Jump to content

Bin Laden

PhatMack19

By PhatMack19
in Political Forum

 Share

Recommended Posts

Mr. Buddy Garrity

Mr. Buddy Garrity

Posted
Posted

Pakistan was holding Bin Laden in that compound. He was unarmed and no records or information gathered.


http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/05/12/magazine/the-detail-in-seymour-hershs-bin-laden-story-that-rings-true.html?referrer=

One has to wonder if he's even dead now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
smitty

smitty

Posted
Posted

Well why did the SEALS have to sign legal documents after their raid, why get rid of the body so quickly?  Plausible story or not that is fishy.

Let's see, he gets shot in the face.  No photos are released.  They buried him 5 hours after the raid.  Pretty fishy to me.  Plus, obama needed to get rid of the "boogie" man that kept the war on terror going.  Think about it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites
baddog

baddog

Posted
Posted
If I remember correctly, Bin Laden's corpse was dumped at sea. I always thought that was a bit fishy. No pun intended. Bin Laden also had medical issues. He needed dialysis and I believe you do that at least a couple times a week and you don't just do that anywhere. He had to be in a semi civilized part of the world, not in some cave like I thought he got buried in.

Remember Sadaam Insane's two sons, Udu and Husay (sp.)? They were both killed in a firefight and their morgue shots were everywhere. I never saw one pic of Bin Laden dead. The skeptic in me thinks this was for some good reason.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
smitty

smitty

Posted
Posted

I'm not totally convinced they did.  They may have thought they did.  That's possible.  But I still say he died December 2001.  One has to remember, bin laden had kidney disease and was, i believe, on a machine back then.  Amazing how we forget the little things over time.  Now, again, too many fishy things went on.  Show the public the pictures.  But, again, would that solve anything.  Probably not:  He was shot in the face.  How convenient!  I'll say again -- obama needed to get of the the boogie man so he could suck up to the muslims.  But, on the other foot, I fault Bush for allowing the lie of bin laden being alive to continue so he could continue doing what he wanted to do. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
smitty

smitty

Posted
Posted

It has to be true, they already made a movie about it. ;) :D

 

I believe Seal Team 6 killed Bin Laden.

 

If not, that would be the world's greatest cover up. In these days and times with instant media, that could never happen.

World's greatest cover was:  The Kennedy assassination...      ;) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Chester86

Chester86

Posted
Posted

I'm sorry, what?

You know, I shouldn't have typed that and I apologize.  For someone who so passionately defends the Islamic religion I should accept that - and simply agree to disagree.  Carry on, and best of luck in your career.  I am happy that I am on the back side of my career, and not starting out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bullets13

bullets13

Posted
Posted

You know, I shouldn't have typed that and I apologize.  For someone who so passionately defends the Islamic religion I should accept that - and simply agree to disagree.  Carry on, and best of luck in your career.  I am happy that I am on the back side of my career, and not starting out.


I appreciate that, on both accounts. I have some liberal in me, but I don't want to ever give the impression that I support terrorism. I want them all dead, and I want us to be the country that kills them ;)
Link to comment
Share on other sites
jv_coach

jv_coach

Posted
Posted

SO you all really questioning if bin Laden was actually killed by the seal team 6.

We could ask Seal team 6 but they all died... What I am saying is their is a lot of shady events around all of this..

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/20/families-suspect-seal-team-6-crash-was-inside-job-/?page=all

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/12/24/341678/seal-team-6--the-ultimate-burn/
The mortal remains of all sailors and soldiers aboard the ill-fated helicopter, named "Extortion 17" were immediately cremated without permission from the families. Families were told this happened because the bodies were badly burned in the crash. But Charles Strange calls foul. In fact he says the story is a complete lie. Taliban on the ground in fact found the bodies of the crew. The Obama administration cremated everyone in order to cover up something, Western Center for Journalism writes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Ty Cobb

Ty Cobb

Posted
Posted

We could ask Seal team 6 but they all died... What I am saying is their is a lot of shady events around all of this..

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/20/families-suspect-seal-team-6-crash-was-inside-job-/?page=all

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/12/24/341678/seal-team-6--the-ultimate-burn/
The mortal remains of all sailors and soldiers aboard the ill-fated helicopter, named "Extortion 17" were immediately cremated without permission from the families. Families were told this happened because the bodies were badly burned in the crash. But Charles Strange calls foul. In fact he says the story is a complete lie. Taliban on the ground in fact found the bodies of the crew. The Obama administration cremated everyone in order to cover up something, Western Center for Journalism writes.

Wait a minute.  Are you saying the entire Seal Team 6, that killed bin laden, is dead?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Member Statistics

    45,978
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    cfbswami
    Newest Member
    cfbswami
    Joined


  • Posts

    • Separation Scientist
      West Virginia Sen. Joe Manchin leaves Democratic Party, registers as independent

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Exactly Lum. Right is still right regardless which way the wind blows. 
    • PhatMack19
      Road to Omaha

      By PhatMack19 · Posted

      High Point walks it off.  Vandy Whistler headed home!
    • Separation Scientist
      Bridgeland vs Tomball

      By Separation Scientist · Posted

      Tomball takes wild 2nd game 8-6. Both teams had 3 E's. Tomball gave up a late lead but first game pitching star Sampson nailed a 3 run homer to push Tomball to victory. 
    • UT alum
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By UT alum · Posted

    • CardinalBacker
      America lost. The Kangaroo Court won.

      By CardinalBacker · Posted

      My understanding is that the falsification of records was the crime that he was convicted of… but for it to have been a felony act, it had to have occurred in the furtherance of another criminal act. The prosecution had to first prove that the criminal act of falsifying documents had occurred. IF the jury believed that records were falsified, they were given three possible criminal acts… any one of the three would allow a felony conviction. The instructions stated that for any of the 34 charges, all twelve of the jurors had to agree that records were falsified, but they also had to believe that the records were falsified in the furtherance of at least one other, different crime. Six jurors could believe that Trump was falsifying records to avoid paying taxes… the other six could believe that it was skirt around election laws. The jurors didn’t have to agree on which of the three alleged criminal acts Trump was trying to further by falsifying records, just so long as they agreed that a) the falsification occurred and that it b) occurred to help him cover up another crime (for which he wasn’t charged and never proven to have committed or to have even occurred, for that matter).     Complete pile of crap as a prosecution, in my opinion.     But, we shouldn’t cry if our nominee is the kind of man who bangs porn stars while his wife is at home with the kid, then tries to buy her silence, then breaks the law in regards to falsifying documents to hide the evidence of the coverup.    If you’re wondering why falsifying those records might be illegal, it’s this. Money paid to your attorney for services performed can be deducted from one’s taxes as a legal expense. If the money is paid to a person to settle a personal claim, then the amount would be taxable-the falsification would have been done to avoid taxation. On the other hand, if campaign funds were spent to pay hush money and the records were falsified to hide the violation of campaign laws, then the felony occurred.    The bottom line is this…. They didn’t have enough evidence to indict trump on any of those three things that allegedly happened… but they DID have evidence that the financial records were falsified, so they point at these other acts which can’t be proven to bump the charges on falsification to a felony.    And the reason Trump didn’t take the stand is that he can’t go on the record about whether or not he had sex with Daniels… I’m certain that they can prove it and hang him up on perjury too.    The most delicious irony is this… Trump gave his supporters too much credit for their integrity. He thought they’d turn on him if they found out what he’d done, when in reality they wouldn’t have given a care… Trump’s whole falsifying records and quest for secrecy wasn’t even needed… his followers don’t have moral objections to his sinful acts.  

  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...