Jump to content

National Signing Day is today!


NDFan09

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Hullabaloo,Caneck!Caneck! said:

Oldtimer I assume he was referring that we finished 8th in recruiting in SEC so I was just pointing out that 5 of the 8 also finished ahead of them according to 247. It sounds good to say that and would be a major slam if we was in another conference but not so much when 5 outta of the top 10 teams hail from the SEC and 9 in top 25. 

Sorry my bad

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, bulldogbacker said:

From the experts

This is the hidden content, please

 

No one has time for your BR Slideshows

 

247- Texas #11, A&M #18

Rivals- Texas #13, A&M #16

Scout- Texas #8, A&M #21

 

Texas had the best day for their football program in 5 years and Finished with the better class

The sky was falling for A&M most of the day and they ended up with a class ranked 3-13 spots lower depending on ranking.     

I guess it's all on one's expectations, but it's seems the mighty have fallen a long way from the days when Mack had a Top 5 class every year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, PhatMack19 said:

No one has time for your BR Slideshows

 

247- Texas #11, A&M #18

Rivals- Texas #13, A&M #16

Scout- Texas #8, A&M #21

 

Texas had the best day for their football program in 5 years and Finished with the better class

The sky was falling for A&M most of the day and they ended up with a class ranked 3-13 spots lower depending on ranking.     

I guess it's all on one's expectations, but it's seems the mighty have fallen a long way from the days when Mack had a Top 5 class every year.  

I'm sorry you don't have time. Finding negative posts about every program in the country is very hard. 

Texas has taken back TEXAS. 

You have a reason to fear the 'sips. 

I know you like to look at the betting lines. 

I will bet you a 5 piece chicken dinner that Texas wins another national championship before Texas A&M. 

Let them eat crumbs. 

Hookem

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, TXHORN_ET said:

OK here goes. What I actually did on this topic was to cast the bait and see who bit. You can pretty much count on one fan base to take it hook, line, and sinker.  At times, it's just too easy. It's all in good fun. The season can't get here soon enough.

I guess you are talking about your SEC recruiting comment?   Yes we all know it's not good enough for A&M to finish 8th in the West and expect to compete.   They will have to do better going forward.  

 

A&M does add 3 likely starters for next year that transferred in.

-Former 5 star RB Keith Ford from OU was the best RB on the team last year according to most while he sat out his redshirt year.

-Former 4 star CB Priest Willis played 2 years at UCLA before coming to Aggieland.  

-Trevor Knight- He will have a chance to start from Day 1.  If he's good, watch out.

 

The offseason sucks.   I'm ready for September 3rd! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, bulldogbacker said:

I'm sorry you don't have time. Finding negative posts about every program in the country is very hard. 

Texas has taken back TEXAS. 

You have a reason to fear the 'sips. 

I know you like to look at the betting lines. 

I will bet you a 5 piece chicken dinner that Texas wins another national championship before Texas A&M. 

Let them eat crumbs. 

Hookem

While I agree they won on recruiting day they havent taken Texas over. They Still have to competed with TCU and Baylor on the field.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm pretty sure we'll see a much improved product on the field next season from the horns and aggies. Neither team is where they want to be. It's going to be interesting how both finish the 2016 season and what happens with their respective head coaches. Charlie bought himself a little more time with this recent recruiting class. At least one more season. Aggie won't be happy with a 4th place sec finish. Who gets axed first? Sumlin or Charlie? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, TXHORN_ET said:

I'm pretty sure we'll see a much improved product on the field next season from the horns and aggies. Neither team is where they want to be. It's going to be interesting how both finish the 2016 season and what happens with their respective head coaches. Charlie bought himself a little more time with this recent recruiting class. At least one more season. Aggie won't be happy with a 4th place sec finish. Who gets axed first? Sumlin or Charlie? 

I done bet a chicken dinner !!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Whoopi Goldberg's Lips said:

Not sure if sarcastic...

You don't know me very well then. I believe 9 of 14 SEC were on the top 25 list and 4 of 10 little 12 were on it. I mean, how can you even take yourself seriously if your conference name is the "Big 12" and there's only 10 teams. Rflmao

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, spoonbill said:

You don't know me very well then. I believe 9 of 14 SEC were on the top 25 list and 4 of 10 little 12 were on it. I mean, how can you even take yourself seriously if your conference name is the "Big 12" and there's only 10 teams. Rflmao

That's what I figured. How'd that 0-4 with Jones, Daniels, Shark, and Christmas-Giles feel yesterday bro? 

How does it make you feel any better that those other $EC schools beat us yesterday when you couldn't even beat Baylor? Quite frankly, celebrating their success is only going to lead to your misery in the future. I mean, you do realize you're going to get sodomized by those teams for the next several years, right?

I don't know... Guess I'm just a stupid sip that doesn't understand the almighty aggy logic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How many teams in the Big 10? Pac 10 bacame the Pac 12..... should be 12 Pac but that's just me. Lots of conferences gain and lose teams. Some change the name right away, some don't. There's humor in that? Some teams that left were a part of the Big XII when there were only 10 teams. Didn't laugh then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this discussion between Texas and A&M......To me they are pretty much in the same boat, they both have at least 4 strong teams in their conferences that I feel can play with anyone. Texas had a great day yesterday, but like the Aggies it takes a while to build the quality depth that is needed to compete in todays games. UT will be improved no doubt, Kyle Porter was a good one, and there defense should step up next year. The Aggie defense was definitely better this year, but again not enough depth all around. Alabama has that depth, as does LSU, Clemson, etc. Both teams should be improved, and as a Texan, I hope they both do well this season. Anyway, just my 2 cents.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, spoonbill said:

You don't know me very well then. I believe 9 of 14 SEC were on the top 25 list and 4 of 10 little 12 were on it. I mean, how can you even take yourself seriously if your conference name is the "Big 12" and there's only 10 teams. Rflmao

Where is the trophy?

rflmao

and Aggies left because of the LHN and of greener pastures. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,968
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    yielder
    Newest Member
    yielder
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Good news for this district is for the next two seasons your bi district opposition shouldn’t be much of a challenge… Royal may be better next year but other than that the district is pretty rough… Very good chance that it’s a clean sweep though
    • It’s terrible no matter what happened. I am always concerned with the news media and social media outright lies or incorrect information that is put out, maybe in a rush to be first. Watching the video, it is easy to see that some of the earlier claims are simply nonsense. The officer might be cleared or he might face trial but we should be disgusted with the misinformation. Having been on scene or shortly after an officer involved shooting three times, I can say that some information that comes out is a complete fabrication. This is a horrible situation no matter who was at fault. I wish that the nonsensical false information would stop. That won’t happen…..  
    • Trump walks to the beat of a different drummer so he could very likely pick a person that is on no one’s radar. Going by typical political logic, assuming that a VP pick might bring 0.5%-1% votes, who should it be? A half to one percent is not much but in a potentially razor thin election, a couple of thousand votes in a state could decide the presidency. Biden won AZ by just over 10,000 votes. The most recent Beaumont mayoral election, where almost no one votes, had over 15,000 votes cast. In GA it was 12,000 votes and Biden did not even get 50%. In WI it was 20,000 and again Biden didn’t get to 50%.  There are other states in that area of percent point difference. How important? If any two AZ, GA and WI flip, Trump would have won. So while the VP probably never matters…. can it this time? I think that it could. What then does the VP pick bring to the table? FL and SC were both won by Trump in 2020 so a favored son vote for Rubio or Scott won’t help Trump. Both are in a fairly comfortable position within the conservative community so they will neither hurt nor help with strong conservative voters.  What about the few fence riders that could and likely will determine the election by either sticking with Biden or switching from the last election? What about the people who did not vote in the last election, but may come out to vote in this one just to support the VP candidate? Could Scott sway a percentage point or two from Black support? Could Rubio help draw a percentage point or two of Hispanic support? Possibly on both counts. Like I already mentioned, they won’t help in their own states because Trump already won those in 2020. I personally think that either would actually do a good job as president (although VP picks are about the politics of being elected and not the “best” possible president) and might be the difference in a few votes but a few votes more is all that is needed.  Or…. My outlier, Tulsi Gabbard.  She had some decent support when are ran for the presidency in the Democrat primary. Could some people follow her because they support her and not necessarily the party? I’m sure that’s true for all candidates. Could she bring female support? As a strong mentally and physically person and a member of the military who was deployed into a combat zone into Iraq. Then she went to OCS and became an officer, then deployed to Kuwait. Can that military history, including deployment into a war swing some votes? As of late, she has been on a one person tirade against Biden and the Democrats. Let’s remember that Ronald Reagan was a Democrat and so was Texas governor John Connally. Connally was not only a Democrat governor in Texas but also Secretary of the Navy under JFK. Both ended up switching to the Republican Party so there is a fairly strong history of former Democrats switching parties and being successful, all the way up to the presidency. Gabbard is a pretty fiery campaigner and doesn’t mince her words. She would really be a thorn in the Democrats’ hopes and has the inside knowledge of the party. Could she potentially swing more votes than Scott or Rubio? I think so. But…. I don’t think that Trump would pick her and I’m not sure that she would accept if offered. Her odds of being Trump's pick are at about 1%.  Scott or Rubio at about 10%. Trump being Trump, will choose someone who no one has ever heard of. 
    • So biden's a creepy old pedophile after all...shocker! But that's where the smart votes are landing.
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...