All Activity

Still no proof of fraud. Still no proof the system is rigged or corrupt. None. Zero, zip, nada. Like I say, the Republican Party loves to fix problems that don’t exist.

I’ll ask you like I did Reagan. Where is the evidence of election fraud? Where is the proof that any race anywhere anytime has been statistically altered because of fraud of ANY kind? Our election system is the safest in the world. Why take efforts to restrict voting when historically it has been made easier and more accessible to the citizenry? Because Trump is a natural born cheat.

Don't y'all ever did back flips all over the field after beating either of them though.🤣🤣

He interviewed with KFDM last week too. Very interesting

This team is very good, but the 22-23 team probably could have beaten anybody in the state besides Hitchcock & those pesky Bucs 😆... I Watched a lot of games that year. They could shoot/had size/ & controlled tempo almost every night.

22-23 team had just dropped down from a tough 4A district so I think they were more equipped to play the slow down game with athletic teams. Offensively they were pretty polished and a bit more difficult to guard in the half court with the stuff they ran. This group I think is a bit more lose on offense which made it easier to guard them when Hitchcock played them 23-24 year.

I think this group is the better basketball team overall and is deeper. I do think that group was a little more athletic. Gave Hitchcock all they wanted in the third round that year

Agreed, only team that could be an issue is Mexia possibly. Like someone else said earlier just mostly have to stay out of their own way. In D2 both teams you mention are on a collision course. Looking forward catching a few playoff games for sure.

They could win the region. I think the tougher bracket will be in D2 I’m assuming if Onalaska and Westwood go that route.

I work at a bank, possibly protecting YOUR money if you use a bank. To open an account we require two forms of ID, which 1st form is typically a DL or State ID. How would you like of the bank gave away your money because someone stole your wallet, grabbed your Social security card, came to the bank pretending to be you and the bank gave him 10 grand out of your account? I bet you and every other Dem would support photo ID when it comes to taking money from your account. Nothing is fraud proof, including photo id, but it helps.....just like the wall helps but people, with time, can figure out a way around it. The newest fraud is stealing bank statements and ordering a fake DL with your info and their picture....then walking into a bank you bank out in a different town, they claim to be traveling and get a couple thousand to stay under radar.....They can do that at a few different banks before they are caught. It is difficult to claim someone is not who they claim to be,,,,,,because if you are wrong, it's a bad look..... This will pass the senate

Pam Bondie yesterday at the hearing. She’s pretty spot on.

I am not even referring to Hillary but I wouldn’t put it pass them. IMO

Not taking anything away from this years team but I think the team Pete Regusa's senior(22-23) year was a little bit better. The window is open this year for OF to win the region though.

The you would have to believe Hillary really murdered all those folks? I've never bought into the hype of that.

They should've been D2 but a D1 team didn't make the post season which moved them up.

Maybe a newsflash to some, but the Constitution doesn’t guarantee the right to vote for President. In fact, if a State decided they didn’t want to vote for the Office of the President position, SCOTUS would have to turn itself into pretzels to make them. The Constitution and other Amendments and rulings only guarantee that if one person in the state is allowed, all must be equally allowed within rules set by the State. As a libertarian, I’m not against photo ID for voting. I think it’s pretty common sense. But, if required, the burden should be on the State to provide a uniform, acceptable form of ID. The burden shouldn’t be on the individual. Texas offers a free EIC card for voting. They even have mobile units for folks that might have transportation issues. I don’t know about all the other States. Of course, as I mentioned to @baddog, if the voting machines/tabulators/officials have integrity issues, photo ID’s are kind of a moot point.

Don’t know when this will happen. If you go to YouTube and search the blueprint episode 10 and go to the last 22 minutes or maybe last 24 min he talks about it and was very passionate and serious

Nonsense, it's not voter suppression. Only white liberals believe that the poor and downtrodden don't have the ability to get an ID.

Still no proof illegals affect outcomes. Dems voted against PHOTO ID, not voter ID. Voter ID has always been part of a remarkably accurate and transparent election process. Find the evidence otherwise. You can’t because there is none. Ergo, all efforts to “clean” the system are disguised attempts at vote suppression. They don’t care how, just reduce turnout.

This was Pam Bondi yesterday…literally.

Why can’t the DOJ disclose it and let these powerful people come after the DOJ? Is that not the number one thing that our government is suppose to do? ….Protect Us.

1. You’d have to ask them that. 2. Yes, you don’t think powerful people take out other people that would make them look bad and black ball their business dealings going forward?

Of course this is discussion - The question still remains - why don't they go public. If he 25 year DOJ is correct in his assumption in my original post, they will not disclose for fear of being sued. Money above morals?