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Kountzer said:

If you feel thet the bible is not the word of God you can always go the the koran.

Never said that.  You made a statement about some words, like Sunday, not being in the Bible.  And I said the "word" Bible wasn't in the Bible.  Making your point mute.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
BS Wildcats

BS Wildcats

Posted
Posted
2 hours ago, Kountzer said:

This is the hidden content, please
1"'This is what the Sovereign LORD says: The gate of the inner court facing east is to be shut on the six working days, but on the Sabbath day and on the day of the New Moon it is to be opened.

Per Ezk 46:1 and other places, the 7th day was the sabbath, the other 6 days were working days.

Who determines that Monday is not the first working day, making Sunday the Sabbath?  I've never read that the first day, when God created the heavens and the earth, was Sunday.  In your quoted scripture, I cannot find where Saturday is the Sabbath.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mat

mat

Posted
Posted

“Therefore do not let anyone judge you by what you eat or drink, or with regard to a religious festival, a New Moon celebration or a Sabbath day. These are a shadow of the things that were to come; the reality, however, is found in Christ” (

This is the hidden content, please
). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Kountzer

Kountzer

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, mat said:

The Jewish Sabbath was abolished at the cross where Christ “canceled the written code, with its regulations” (

This is the hidden content, please
).

There were two types of sabbaths. Now there is only one, the seventh day sabbath.  The ceremonial law and the ceremonial sabbaths were abolished at the cross.  The weekly 7th day sabbath, which is part of the 10 commandments was not.

If the 7th day sabbath was abolished at the cross then Jesus Christ would not have prophetically warned against fleeing on the sabbath during the destruction of Jerusalem in AD 70.   Also, the apostle Paul kept the sabbath well after the cross as stated in Acts 17:2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,953
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • baddog
      Kristi Noem Kills Dog

      By baddog · Posted

      This may have been her dog….lmao  
    • SmashMouth
      Baton Rouge split in half?

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      No doubt. It's definitely intriguing enough to watch how this all plays out...
    • tvc184
      Baton Rouge split in half?

      By tvc184 · Posted

      We all know that each state has its own laws which can be very different, especially in endeavors like annexation or incorporation, so there is no telling what Louisiana law says. I don’t know but I doubt that there is a point of appeal for Baton Rouge to force St. George to be absorbed back into Baton Rouge by now giving them what they asked for years ago. “Oh, we lost? Well let’s just undo incorporation, ruled as legal by the Supreme Court (of LA)  by going back and giving them what they asked for”. There has to be a law allowing such an appeal. I think what I read about the lower court decisions which actually backed up Baton Rouge, they did not all rule that incorporation was illegal but that they did not think the city could have services up and running soon enough. So you have a court saying that sure you can split but only if we agree that you can provide services get enough. In Louisiana, who knows? I doubt that Texas has such a mechanism to allow a city to split, for example, could the west end of Beaumont say that they wish to make their own city against Beaumont’s objection? I doubt it. Certainly Beaumont could allow a city to be created as Port Arthur did with Bridge City and Taylor’s Landing. There is a huge difference in allowing and forcing which is what happened in Baton Rouge. Similar to the sometime discussed topic of Texas splitting off from the United States because they don’t like the way things are going, think if citizens in any city in the United States were allowed to create their own city, which could not be stopped by the parent city.  That could get interesting!! Don't like what is happening in the south side of Chicago? Just de-annex and create your own city!! Anyway, I thought that it is an interesting story when the capital city splits in half.   
    • AggiesAreWe
      What has happened to Jasper?

      By AggiesAreWe · Posted

      Wasn't that 1st round loss last year? Also, during those previous 10 years I am pretty sure Jasper didn't go 2-58 in district play in the other 5 sports.
    • SmashMouth
      Even More From The Friendly muslims!

      By SmashMouth · Posted

      Ma'am, I don't think he said all Muslims were like that. If I'm reading this right, he's referencing the terrorist Muslims. You know, the ones who commit murder & have no regard for anyone who doesn't follow their jihadist beliefs...

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...