All Activity
- Past hour
-
@Big girl @UT alum > (You Ok?!) @Boyz N Da Hood
-
I have a few question for ya'll to ponder and may have answers. As I understand it now, there is not an exit wound. There's video that a lady has seen from a camera that was directly behind Kirk. She's trying to get a copy of it to show everyone. She says it's not gory at all. NO blood on his back or neck. Next, where's the bullet? Did they find it? If there's not an exit wound, is it still in his neck? Thoughts?!
-
Way to go Coogs! Tough district schedule ahead, but all these sophomores are getting better and better
-
I take it you 2 have not been watching them play lately. I have and they have not played very good I give you two credit, at least y’all are hoping for the best
-
Who ya got?
-
I see 1. PNG 2. Huntsville 3. Montgomery 4. Dayton 5. Lake Creek 6. West Fork 7. Nederland 8. Splendora I believe the Westbrook vs Silsbee game showed how weak Nederland is this season They may struggle with Splendora this week
-
You’re right, Twitter was not government owned, but when it came to Trump and Covid, they may as well been, taking marching orders directly from the biden administration. That’s the sole reason they are under new management, thank goodness. Hypocritical idiots, now that’s super productive.
-
Silsbee (14) @ Beaumont West Brook (49) - FINAL
old guy 71 replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
The top two leading tacklers for Silsbee were held out due to injury, ( linebackers) not sure outcome would have been any different, but might have slowed down couple big runs -
Beaumont United (14) @ Jasper (0) - FINAL
Setx fan replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
21-19 in a tough district while playing teams like Chapel Hill and Carthage in preseason. Could be better but ain't all that bad. - Today
-
I’m not confident West Fork won’t finish higher than Nederland. Ned only has four TDs all season, and the competition will only get worse.
-
Beaumont United (14) @ Jasper (0) - FINAL
89Falcon replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
Don’t know how things have progressed but the current JR class had to cancel games in middle school due to “lack of numbers”. -
bullets13 reacted to a post in a topic: Jimmy Kimmel
-
bullets13 reacted to a post in a topic: Jimmy Kimmel
-
bullets13 reacted to a post in a topic: Jimmy Kimmel
-
bullets13 reacted to a post in a topic: Jimmy Kimmel
-
bullets13 reacted to a post in a topic: Jimmy Kimmel
-
AggiesAreWe reacted to a post in a topic: Jimmy Kimmel
-
Beaumont United (14) @ Jasper (0) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
Personally, I don't think the talent has dropped much at all overall. Do they have a Smith or an Armstrong? No. But got plenty of talent. -
Sherryflirm started following Andrew Landry
-
BMTSoulja1 reacted to a post in a topic: Beaumont United (14) @ Jasper (0) - FINAL
-
Stangfan#1 reacted to a post in a topic: Silsbee (14) @ Beaumont West Brook (49) - FINAL
-
Yeoj reacted to a post in a topic: Silsbee (14) @ Beaumont West Brook (49) - FINAL
-
Beaumont United (14) @ Jasper (0) - FINAL
Mr. Buddy Garrity replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
Has the talent dropped off that much since that year they went 4 rounds in the playoffs with him as HC? -
Beaumont United (14) @ Jasper (0) - FINAL
ace2335 replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
I’m sure I’ll be able to watch on YouTube PAISD. We know BISD not doing nothing unless it’s WB VS. BU which is sad. -
Correct as I originally stated in my first post ITT supporting ABC’s right to suspend, fire him, whatever. The post you quoted, or the exact portion you quoted, however, was the line dealing with a governmental official; specifically the FCC chair using his position to suppress speech. Which coincidentally was the whole point of the article that was linked where Ted Cruz was also criticizing him for the same reason I was. Every time I come to this board, usually takes about 24 hours for me to remember why it’s been weeks or sometimes months since my last visit 😂
-
I did not miss it, ABC is not Government owned. Whataboutism's is what folks use when they don't want to be called a hypocrite. You did say just as bad, so that was not aimed at you. I would disagree and say it is worse silencing someone running for President versus a talk show host trying to make people laugh or whatever it was he as trying to do. Lastly, had he just apologized as his Boss asked him to do, he would be back on television. We can ignore the past or learn from it.
-
Yep, just as bad. Although you miss the distinction that Twitter isn’t government owned. I just love being in the middle while the hypocritical idiots on the fringes of both sides continue to play whataboutism. Super productive.
-
TxHoops reacted to a post in a topic: Jimmy Kimmel
-
Yup - Republicans were up in arms when Trump was kicked off twitter during his campaign. Democrats not so much. This is just the opposite, although, Kimmel is not running for an elected office.
-
Silsbee (14) @ Beaumont West Brook (49) - FINAL
AggiesAreWe replied to jdawg03's topic in High School Football
BTW, I need to correct myself on the all time series between these two teams. I incorrectly posted that Silsbee led the series 2-1 going into this game. The correct record was 3-0 for Silsbee. So this was the first time ever for West Brook to beat Silsbee. -
I’m certainly not most people and I agree with this search. Obscenity would shut a lot of mouths. I don’t believe anyone should say “F” you to police. Freedom of speech in the U.S. is not absolute and does not cover incitement to imminent lawless action, defamation, obscenity, child pornography, fraud, true threats, or speech that causes a substantial and material disruption in specific contexts, like a school. The First Amendment applies only to government restrictions, not actions by private entities like employers or social media companies. Categories of Unprotected Speech The First Amendment does not protect the following types of speech: Incitement to imminent lawless action:Speech that is intended and likely to produce immediate illegal activity. Defamation:False statements of fact that harm someone's reputation. Obscenity:Material that appeals to the prurient interest, is patently offensive, and lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value. Child Pornography:Any material depicting actual minors engaged in sexually suggestive conduct or nudity. Fraud:False statements made with the intent to deceive. True Threats:Statements that express a serious intent to commit an act of unlawful violence against a particular individual or group. Fighting Words:Insults that are likely to provoke a violent physical response. Context-Specific Limitations Schools:Speech by students can be restricted if it causes a material and substantial disruption to the school environment. Protests:The police can break up a lawful protest if there is a clear and present danger to public safety, the protest interferes with traffic, or there's an immediate threat. Limitations on the Application of the First Amendment Government vs. Private Entities:The First Amendment only restricts government action; it does not apply to private companies or organizations. For example, a private company can fire an employee for their speech, or a social media platform can ban users for content that the government could not