Jump to content

WOS Mustangs vs Gilmer Buckeyes


tennisbc

Recommended Posts

Tatum was not very good. Daingerfield went 1-9. Gladewater was very good, gave up a go-ahead TD to Gilmer with 0:09 left in the game.

Since when was Tatum not very good? Lol you're right about Dangerfield. They haven't been the same since 2012. But Tatum had the best team they've had in years. The adjustment of the classifications did them wrong. Lol Daylon Mack probably kept Gladewater in it. That man is a monster lol
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with everything you have said kilgoreaggie!!! Tatum and daingerfield were irrelevant this year really! The glade water game is their best win of the season and they could have very well lost! WOS will match up better than anyone else has! I believe our offense will put up points as well! Should be a good game!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with everything you have said kilgoreaggie!!! Tatum and daingerfield were irrelevant this year really! The glade water game is their best win of the season and they could have very well lost! WOS will match up better than anyone else has! I believe our offense will put up points as well! Should be a good game!


Look back at 2012, Gilmer cruised through the playoffs without breaking a sweat. Then they ran into a fast, mean Navasota defense that totally shut them down. 3 pts. I think WOS has that same type of defense.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speed vs more speed from gilmer.. WOS great season and great team beaten my Leps like dogs. But I'm going by what these teams have done so far this season.. give me gilmer by 24

 

Oh, you so want this to happen. How many times since last week have we seen your "good job WO-S for beating my Leps, but Gilmer will get ya" wishful posts? :rolleyes:   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

WOS needs to get turnovers and they can do that. Two ints and another Sm special teams TD and Stangs win. Key is they MUST create turnovers.

 

Yeah, we had two easy picks tonight, but both were dropped. I thought with a QB who throws so much we would surely get some INTs. Close, but no cigar this time. Next week, we'll need to force some. I agree.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm going for the mustangs obviously, but very nervous

I don't see any team in the state holding Gilmer's offense down for any duration of time, but then again WOS has the best defense in the state

I think Gilmer will score, and score often, but maybe Jack and the offense will come alive and go stride for stride
No more adrenaline than the SC game!
Praying im wrong, and maybe I can be motivation to prove me wrong
But I say Gilmer 42-28

Go Mustangs! Really hoping I'm wrong here, but an honest opinion
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Member Statistics

    45,972
    Total Members
    1,837
    Most Online
    TankParrish83
    Newest Member
    TankParrish83
    Joined



  • Posts

    • Funny how “MAGA” is considered a bad thing…. The MAGA crowd….etc…. Whoever doesn’t want to make America Great should leave. 
    • That's an interesting take, but considering that an incumbent enjoys a HUGE advantage historically, I think Covey came pretty close to an upset. I don't care one way or the other - the biggest reason being that I live in Hardin County. But I have to think the Trump endorsement got Covey that close in the first place. His only recognition was on a very local level, virtually unheard of before the Trump endorsement. Otherwise, he probably would've lost by thousands of votes instead of a few hundred. Just my observation.
    • I think the interesting point is this… Trump backed candidates do better when Trump is on the ballot. Back in March Covey was up by 3%, and that skirt from Jasper pulled about 10%… and most people believed that her voters would go directly to Covey. Conventional wisdom was that Covey would be up by 10-12 points if all things went according to the pattern from March. That just didn’t happen. Typically turnout is lower in runoffs than in the primaries, and my guess is that Phelan had fewer votes this time around than last, but covey had WAY fewer votes. A friend of mine has been watching a similar runoff in central texas, and the results were similar. The MAGA guy just didn’t turn out the votes this May.    My opinion is that a large portion of the support these Trump guys are just that…. Trump supporters. They’ll vote down ticket according to MAGA directives when Trump is on the ballot, but when they can’t vote Trump, they just don’t show up at all. 
    • This is the hidden content, please Sign In or Sign Up
    • Then you should have known lots of people said the exact same thing when the alcoholic Democrat Ann Richards was elected way way back in the day. Texas has become redder and redder ever since. People, especially blacks, are waking up and realizing the Marxist Democrats are destroying them. Feel free to hold your breath waiting on your dream to happen though. That would be fun to watch, LOL.  
  • Topics

×
×
  • Create New...