Jump to content

TEXAS INDEPENDENCE- Again


Hagar

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Exactly right...I thing someone is stereotyping...once again! 

You are probably correct on that one.  Of course, it HAS to be a righty doing so because we all know that leftys hate stereotyping and being hypocritical and would NEVER be guilty of that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, LumRaiderFan said:

Exactly right...I thing someone is stereotyping...once again! 

Your presidential candidate would like to send them back to mexico and build a wall. which nothing that trump says or does is never condemned by the good conservative christians on this board

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, nappyroots said:

Your presidential candidate would like to send them back to mexico and build a wall. which nothing that trump says or does is never condemned by the good conservative christians on this board

Why shouldn't illegals be deported back to the country they came from?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, nappyroots said:

Your presidential candidate would like to send them back to mexico and build a wall. which nothing that trump says or does is never condemned by the good conservative christians on this board

He wants to send those back that are here ILLEGALLY, and says he will build a wall to make it more difficult for others to do it in the future.

He won't do either, but there is nothing racist about either idea.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hillary has already stated that she wants to hold gun manufacturers accountable in cases of gun violence. Now what could this mean? Does she mean that people can sue if a gun misfires? No! Her only intent is to drive gun manufacturers out of business.

And let's move on to background checks. A congressman has already proposed a law that would ban gun ownership for anyone going through a divorce. Feinstein has stated that she wants to ban guns from every military veteran. What's next? Ban guns from anyone who has honked their horn at another driver? Ban guns from anyone that dares question the policies of a sitting president? Ban guns from anyone that has been a internet tough guy?

The three biggest agendas for the liberals in the last 30 years has been entitlements, socialized healthcare and gun confiscation. They've about bankrupted the country with entitlements. They've made big strides in socialized healthcare. They're making big strides in some areas on gun ownership. They are not about to stop, no matter what they say.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
On May 12, 2016 at 6:51 PM, Englebert said:

Hillary has already stated that she wants to hold gun manufacturers accountable in cases of gun violence. Now what could this mean? Does she mean that people can sue if a gun misfires? No! Her only intent is to drive gun manufacturers out of business.

And let's move on to background checks. A congressman has already proposed a law that would ban gun ownership for anyone going through a divorce. Feinstein has stated that she wants to ban guns from every military veteran. What's next? Ban guns from anyone who has honked their horn at another driver? Ban guns from anyone that dares question the policies of a sitting president? Ban guns from anyone that has been a internet tough guy?

The three biggest agendas for the liberals in the last 30 years has been entitlements, socialized healthcare and gun confiscation. They've about bankrupted the country with entitlements. They've made big strides in socialized healthcare. They're making big strides in some areas on gun ownership. They are not about to stop, no matter what they say.

She's definitely coming after the 2nd amendment that is for sure…she's made that clear.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, whitechocolate said:

She's definitely coming after the 2nd amendment that is for sure…she's made that clear.

 

Chelsea, inadvertently I'm sure, stated that while campaigning for her mother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, nappyroots said:

Can't wait till Hispanics take over the majority in texas..........will make texas great again

Lmbo, no doubt nap.   They've done such a great job with their own country.   That was a funny post.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,971
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Sure.  You reassign an employee and they leave voluntarily instead of being fired and being open to litigation.  The outcome is the same, but you are making my point.  The superintendent and AD and principal are all empowered to make personnel decisions.  Instead of accepting the decision made, you talk about lawyering up, no one else was reprimanded, railroad job.  I am old enough to remember when high school sports taught life lessons...accountability being chief among them.
    • I know absolutely nothing about the situation, but I do know head coaches of sports other than the AD have actual teaching assignments, and I know from my wife having worked in the sped department of multiple schools that it’s not uncommon at all for coaches to shirk those duties.  It could very well be that this was the case at BC.  Or not, I don’t know.  Just bringing this up to point out the fact that, although many coaches only want to worry about coaching, they generally have several other responsibilities at the school.  some of them neglect or ignore these duties entirely.  If he’s been written up for other issues before, it’s a dumb argument to say “he was punished for this and others were not”.  If he had a pile of write ups in his file and they did not then it makes sense that the punishments were different.  
    • He wasn’t fired, he was reassigned and people get reassigned all the time. If he was actually fired, then you would have a point, but he wasn’t fired. Based on the information presented here no way this would stand if they fired him and he lawyered up. 
    • I heard the assistant was going to get this job and assume it was referring to the old Vidor coach, Nate Smith.  I always thought he did more with less at Vidor and can't help but think he shares some responsibility in Vidor's recent success. 
    • Classic Bridge City.  Always someone else's fault, refs/umpires cheated, AD with an agenda, yada, yada, yada.  As far as I can tell it's damn near impossible to get fired at these schools so when someone does get fired, it's usually something.  Drama at Bridge City is a constant.  The guy did a good job coaching basketball and I'm sure he'll continue that somewhere else.  Time to move on.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...