Jump to content

Coach Stark

oldschool2

By oldschool2
in High School Football

 Share

Recommended Posts

Bigdog

Bigdog

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

I guess the original thread was deleted.  There's another one but I'm sure it'll get deleted too.

Just in case...I figured I'd try one more time to let everyone know that I feel Coach Stark is way better off to not be at Hardin.  I think it was a no-win situation from the start...

You have made your point.  Why start another thread??

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Bigdog

Bigdog

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, oldschool2 said:

I enjoy defending coaches on here.  I had a whole thread worth of comments ready to be argued...and then it was deleted.

Why delete the original thread?

I didn't.  But apparently the matter is closed per an Admin or Mod.  Starting another one is going to have the same result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, bigdog said:

I didn't.  But apparently the matter is closed per an Admin or Mod.  Starting another one is going to have the same result.

 

I would like an explanation as to why.  Nothing was said out of line...or personal.  Just like this one.  In fact, there were a lot of comments praising Coach Stark as a coach and as a person.

So tell me why that deserves to be deleted.  Is this not a public forum where members can talk about games and events in regards to area school?  I would say that Hardin having a coaching change merits conversation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Uncle Pig

Uncle Pig

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

I would like an explanation as to why.  Nothing was said out of line...or personal.  Just like this one.  In fact, there were a lot of comments praising Coach Stark as a coach and as a person.

So tell me why that deserves to be deleted.  Is this not a public forum where members can talk about games and events in regards to area school?  I would say that Hardin having a coaching change merits conversation.

+1

Link to comment
Share on other sites
AggiesAreWe

AggiesAreWe

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

I would like an explanation as to why.  Nothing was said out of line...or personal.  Just like this one.  In fact, there were a lot of comments praising Coach Stark as a coach and as a person.

So tell me why that deserves to be deleted.  Is this not a public forum where members can talk about games and events in regards to area school?  I would say that Hardin having a coaching change merits conversation.

15) Please do not post unsubstantiated rumors, suspicions or slanderous comments about anyone - this includes non-members of the forums.

 

This is one of our rules here and in that thread there were some posts that violated that rule which is why it was deleted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

15) Please do not post unsubstantiated rumors, suspicions or slanderous comments about anyone - this includes non-members of the forums.

 

This is one of our rules here and in that thread there were some posts that violated that rule which is why it was deleted.

 

Wouldn't have been easier to just delete individual comments?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSgrad

WOSgrad

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, AggiesAreWe said:

15) Please do not post unsubstantiated rumors, suspicions or slanderous comments about anyone - this includes non-members of the forums.

 

This is one of our rules here and in that thread there were some posts that violated that rule which is why it was deleted.

Even more specific than that, allegations unfounded by any official findings were made about Coach Stark in the thread which I deleted.  Once that happens, the thread has been tainted and needs to be taken down.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

Even more specific than that, allegations unfounded by any official findings were made about Coach Stark in the thread which I deleted.  Once that happens, the thread has been tainted and needs to be taken down.

 

Just curious...

So every statement on this entire forum is one of which that was made by official findings?  

Because I personally see a lot of stuff on here that is presumed to be fact but not necessarily supported by any proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Scatright

Scatright

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

Just curious...

So every statement on this entire forum is one of which that was made by official findings?  

Because I personally see a lot of stuff on here that is presumed to be fact but not necessarily supported by any proof.

Let me save you guys the time. Here is how the conversation will go from here:

WOSGrad:  Oldschool, I am the boss and if you do not like it you can go to David Smoak's site and post there

Oldschool:  Can you point to one thing I have done that was in violation of the forum rules?

WOSGrad:  Do not challenge me or you will be eradicated.

Oldschool:  ...........

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSgrad

WOSgrad

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, oldschool2 said:

Just curious...

So every statement on this entire forum is one of which that was made by official findings?  

Because I personally see a lot of stuff on here that is presumed to be fact but not necessarily supported by any proof.

So, would you have preferred me to leave a baseless allegation of what Coach Stark did up for all to see?  That was a personal attack which is based on nothing other than the word of a poster who showed that he was not a fan of Coach Stark.  Neither Coach Stark, his family or anyone associated with the situation deserve to have to come upon this site to see that.  THAT is why the previous thread was deleted.

If you can't understand that, then I seriously have to look dubiously upon any future post which you claim to be on the side of coaches.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
oldschool2

oldschool2

Posted
  • Author
Posted
2 minutes ago, WOSgrad said:

So, would you have preferred me to leave a baseless allegation of what Coach Stark did up for all to see?  That was a personal attack which is based on nothing other than the word of a poster who showed that he was not a fan of Coach Stark.  Neither Coach Stark, his family or anyone associated with the situation deserve to have to come upon this site to see that.  THAT is why the previous thread was deleted.

If you can't understand that, then I seriously have to look dubiously upon any future post which you claim to be on the side of coaches.

 

Like I said... I think it would have been easier to delete an individual comment as opposed to the entire thread.  But hey...whatever.  I guess I didn't see the comment that you're saying was a baseless allegation about Coach Stark.  Honestly, I was hoping the truth would eventually come out about why he is no longer employed there.  So then...I could really start my defense as to how exactly he was supposed to win with obviously very little talent.  Relevant to their competition anyway.

And be my guest.  I implore you to try to find any post I have ever or will ever make that isn't on the side of coaches when referring to coaches specifically.  Go ahead...look as dubiously as you wish.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOSgrad

WOSgrad

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Scatright said:

Let me save you guys the time. Here is how the conversation will go from here:

WOSGrad:  Oldschool, I am the boss and if you do not like it you can go to David Smoak's site and post there

Oldschool:  Can you point to one thing I have done that was in violation of the forum rules?

WOSGrad:  Do not challenge me or you will be eradicated.

Oldschool:  ...........

Not at all, but I will quote this rule from the forum rules:

17) The admins and moderators here are volunteers. They dedicate a portion of their time to helping us with the forums. No abuse or disrespect of any of the admins or moderators will be tolerated.

Care to continue, sir?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,945
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    jacobmartin
    Newest Member
    jacobmartin
    Joined


  • Posts

    • baddog
      Kristi Noem Kills Dog

      By baddog · Posted

      Well, the ones who are upset by this are the same ones who can’t define a woman. There was another woman who everybody came down on for hunting. We are a nation of the offended.  
    • bullets13
      Kristi Noem Kills Dog

      By bullets13 · Posted

      For what it’s worth, polling after this came out show her with an 81% disapproval rating.  Only 21% of republicans said she’d be a good choice for veep, and only 28% of self-identified “very conservative” voters said she’s a good option.  Bragging about killing a dog apparently resonates poorly across political affiliations.  
    • bullets13
      Kristi Noem Kills Dog

      By bullets13 · Posted

      They don’t, and they won’t.  May not be an issue in South Dakota, but certainly is on the national stage.  Even my mother in law, who strictly watches OAN and thinks Trump is a great guy who’s never committed a crime in his life is completely disgusted by this.  I know about bad dogs, and don’t have an issue with what she did,  and I’m sure most of us on here agree.  But as is often this case, it’s not going to be our opinions that decide this election.  I thought she might be a valuable running mate that could bring in the female vote, but I’m hoping Trump has the sense to stay away from her now.  
    • LumRaiderFan
      Kristi Noem Kills Dog

      By LumRaiderFan · Posted

      I like the approach, here it is, if you don’t like it don’t vote for me, it’s refreshing to see the Ronald Reagan approach. Not every statement needs to be based on a perceived reaction from folks. Don’t think for a minute democrats didn’t have this knowledge, just not the right time to use it, remember Romney and the dog carrier, they knew.  
    • navydawg31
      Nederland is open, Barrow Resigns

      By navydawg31 · Posted

      The year after he left DC spell had them boys physical… beat Roschon Johnson and the Indians at home. They were roughing him up all night long. 

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...