All Activity

Appears they lost 4 🤷🏻‍♂️. They’re about to get another shot at Brookeland, though.

Why am I not surprised

All this winning! Ramp up the flights out!

Anyone see the Nederland scrimmage? If so, do you have any thoughts on what you saw?

9 years minus the 180ish days is a long time.

In Beaumont?

Of course.

Lmao!!!!!!

After only paying a few hundred dollars back to the district, but spending thousands while spending weekends in jail, Walker has finally had his probation revoked.

[Hidden Content]

Start working on Magatraz. Looks like we will be having some residents… [Hidden Content]

Obama ended the ‘dry foot’ policy as well while he was trying to play kissy face with communist Cuba. Truth be told, he probably ended the policy because Cubans are generally conservative voters. They don’t fit into the race-baiting Democrat playbook. That’s another very big reason why the authors of the 14th didn’t want birthplace citizenship. They spelled out ‘no foreigners.’ They wanted immigrants to assimilate before becoming a citizen. Today, everyone wants to be a ‘something-American.’ No one says they’re just an American any more. No assimilation. People live in their own little silos with like kind—usually based on race. I blame the racial politics of the Democratic Party. They’ve been splitting people apart by race since they began as a Party. It’s only gotten worse over time.

You’re right. The way that the process typically works is that the CAD looks at nuts and bolts. Square footage multiplied by a value per foot and sets your appraised value. They’ll usually make correction if you protest with an actual error, like “that storage building has been gone for two years” or something along those lines… if you have a question of value (like a deteriorated driveway or a partially finished interior), they usually stick by their calculations. You’ll then need to ask for a hearing by the Appraisal Review Board-they’re independent citizens that mediate disputes between the CAD appraisers and the taxpayers. They’ve got more leeway to adjust value than the appraisers that are working exclusively off of ratios and numbers. The only time that I’ve had success arguing value with the CAD was one year when I’d paid for an independent appraisal for a home equity loan in that exact year, and the detailed report from the independent appraiser swayed the county appraiser to adjust the value downward before I went to see the ARB-and I think it happened because they knew I’d prevail at the ARB hearing with my evidence. But we still negotiated a little bit.

Yep. But what they fail to address is that without a decent driveway, no way in hell am I getting the appraised value for my house and property.

WAAAY off topic, but your comment reminds me of a joke: "You know the problem with female referees in the NFL? They keep bringing up stuff you did like 3 games ago..." 🤣

You’re not wrong. The CAD is trying to make sure that your appraised value is within 95-105% of its actual market value this year. Sometimes they’re on point and sometimes they’re way off. BUT, if my house has a sale price of $100k, I don’t leave the table with $100k. By the time you back out closing costs, a survey, title policy, buyer concessions and realtor fees, I’d be doing good to leave the take with $87k. I’m annually paying property tax on the fees that were paid once to others. That’s not fair IMO… but I don’t know how to make it any more fair. I don’t disagree with your driveway scenario, but like they said-the value of paving isn’t considered as a part of your CAD appraisal. Two mostly identical houses…Should somebody with a long driveway pay more than somebody with a short one? Same goes with fences… i don’t have one, but neighbor has a bunch of money tied up in a four rail fence and remote controlled entry gate. They just don’t consider those things. There’s good ground and bad ground. Some pastures stay wet half of the year, but others drain immediately-the acreage is taxed the same while we all agree that the actual values would vary greatly. It’s an inexact science that should be explained better, but it’s hard to reason when the typical response is made in anger.

It’s very clear why Reagan did it, I’ve actually explained the reasoning. Why don’t you read answers when you ask questions?

I dont have a problem with illegals being deported. Read what I wrote earlier

Candace Owens mopping the floor again. I really like her…

I asked her but, well, you know……..fence post syndrome.

Do you know what "perseverating" means? That's what you're doing. We're talking about something happening right now, and your only response is to (repeatedly) bring up something from 40 years ago. The irony is you keep asking this question but won't address why it was okay for Obama to deport so many people.

I know I will catch some flack for my beliefs, but I don’t care. I’ve seen it questioned before and I had already thought about it. I worry about AI developing into something that completely takes over….ie…….Terminator or I Robot. To me that’s not weird at all. When you create something that can think for itself, getting smarter in the process, and we have all experienced ‘glitches’ with our electronics, it’s a very conceivable concept. I’m sure there are very useful applications for AI, but at what point do we lose control over technology? I’d like to hear other’s thought on the subject. This is an interesting theory on AI. They are already trying to phase out cash to be replaced with chip loaded cards. Our phones track our every move, calls, searches, browsing history, etc….This hasn’t crossed my mind, but I find it interesting.

Ok. Why do you think Reagan felt it was necessary? What do you think motivated him to do it?

At least she would get the necessary treatment. I know some great foster parents in Harris County. I yake care of a lot of kids in foster care.