Englebert

Lol.  How many turnovers would a backup have had?  I promise you HF wouldn’t have scored.  There have been a grand total of two teams score more than 14 points on Carthage this year, and one of them played in the 5A state championship game last season, and has a reasonable chance to get there again this year.  You guys are killing me expecting HF to put up 35 or something and not turn the ball over against the best defense in the state.  HF could’ve easily lost 3 district games.  Y’all are acting like they’re WOS all of a sudden and should be competing in this one somehow.

You have proven over your many posts that you don't have the capability to perform that task. Maxine Watters would be a better source of information. Your TDS makes your comprehension skills a laughingstock to the board. Why would anyone heed your tainted "advice", especially when delivered in a vile and reprehensible manner.

You have proven over your many posts that you don't have the capability to perform that task. Maxine Watters would be a better source of information. Your TDS makes your comprehension skills a laughingstock to the board. Why would anyone heed your tainted "advice", especially when delivered in a vile and reprehensible manner.

And you only login to deride posters on this board. #SADDER

Like you don't stalk the members of the this board. Speaking of weirdos: who insults people then whines like a little girl when the insults are hurled back? Is that the definition of a weirdo?
Now get back on topic!

Like you don't stalk the members of the this board. Speaking of weirdos: who insults people then whines like a little girl when the insults are hurled back? Is that the definition of a weirdo?
Now get back on topic!

I really struggle with how delusional the left has become in general.  Don't get me wrong, there are some seriously delusional people on the right as well, but the ratio is skewed incredibly far to the left.  All of the evidence, and there is a LOT of it, (including clear video of all shootings) points towards self-defense.  Nearly all of the prosecution's witnesses are proving the case of self-defense.  The prosecution is not following the law and disobeying judge's orders in an attempt to illegally sway the jury (or to put the weight of dismissal on the judge to avoid losing when the jury returns).  And somehow, through all of this, the left has come not to the conclusion that Rittenhouse was defending himself, but that the judge is a biased, neo-nazi, unfair cheater?  Some of the news articles and social media comments I've been reading are mind blowing. 

Here’s the deal… some people say that the democrat party made a switch about 60 years ago and went from being the party of the white supremacists to becoming the party of minorities. Nobody can actually point to exactly when this change occurred. I disagree, and here’s why. 
I believe that there was no switch, but rather the Democrat party is simply the party of bigger government/higher taxes, and their bread and butter has always been racial politics. When it became obvious that it was no longer possible to motivate white people to vote D based on racial preferences, they had to decide who else would feel strongly enough about issues of race and that’s where you get the push for minorities from the 60s or so forward. 
But there’s no difference between a Democrat in a seersucker suit down south in the ‘30s hollering about race and a Democrat in a brightly colored suit yelling about race in 2021. 
I also think that’s why you’ve seen the small group of actual white supremacists move towards the republicans over the last few decades… they just don’t want to be a part of what is seen as the “minority” party, so they end up moving towards the Republican who don’t want them. 
You can look back forever and see that the republicans have always been for smaller government, pro-business, and on the moral side of every social issue from slavery to abortion. 

Just got confirmation that point margin is used for all seeding in a three way tie for 11-4A-II district.
So, if HF and OF win next week the seeding will be as follows:
1. WO-S
2. HF
3. Silsbee
4. Orangefield
 
If OF loses to HJ and HF wins, then its Silsbee #2, HF #3, OF #4. If HF loses and OF wins, then it's OF #2, Silsbee #3, HF #4. If both lose, #2 Silsbee, #3 HF, #4 OF.

You know what Maury, that baby does look like me!

Reported. Stop with the personal attacks.

Everything you post is dumbed down, no need to put in extra work.

Next time they should pick a store that does not sell firearms, and where most good ole boys shop….I recommend Dick’s😂

Ooh, nice retort. Did a third grader write that for you. Now get back to your whine fest. Entertain me some more.

This is not a reply to you Bullets, just a rant I want to expound upon my previous post. You got me riled up...in a good way.
I think I can make my point clearer. If Trump would have "abdicated his thrown" for whatever reason the first week into his presidency, Mike Pence would have assumed the role. Pence's moral/social standing is impeccable. If Pence would have enacted the same exact policies as Trump, I have absolutely no doubt, repeat, absolutely no doubt, that the same character assassinations would have commenced upon him. Lies, fake conspiracies, fake accusations would have been just as rampant. (See Brett Kavanaugh.) Pence's policy successes would have been ignored/buried per Liberal playbook. Through these unconscionable attacks, the Liberal media would have mobilized the anti-"GOP" vote no matter who was at the helm. History has shown this clear as day to me. It is even worse now. Watch how the media treats politicians differently based on party. Watch which scandals based on evidence get buried, and which scandals "go viral" based on zero credible evidence, you know...anonymous sources backed up by biased "experts". It has come to pass, it will come again.

These kooks worship the literal draft dodger, while trashing war vets like mattis and McCain, and have the nerve to call themselves patriots…
 
just straight up delusional 
 
 

I’ll attempt to put this in a nutshell…..
 Trump was seen as the man who would shake up the festivities of the Democratic Party aka. the deep state, and their millions in pocket money. You can’t be Mr. Nice Guy and get things accomplished. He rubbed people the wrong way and that is a good thing, whether you like it or not. 
 
This country was founded on the middle finger so I can’t see why true Americans get their panties wadded over some harsh words and criticism. Democrats are the sorriest  group of nut jobs I have ever seen. They deserved everything Trump said about any of them…. And a few Republicans too. 

TDS is really not good for your emotional well-being, but it does produce some hillarious posts. I'm starting to think that you are just "yanking our chains". It's not really conceivable that someone can actually be this unhinged. The hatred espoused must be a joke. Okay, you fooled me. You win. Can we now go back to semi-rational discussions.

This is not a reply to you Bullets, just a rant I want to expound upon my previous post. You got me riled up...in a good way.
I think I can make my point clearer. If Trump would have "abdicated his thrown" for whatever reason the first week into his presidency, Mike Pence would have assumed the role. Pence's moral/social standing is impeccable. If Pence would have enacted the same exact policies as Trump, I have absolutely no doubt, repeat, absolutely no doubt, that the same character assassinations would have commenced upon him. Lies, fake conspiracies, fake accusations would have been just as rampant. (See Brett Kavanaugh.) Pence's policy successes would have been ignored/buried per Liberal playbook. Through these unconscionable attacks, the Liberal media would have mobilized the anti-"GOP" vote no matter who was at the helm. History has shown this clear as day to me. It is even worse now. Watch how the media treats politicians differently based on party. Watch which scandals based on evidence get buried, and which scandals "go viral" based on zero credible evidence, you know...anonymous sources backed up by biased "experts". It has come to pass, it will come again.

Somehow my point is no getting across, Trump is a rude, crude blowhard, no argument from me.  You have never seen me defend his behavior.
I will also not defend folks that willingly vote for a destructive candidate over their hurt feelings.
I read regularly on this forum where parents are hammered for running a good coach out of town because he cussed or yelled at their kids, or worked them too hard.  If only the coach had been nicer, to heck with results, don't hurt feelings...how are those programs doing.
Only difference is this is much more important to our lives.

I never get bent out of shape, unless you go in the gutter...then I start playing. (You know I'm not referring to you.)
You are conflating the issue. I'm not apologizing at all for Trump's tweets/actions. In fact, I didn't like many of them, hated some. I liked that he did punch back when a punch was thrown at him. Probably because McCain, Romney, Bush never fought back against the punches (lies) thrown at them. What I'm doing is putting less weight on his tweets/personal actions and judging him more on his policy results. You are putting more weight on his tweets/personal actions than I do to evaluate the man. That's a slight but very common difference in philosophy. Everyone has their own set of weights. But I'm definitely not apologizing for him.
I will defend him for the media outrage that was perpetrated on him. Some of it was deserved because of his own actions, but most of it was just pure hatred by the Liberals. This has been their tactic (see Romney, McCain, Bush, Bush, and Reagan), but it was ramped up ten fold for Trump. I found that unacceptable and am disgusted by it. If the media would have bashed him for his bad behavior, but also treated him fairly for his policy successes, then he would have won in a landslide. He did not doom his candidacy, he was railroaded by the media. The media mobilized the Democrat voters through lies. Those lies against him, or anyone, is unacceptable to me.
And I definitely want to make that clear to as many as possible. The next GOP candidate will be accused of every immoral action known to man. The media/Liberals now know they can get away with this ratcheted strategy because it worked so well on Trump. We actually have people that voted for an incompetent fool because the media trashed a very, very successful incumbent. Social media tech was complicit and an active participant in the hijacking of the election, and will ramp it up even more in the next election. So no, no apologies, only a realistic view of poor actions from both sides, weighted appropriately.

Maybe the Dems should have given him the chance to show humility, instead of impeaching him knowing they were doing so with criteria that was proven false.  He had every right to go after the Dems and media as he did.  There’s not another man that would have stuck it out for four years like Trump did.  Personally, I feel biden is paving the way for his return.  He is single handedly setting the Dim party back years!

Don’t get bent out of shape, because I don’t disagree with much that you said here, but this is literally a trump apologist post.  I think trump did a pretty good job as president, and I voted for him twice.  The only difference between myself and a lot of folks on here is that I’m willing to place blame on him for the way he acted.  It’s directly affecting you, me, and everyone else as we speak.  He brought democratic voters out to the polls in a way that lame duck Biden never could, and pushed a lot of centrists left.  Y’all can continue to blame everyone that he upset for how stupid they were for voting for Biden, but that doesn’t change the fact that had he shown some humility and common sense, and not devoted so much time to insulting people, we wouldn’t be having this conversation (and our country would be a lot better off).

Who are the "Trump apologists"? Who are the ones defending his mean tweets?
As petulant as Joe Biden acts now, can you imagine how he would react if the media treated him like they do Trump? Talk about "bigly" petulance. 
Do you think the media will go after the GOP candidate (whoever it may be) with every derogatory, unsavory, unethical accusation known to man? And yet, somehow Trump will still get the blame.

If a person is still perpetuating the resoundingly debunked fire extinguisher narrative, maybe that person should shy away from commenting on any Jan. 6 topic.