Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/21/2025 in all areas
-
REMINDER
tvc184 and 2 others reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
Reminder and warning to not call people names or call them stupid. If you can't make your point without insults, then don't post. I assume most of us are adults3 points -
Treasonous Conspiracy!
thetragichippy and one other reacted to Reagan for a topic
Obama says he can’t be tried for treason because he wasn’t born in America! 🤣 [Hidden Content]2 points -
Treasonous Conspiracy!
Reagan and one other reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
Good Morning - Trump was not a lifelong politician. Based on your above quote you should of voted for Trump in 2016. He was accused of not being a Republican. He stood up against the Republican party, and he certainly stands his ground. He is not afraid to call someone out. The country may be divided, which is really debatable considering he is the first Republican since Regan to win the popular vote.2 points -
Since it’s how they refer to each other and their own organizations……1 point
-
Treasonous Conspiracy!
baddog reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
I think we have went over this. This didn't get noticed until 1/2 way through his first term. The Durham report showed some shady stuff, but nothing he thought could he criminal. Then there was 4 years of Biden admin. No one would seriously thought they would investigate Obama when they were busy trying to make Jan 6 worse than 911. Looks like the previous Democrat decided to investigate and founds some pretty damaging emails concerning what Obama knew.......1 point -
Treasonous Conspiracy!
tvc184 reacted to thetragichippy for a topic
Why would he do that? He loves the spotlight. He's been winning in the Supreme Court, in Congress, Democrats has a 19% approval rate (a 19 year low) - he organized a cease fire, he eliminated Iran as a Nuclear threat, The tariffs that everyone thought would tank the market has done the complete opposite and the market has set records.....all while in June Tariff income hit 113 billion for the year,,,,,the most ever.... No wonder the Democrats want to talk about Epstein.....lol1 point -
**COACHING CAROUSEL**
Goslin reacted to gary-us-bonds for a topic
What Finn did at Lee was top shelf stuff relative to what he had to work with. Not just anyone is going to be able to come in and keep things afloat like he did. I'm expecting the worst.1 point -
Treasonous Conspiracy!
thetragichippy reacted to OlDawg for a topic
Falsifying documents is a VERY serious charge. It seems this could be easily proven with the documents available. Much easier than a treason/sedition type charge which would tear the country apart. [Hidden Content]1 point -
Treasonous Conspiracy!
thetragichippy reacted to OlDawg for a topic
I hope history will remember Trump more for resetting world trade. That would mean his tariff gambit worked, the U.S. remained the economic juggernaut with the standard for currency, and the American people were better off from a security, employment, and personal financial position. I’m relearning Spanish to help me stay sharp—not Mandarin.1 point -
Breaking News - TRUMP to release EPSTEIN files and client list!
DCT reacted to CardinalBacker for a topic
“Reminder and warning to not call people names or call them stupid. If you can't make your pointwithout insults, then don't post. I assume most of us are adults.”1 point -
Treasonous Conspiracy!
thetragichippy reacted to OlDawg for a topic
Some of the debt was ‘supposedly added’ because of parliamentarian rules not allowing some of the offsetting cuts. I say ‘supposedly’ because CBO uses static numbers & doesn’t calculate in possible growth due to cuts in regulation, onshoring, and other investments. It’s been proven throughout American history that lower taxes ALWAYS returns more money to the government’s coffers.1 point -
As has been said by others, both sides spend too much. But, the Freedom Caucus—which aligns closest to a limited government/libertarian view—had to be promised more clawbacks to get their support for the OBBB. So, one side is fighting to maintain government control over almost every segment of our lives, and the other side is at least making an attempt to return to federalism. It’s not really a hard choice right now. Might not be ideal. But, a clear difference. Gridlock is typically good. But, it won’t help shrink the deficit—if that’s your concern. It would just maintain status quo. If OBBB hadn’t passed, our economy very likely would have gone into a recession because of the tax increases.1 point
-
Treasonous Conspiracy!
DCT reacted to Boyz N Da Hood for a topic
I personally like candidates from either side who stands up against their party and stand their ground... (very rare) Usually within no time they're on board after they get their backroom kickbacks..1 point -
2025 Texas Rangers
Mr. Buddy Garrity reacted to Ty Cobb for a topic
Took the detroit series. Pitching was awesome, gave up 3 runs in 3 games. The Las Vegas a’s come to town next.1 point -
"Article III, Section 3 of the U.S. Constitution defines treason against the United States as either levying war against them or giving aid and comfort to their enemies. It also states that a person can only be convicted of treason based on the testimony of two witnesses to the same overt act or a confession in open court, and Congress has the power to declare the punishment for treason." This levying war, not only war but the courts have used rebellion also, could be with bullets are actions taken by individuals against the US (rebellion) through subterfuge. I would think that what obama and his cronies did to sabotage a Presidency and have attempted coup against a sitting President could possibly defined an act of war. I did a little research. Examples: Based on available records, treason convictions in the U.S. have almost always occurred during or in connection with recognized wars or rebellions that courts treated as equivalent to "levying war." For example: Whiskey Rebellion (1794): Two individuals, John Mitchell and Philip Weigel, were convicted of treason for their roles in an armed uprising against federal tax collection in Pennsylvania. This was not a war with a foreign enemy but an internal rebellion, interpreted as "levying war" against the United States. Both were pardoned by President George Washington. Aaron Burr’s Conspiracy (1807): Burr was tried for treason for allegedly plotting to seize territory and form a separate nation. The Supreme Court, under Chief Justice John Marshall, acquitted Burr, ruling that conspiracy alone did not constitute "levying war" unless there was an actual assemblage of armed forces. This case, though not resulting in a conviction, occurred outside a formal war and clarified that treason requires overt acts, not just planning. Shays’ Rebellion (1786-1787): John Bly and Charles Rose were convicted of treason and hanged for participating in an armed uprising in Massachusetts against state authorities. This was prosecuted under state law, not federal, and occurred before the U.S. Constitution was ratified, but it was considered "levying war" against the state. Thomas Dorr (1844): Dorr was convicted of treason against Rhode Island for leading an armed attempt to overthrow the state government during the Dorr Rebellion, a non-war context involving a dispute over suffrage. He was sentenced to life in prison. John Brown (1859): Brown was convicted of treason against Virginia for his raid on Harpers Ferry, an attempt to incite a slave rebellion. This was prosecuted under state law and occurred in a non-war context, though it was treated as "levying war" against the state. While state-level convictions like those of Dorr and Brown occurred in non-war contexts (rebellions treated as "levying war" against the state), federal treason convictions have consistently been tied to wartime or rebellion scenarios. So, yes, either treason or sedition can be used concerning obama and others.1 point
-
Treasonous Conspiracy!
thetragichippy reacted to OlDawg for a topic
SCOTUS specifically ruled POTUS isn’t above the law. Read the actual ruling. SCOTUS specifically ruled POTUS can’t be ‘second guessed’ for official acts performed under his/her duties granted by the Constitution. The decision was sent back to lower courts for further development. Trump was re-elected. Case was closed before further development of what was official and what wasn’t. SCOTUS NEVER gave carte Blanche for any POTUS to perform illegal/criminal acts. But, they set the bar very high as to not infringe on Presidential powers. This ruling will also be what protects Obama from current accusations. Not so for others.1 point -
I have a hard time listening to people who want to play hardball, then cry when they get hit by a pitch. As I said, no more or less treasonous than Trump’s play for ballots and destabilization of election security. Lie in that batter’s box and cry for a while, baddog.1 point
-
Liberal reading comprehension????
5GallonBucket reacted to OlDawg for a topic
Not too bright without the teleprompter is he? LOL He managed to basically say hetero men have no feelings, and gay men are sissies all in the same response. Of course, since his father went absentee when he was 2, and he was raised by his mother & “the village”, what would one expect. It would have been hard for him to comprehend the duties of a husband and father from a first-hand experience. Would make me feel kinda sorry for him…if I had any empathy.1 point -
Treasonous Conspiracy!
thetragichippy reacted to OlDawg for a topic
The smartest thing this government could do would be to start revoking all security clearances at separations of service for either military or political personnel. Obama still has his clearance. Why? Same with any of them. Never did understand the policy of allowing them to continue. If someone needs to be read in, make them pass another clearance based on up-to-date information.1 point